News (Media Awareness Project) - US CO: State Reviewing High-Court Ruling On Medicinal Pot |
Title: | US CO: State Reviewing High-Court Ruling On Medicinal Pot |
Published On: | 2001-05-16 |
Source: | Denver Post (CO) |
Fetched On: | 2008-09-01 08:46:47 |
STATE REVIEWING HIGH-COURT RULING ON MEDICINAL POT
Wednesday, May 16, 2001 - Colorado's attorney general is reviewing the U.S.
Supreme Court's medical-marijuana ruling to see whether it conflicts with a
state law set to take effect June 1.
Preparations to implement the law were put on hold Tuesday, and patients
who had hoped they soon could buy and use marijuana openly are ready to
retreat underground.
"A lot of patients had been organizing and hoping to move forward" with
buyers' clubs or organized distribution of the drug, said Martin Chilcutt,
who backed the first effort to put the issue before voters in 1998.
"Now it has to remain underground. It's foolish for any of us to stick our
necks out" after the court's ruling, he said.
T. Scott Pegues, executive director of the Colorado AIDS Project, said that
before the ruling, AIDS patients also intended to form buyers' clubs. Now
those plans are history.
The nation's high court, ruling in a California case, found that federal
law does not allow a "medical necessity" exception to prohibitions against
distributing marijuana.
The court did not strike down California's medical-marijuana law, but the
ruling paves the way for authorities to close an Oakland cannabis buyers'
cooperative.
Colorado voters in November overwhelmingly approved a constitutional
amendment that would allow possession of a small amount of marijuana.
Under the law, a patient with a "debilitating medical condition" can, with
a doctor's recommendation, be listed on a state registry and be issued a
state identification card allowing the patient to possess a small amount of
marijuana.
The law did not establish a distribution system, so buying and selling
marijuana is still illegal.
Many patients claim smoking marijuana eases complications from AIDS,
symptoms of multiple sclerosis and nausea caused by some cancer treatments.
The high court's decision hasn't caused every Coloradan who wants to use
marijuana to retreat underground.
Despite the court's ruling Monday - which was the first day on the job for
the Colorado health department official who will oversee the medical
marijuana program - the department fielded five calls Tuesday from people
requesting applications to participate in the program.
Altogether, the state has received about 50 inquiries about the program
since the November election, said Carol Garrett, state registrar of vital
records.
Nevertheless, plans to implement the program are temporarily on hold,
pending the attorney general's review of the ruling, a health department
spokeswoman said.
Attorney General Ken Salazar hopes to have the analysis completed soon,
said spokesman Ken Lane.
Lane declined to say whether the implementation of Colorado's new law will
be postponed.
Staff writer Allison Sherry contributed to this report.
Wednesday, May 16, 2001 - Colorado's attorney general is reviewing the U.S.
Supreme Court's medical-marijuana ruling to see whether it conflicts with a
state law set to take effect June 1.
Preparations to implement the law were put on hold Tuesday, and patients
who had hoped they soon could buy and use marijuana openly are ready to
retreat underground.
"A lot of patients had been organizing and hoping to move forward" with
buyers' clubs or organized distribution of the drug, said Martin Chilcutt,
who backed the first effort to put the issue before voters in 1998.
"Now it has to remain underground. It's foolish for any of us to stick our
necks out" after the court's ruling, he said.
T. Scott Pegues, executive director of the Colorado AIDS Project, said that
before the ruling, AIDS patients also intended to form buyers' clubs. Now
those plans are history.
The nation's high court, ruling in a California case, found that federal
law does not allow a "medical necessity" exception to prohibitions against
distributing marijuana.
The court did not strike down California's medical-marijuana law, but the
ruling paves the way for authorities to close an Oakland cannabis buyers'
cooperative.
Colorado voters in November overwhelmingly approved a constitutional
amendment that would allow possession of a small amount of marijuana.
Under the law, a patient with a "debilitating medical condition" can, with
a doctor's recommendation, be listed on a state registry and be issued a
state identification card allowing the patient to possess a small amount of
marijuana.
The law did not establish a distribution system, so buying and selling
marijuana is still illegal.
Many patients claim smoking marijuana eases complications from AIDS,
symptoms of multiple sclerosis and nausea caused by some cancer treatments.
The high court's decision hasn't caused every Coloradan who wants to use
marijuana to retreat underground.
Despite the court's ruling Monday - which was the first day on the job for
the Colorado health department official who will oversee the medical
marijuana program - the department fielded five calls Tuesday from people
requesting applications to participate in the program.
Altogether, the state has received about 50 inquiries about the program
since the November election, said Carol Garrett, state registrar of vital
records.
Nevertheless, plans to implement the program are temporarily on hold,
pending the attorney general's review of the ruling, a health department
spokeswoman said.
Attorney General Ken Salazar hopes to have the analysis completed soon,
said spokesman Ken Lane.
Lane declined to say whether the implementation of Colorado's new law will
be postponed.
Staff writer Allison Sherry contributed to this report.
Member Comments |
No member comments available...