Rave Radio: Offline (0/0)
Email: Password:
News (Media Awareness Project) - Medical Marijuana Advocates Criticize High Court's Ruling
Title:Medical Marijuana Advocates Criticize High Court's Ruling
Published On:2000-08-31
Source:Los Angeles Times (CA)
Fetched On:2008-09-03 10:28:07
MEDICAL MARIJUANA ADVOCATES CRITICIZE HIGH COURT'S RULING

http://www.latimes.com/editions/orange/20000831/t000081711.html

Santa Ana activist says justices are inflicting 'cruel and unusual
punishment' on ill people who use pot to control pain or nausea.

With the United States Supreme Court on Tuesday coming one step closer
to barring Californians from giving marijuana to people racked by pain,
the quality of mercy has become ever more strained, local advocates
said.

"What the Supreme Court is doing is inflicting cruel and unusual
punishment on people who are already in pain," said Marvin Chavez, a
Santa Ana marijuana-for-medicine activist who spent 15 months
imprisoned on drug charges related to his cannabis club.

Chavez, 45, called the court's decision "a drug war against sick and
dying Americans."

Orange County criminal attorney Robert L. Kennedy, a supporter of
marijuana for medical use since his son-in-law died of brain cancer
three years ago, said he was "thunderstruck" by the Supreme Court
decision.

He called it odd that the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors on
Tuesday took steps that would allow a needle exchange program on the
same day the justices showed a strong willingness to strike down the
distribution of marijuana for medical purposes.

"People are dying, suffering, and they can't have medicinal marijuana.
But we're going to give clean syringes to heroin addicts," Kennedy
said. "It's so ironic, it's absurd."

The Supreme Court order shocked and frightened Californians who have
found that marijuana--legal for medical use here since 1996--is the
only thing that lessens their suffering from such debilitating
illnesses as cancer, AIDS, multiple sclerosis and epilepsy.

The court ruling, which backs a U.S. Justice Department move to close
an Oakland cannabis club, is seen as indicating justices' willingness
to consider invalidating the state's medical marijuana law.

The justices sided with the Clinton administration, which had asked it
to overturn a lower court ruling allowing the Oakland club to resume
distribution of marijuana.

The Oakland club and five others were part of a Justice Department case
to test the California law.

Tuesday's ruling is unlikely to have much immediate effect on the
approximately two dozen cannabis clubs that sprang up around the state
to distribute marijuana to patients who met the state's requirements
for its use.

However, the court's decision was widely interpreted as a signal it
will consider the legality of the proposition this fall and could ban
all the clubs, which have become the major conduit for patients to
receive their marijuana.

Club operators said the ruling is unsettling to the approximately 5,000
Californians permitted to use marijuana.

"Our phones have been ringing off the hook. People are afraid," said
Scott Imler, president of the 840-member Los Angeles Cannabis Center in
West Hollywood, one of the largest and most stringently run clubs in
the state.

Imler, who helped write the 1996 initiative and smokes marijuana to
alleviate pain from epilepsy, called Tuesday's ruling "a bad omen." But
it will not stop the club from providing marijuana to its members, 80%
of whom have AIDS or are HIV positive.

"We have come too far in the last few years, and we have no intention
of being driven back to the streets to meet our needs," Imler said.

Kennedy said the ruling would force people to grow their own marijuana
or buy it illegally.

Three years ago, as his son-in-law Paul Comouche lay dying, Kennedy
read that marijuana helped reduce the pain of cancer. He contacted
Chavez, then director of the Patient, Doctor, Nurse Support Group in
Garden Grove. Chavez provided Comouche with marijuana until Comouche
died at age 31.

Kennedy became Chavez's lawyer when he was arrested in 1998 on charges
that he sold marijuana to an undercover officer posing as a caretaker
for a terminally ill patient.

"Personally, I wouldn't have wanted my son-in-law, who was a choirboy
till he was 21 years old, having to buy from a drug dealer in the
streets," Kennedy said.

Some in law enforcement welcomed the ruling and said the Compassionate
Use Act, approved by voters as Proposition 215, has created problems,
including some healthy marijuana users hiding behind the law.

In Ventura County, the chief of the sheriff's narcotics unit cheered
the court's action, saying he hoped justices would strike down the law.


"We don't feel there's sufficient medicinal benefits of the drug, and
they've created a nightmare for us to deal with," said that chief,
Capt. Dennis Carpenter.

"Many people we've known for years to be users now all of a sudden have
severe headaches, and before the law came up they had no medical
conditions."

Operators of cannabis clubs hotly dispute that, saying their members
must meet stringent requirements to receive their product.

Many say it is the only thing that relieves pain and nausea and enables
them to keep down food and medicines.

Marlene Rasnick, 56, a cancer patient in Los Angeles, insists the
marijuana she obtains from the Los Angeles Cannabis Center and smokes
daily is what gives her the strength to keep fighting her illness.

Marijuana "has been my best defender, both from the disease and the
therapy," the actress and teacher said. Without marijuana to deal with
the effects of the disease and the chemotherapy, "I don't know what I'd
do," she said.

Times staff writer Margaret Talev in Ventura County contributed to
this report.
Member Comments
No member comments available...