Rave Radio: Offline (0/0)
Email: Password:
News (Media Awareness Project) - US CA: Attempt To Oust Marin's D.A. Fails Miserably
Title:US CA: Attempt To Oust Marin's D.A. Fails Miserably
Published On:2001-05-23
Source:San Francisco Chronicle (CA)
Fetched On:2008-09-01 07:51:30
ATTEMPT TO OUST MARIN'S D.A. FAILS MISERABLY

Resounding Rejection Of Marijuana Activists

Marin County District Attorney Paula Kamena resoundingly defeated yesterday
a recall attempt backed by a coalition of medical marijuana activists and
disenchanted family court litigants.

Voters clearly were not swayed by arguments that Kamena was victimizing
users of medicinal marijuana, voting by more than 4 to 1 to retain Marin's
first female district attorney. In unofficial final results, the effort to
oust Kamena failed 40,777 votes to 6,735 votes, or 86 percent to 14 percent.

"This is a very important day for Marin County," Kamena said last night
during a victory celebration at Falkirk Cultural Center in San Rafael. "The
voters told the world that they would not accept deceptive and misleading
tactics or political pressure from people who want to make the D.A. bend to
their will."

The failed attempt to oust Kamena means replacement candidate Tom Van Zandt,

a patent attorney who has never handled a criminal case, will not get the
experience of being Marin County's top prosecutor.

The election was a kind of test case in a statewide effort to force county
prosecutors to honor Proposition 215, the 1996 state initiative allowing
the cultivation and use of marijuana for medicinal purposes. (The U.S.
Supreme Court ruled last week that federal anti-marijuana laws make no
exception for medicinal use.)

Kamena was the first of six district attorneys in the state threatened with
recall by medical marijuana activists to actually face a vote of the people.

The 55-year-old career prosecutor, who in 1999 was elected as Marin
County's first female district attorney, was forced to fight for her job
not only against the cannabis lobby but also against a fringe group of
unhappy family court litigants.

Medical marijuana activists said yesterday's failed attempt would not deter
their advocacy.

"It's been very important that we took a stand for civil rights and medical
rights," said Lynette Shaw, head of the Marin Alliance for Medical
Marijuana. "This is just a start. We need to initiate a policy statewide
that stops police from harassing patients, pulling plants and confiscating
medicine."

Marin's recall movement actually started out as an attempt to oust several
judges who at one time or another handled a case involving Carol Mardeusz.

Mardeusz lost custody of her daughter in 1995 after a bitter court battle
with the girl's father. She has been peppering the courts with legal
challenges ever since, repeatedly accusing the father of child molestation.

She was declared a vexatious litigant in Sonoma County, and prosecutors in
Sonoma and Marin concluded that her very public allegations against the
father were at best unprovable.

A jury in Marin County found her guilty last year of falsifying a court
order and perjuring herself in an attempt to steal custody of her daughter.

A group of divorced parents upset with the outcome of their child custody
cases rallied to her defense, but they could not collect enough signatures
to recall the judges.

Instead, they enlisted the help of the Marin Alliance for Medical Marijuana,

which gathered enough signatures for the Kamena recall even though there is
no mention of medical marijuana on the petition.

Van Zandt, the only candidate to replace Kamena, is Mardeusz's brother. He
accused the district attorney of refusing to investigate the family court
judges or their alleged co-conspirators in a scheme to railroad his sister
and others.

Kamena argued that she had nothing to do with family law and nobody ever
accused the judges of any legitimate crimes.

But it was pot, not family law, that was believed to be the biggest threat
to Kamena's job.

The recent U.S. Supreme Court decision affirming the federal prohibition
against pot clearly hurt the case against Kamena. Even so, most observers
considered Kamena's policy on the prosecution of medical marijuana cases to
be relatively progressive.

She is one of 15 district attorneys who have set guidelines for marijuana
prosecutions, exempting people with fewer than seven mature plants, 12
immature plants and a half-pound of dried weed.

Nonetheless, pot proponents said that her guidelines did not prevent the
arrest of patients and suppliers or the confiscation of their medicinal plants.

Kamena, who raised about $80,000 to fight the recall, said she is proud of
her record since taking office.
Member Comments
No member comments available...