News (Media Awareness Project) - US CT: Bias, High Costs Blunted Success Of '90s Drug War |
Title: | US CT: Bias, High Costs Blunted Success Of '90s Drug War |
Published On: | 2001-06-29 |
Source: | Dallas Morning News (TX) |
Fetched On: | 2008-09-01 03:37:41 |
BIAS, HIGH COSTS BLUNTED SUCCESS OF '90S DRUG WAR
Some States Reassess Penalties, Goals
NEW HAVEN, Conn. - When an epidemic of crack and gang violence erupted in
cities such as New Haven in the 1990s, police and lawmakers struck back hard.
The war on drugs yielded dozens of new laws, including mandatory sentences
for drug dealers and heavier penalties for dealing crack rather than
powdered cocaine.
But those laws also had unintended consequences in minority communities.
Black men make up less than 3 percent of Connecticut's population but
account for 47 percent of inmates in prisons, jails and halfway houses,
2000 census figures show.
Overall in Connecticut, one in 11 black men ages 18-64 is behind bars, the
census found. In 1990, that figure was about one in 25.
Similar disparities can be seen across the country. In Louisiana, one of
the few states to receive updated race statistics from the census, black
inmates outnumber whites 3-to-1; black people account for a third of the
state's population.
Nationwide, the Justice Department reported that 12 percent of all black
men ages 20-34 were locked up last year.
"I don't think anyone intended it to be this way, but if you were trying to
design a system to incarcerate as many African-American and Latino men as
possible, I don't think you could have designed a better system," said
state Rep. Michael Lawlor, co-chairman of the Connecticut Legislature's
Judiciary Committee.
The National Conference of State Legislatures estimates that state
governments spend $20 billion a year fighting drugs.
Some states are trying to ease the drug laws of the 1990s, putting more
money toward prevention and treatment.
"You can't put every drug user in jail, because if you do, and they don't
get any help, they're going to be right back in again," said Chief State's
Attorney Jack Bailey, Connecticut's top prosecutor for 10 years.
This year, the Legislature voted to give judges more leeway in sentencing
drug dealers who operated near schools, child-care centers and public
housing projects.
The old law set a three-year mandatory minimum sentence for dealing within
1,500 feet of those places. In densely populated New Haven, that meant
virtually everywhere except the Yale University golf course and the
Tweed-New Haven airport runway.
While drugs also are prevalent in Connecticut's mostly white suburbs, the
preference there for powdered cocaine over crack and the area's sprawling
development meant that few suburban dealers faced the same penalties.
In California this year, a ballot proposition takes effect that will mean
treatment instead of prison for many first- and second-time drug offenders.
Offenders' records are cleared if they complete treatment.
A similar 4-year-old program in Arizona has saved money because treatment
is cheaper than imprisonment, an analysis found.
Similar programs are being considered in Ohio, Florida and Michigan.
Some politicians, however, believe a hard line on drugs is appropriate, or
do not wish to be seen as soft on crime.
"I think it sends out a very negative message to the public at large," said
Connecticut state Rep. Ronald San Angelo, a Republican who opposed changing
mandatory minimum sentences.
People who lived through the gang and drug wars also offer caution. While
they are angry that a generation of young black men are in prison, they do
not want to return to the past.
Lorraine Stanley, a resident of a New Haven housing project for 13 years,
recalled how a drug gang called the Jungle Brothers terrorized her
neighborhood. Police eventually broke up the gang, and now a police
substation in the neighborhood keeps crime down.
"Things have gotten a whole lot better," Ms. Stanley said.
Despite changes in the laws, other experts said racial bias in the courts
and poverty in the cities will continue to lead to more prison time for
minorities.
Frank Mandanici, a public defender in New Haven, said that bias among
juries affects black defendants.
"Racism permeates our society. It's a cancer no one is willing to address,"
he said. "There is no test on how to detect it and what to do with it."
Yale political science professor Donald Green said the density and poverty
of cities combined with law enforcement tactics have put more black people
in prison.
"Drug use is similar in white and nonwhite populations, but the level of
enforcement is very different among the two groups," he said.
Some States Reassess Penalties, Goals
NEW HAVEN, Conn. - When an epidemic of crack and gang violence erupted in
cities such as New Haven in the 1990s, police and lawmakers struck back hard.
The war on drugs yielded dozens of new laws, including mandatory sentences
for drug dealers and heavier penalties for dealing crack rather than
powdered cocaine.
But those laws also had unintended consequences in minority communities.
Black men make up less than 3 percent of Connecticut's population but
account for 47 percent of inmates in prisons, jails and halfway houses,
2000 census figures show.
Overall in Connecticut, one in 11 black men ages 18-64 is behind bars, the
census found. In 1990, that figure was about one in 25.
Similar disparities can be seen across the country. In Louisiana, one of
the few states to receive updated race statistics from the census, black
inmates outnumber whites 3-to-1; black people account for a third of the
state's population.
Nationwide, the Justice Department reported that 12 percent of all black
men ages 20-34 were locked up last year.
"I don't think anyone intended it to be this way, but if you were trying to
design a system to incarcerate as many African-American and Latino men as
possible, I don't think you could have designed a better system," said
state Rep. Michael Lawlor, co-chairman of the Connecticut Legislature's
Judiciary Committee.
The National Conference of State Legislatures estimates that state
governments spend $20 billion a year fighting drugs.
Some states are trying to ease the drug laws of the 1990s, putting more
money toward prevention and treatment.
"You can't put every drug user in jail, because if you do, and they don't
get any help, they're going to be right back in again," said Chief State's
Attorney Jack Bailey, Connecticut's top prosecutor for 10 years.
This year, the Legislature voted to give judges more leeway in sentencing
drug dealers who operated near schools, child-care centers and public
housing projects.
The old law set a three-year mandatory minimum sentence for dealing within
1,500 feet of those places. In densely populated New Haven, that meant
virtually everywhere except the Yale University golf course and the
Tweed-New Haven airport runway.
While drugs also are prevalent in Connecticut's mostly white suburbs, the
preference there for powdered cocaine over crack and the area's sprawling
development meant that few suburban dealers faced the same penalties.
In California this year, a ballot proposition takes effect that will mean
treatment instead of prison for many first- and second-time drug offenders.
Offenders' records are cleared if they complete treatment.
A similar 4-year-old program in Arizona has saved money because treatment
is cheaper than imprisonment, an analysis found.
Similar programs are being considered in Ohio, Florida and Michigan.
Some politicians, however, believe a hard line on drugs is appropriate, or
do not wish to be seen as soft on crime.
"I think it sends out a very negative message to the public at large," said
Connecticut state Rep. Ronald San Angelo, a Republican who opposed changing
mandatory minimum sentences.
People who lived through the gang and drug wars also offer caution. While
they are angry that a generation of young black men are in prison, they do
not want to return to the past.
Lorraine Stanley, a resident of a New Haven housing project for 13 years,
recalled how a drug gang called the Jungle Brothers terrorized her
neighborhood. Police eventually broke up the gang, and now a police
substation in the neighborhood keeps crime down.
"Things have gotten a whole lot better," Ms. Stanley said.
Despite changes in the laws, other experts said racial bias in the courts
and poverty in the cities will continue to lead to more prison time for
minorities.
Frank Mandanici, a public defender in New Haven, said that bias among
juries affects black defendants.
"Racism permeates our society. It's a cancer no one is willing to address,"
he said. "There is no test on how to detect it and what to do with it."
Yale political science professor Donald Green said the density and poverty
of cities combined with law enforcement tactics have put more black people
in prison.
"Drug use is similar in white and nonwhite populations, but the level of
enforcement is very different among the two groups," he said.
Member Comments |
No member comments available...