Rave Radio: Offline (0/0)
Email: Password:
News (Media Awareness Project) - US CO: Judge Rules Police Must Return 39 Marijuana Plants to Couple
Title:US CO: Judge Rules Police Must Return 39 Marijuana Plants to Couple
Published On:2007-11-27
Source:Rocky Mountain News (Denver, CO)
Fetched On:2008-01-11 17:54:20
JUDGE RULES POLICE MUST RETURN 39 MARIJUANA PLANTS TO COUPLE

A Fort Collins couple and their lawyer plan to visit the Larimer
County sheriff's office Wednesday in hopes of recovering 39 marijuana
plants seized by narcotics officers during a raid at their home in August 2006.

A Larimer County District Court Judge ruled Monday that authorities
must return the plants and growing equipment taken from James and
Lisa Masters. Their lawyer described them as medical marijuana
providers for themselves and about 8 to 10 other people.

Brian Vincente, lawyer for the couple, hopes authorities have taken
care of the plants as provided by the state's medical marijuana law,
which was approved by voters in 2000.

"If they've allowed these plants to die, they've broken the law,"
said Vincente, executive director of Sensible Colorado, a non-profit
advocacy group of medical marijuana patients.

He described the ruling as the largest return of medical marijuana to
a grower since the law went into effect.

If the plants were destroyed, Vincente said his clients will seek
compensation for the plants, which he estimated to be about $100,000.

Representatives of the Sheriff Department and the Larimer County Drug
Task Force could not be reached for comment Tuesday.

However, Larimer County District Attorney Larry Abrahamson said his
office is weighing whether to appeal the decision issued verbally in
court by Judge James Hiatt.

"We're getting a transcript of the ruling itself," Abrahamson said.
"Then we'll sit down and evaluate it."

If prosecutors appeal, he said they would likely seek an order
staying the judge's order to return the plants and equipment to the Masters.

According to Vincente, the plants first came to authorities'
attention after police accompanied a social service worker on a visit
to the couple's home.

Masters allowed the officer into his home on the assumption that he
was protected by the medical marijuana statute, his lawyer said.

Later, police raided the home using the earlier visit as the basis
for a search warrant.

In June 2006, Hiatt tossed out the charges against the Masters after
ruling that the search warrant was illegal.

Vincente argued that the officer who drafted the warrant, "wrote up a
search warrant on what he had already searched."

Monday's hearing concerned the issue of whether the marijuana and
equipment seized was contraband or property that needed to be
returned to the Masters.

Hiatt heard about four hours of testimony from police as well as
people who said they rely upon the couple not only for medical
marijuana, but for rides to hospitals and doctors and other care.

While no one had designated the Masters as caretakers at the time of
the raid, Vincente argued that the couple's actions met the
definition of the term as spelled out in the law.
Member Comments
No member comments available...