NCAA TESTING FOR NEW TARGET

Supplements Such As Ephedrine Have Become Biggest Problem For Colleges,
Which Use Random Procedures.

There's not much notice given--and that's the point. College athletic
directors are told 24 to 48 hours in advance that the NCAA will be on
campus administering drug screenings. Teams must assemble with a formal
roster in hand, used to randomly pick the men and women to be tested.

The procedure has been in place since 1990, started at a time when the NCAA
and member schools primarily were trying to ferret out use of illegal
street drugs--marijuana, cocaine--or steroids. Combating those drugs
remains a concern, but today the war has shifted to another front:
nutritional supplements that contain banned substances such as ephedrine, a
stimulant with potentially dangerous side effects.

"Our biggest problem is supplements," said Dr. Gary Green of UCLA, chairman
of the NCAA drug testing and drug education subcommittee. "If I could make
a wish today, I would make them all go away because they make our job
extremely hard."

The NCAA conducts between 10,000 and 12,000 drug tests a year on athletes,
Green said, making it the largest testing program of its kind in the United
States.

Supplements containing ephedrine allegedly were used by two college
football players who died recently--Rashidi Wheeler of Northwestern and
Davaughn Darling of Florida State.

Northwestern declined to comment on its in-house procedures for
drug-testing athletes. School spokesman Chuck Loebbaka says the university
will "not be talking in detail about anything" during the investigation
into the death of Wheeler, 22, of Ontario. Wheeler, who suffered from
asthma, died Aug. 3 after collapsing while running a rigorous conditioning
drill at Northwestern.

But his death has raised questions about the effectiveness of drug testing
conducted by the NCAA and individual schools.

Green said "about two-thirds" of positive drug tests conducted by the NCAA
in the last few years are a direct result of supplement use. A positive
test carries an automatic one-year suspension, subject to appeal. After a
year, an athlete can apply to have his or her eligibility reinstated.

Of 4,599 athletes tested by the NCAA from July to December in 1999, 46 (1%)
tested positive for a banned substance, according to the latest published
figures provided by the National Center for Drug Free Sport in Kansas City,
Mo., an independent company contracted to collect urine samples for the NCAA.

Of those who tested positive, 35 (76.1%) were detected to have consumed a
substance that could have come from a nutritional supplement, said Frank
Uryasz, president of the NCDFS.

Supplements containing ephedrine have been a particular problem since the
drug was added to the NCAA's list of banned substances in 1997.

"A lot of [athletes] are not [competing] this year because of ephedrine
use," Green said. "We've probably had a dozen ephedrine positives in the
last year."

Green said supplement use increased among college athletes after Mark
McGwire revealed in 1998--the year he hit a major league-record 70 home
runs--that he boosted his power by taking creatine, a legal supplement, and
androstenedione, a "steroid precursor" on the NCAA's list of banned substances.

NCAA Division I schools addressed this issue last summer by prohibiting the
distribution of many supplements.

Officials said they wanted to send a message that because supplements are
not regulated and have not been subjected to comprehensive laboratory
testing, they should not be distributed to student-athletes.

The NCAA has issued warnings about the use of nutritional supplements that
may contain banned substances such as ephedrine and nandrolone.
Student-athletes are advised to check with a team physician or athletic
trainer before taking any supplement.

Random testing in any sport can occur at an NCAA championship"playoff or
football bowl game. Tournament directors and drug-testing site coordinators
are notified of the testing plan no earlier than seven days before testing,
which is usually conducted after the event.

The year-round, on-campus testing program is limited to Division I and II
football and Division I men's and women's track and field. Athletic
directors are notified no earlier than two days before testing.

In those sports, where drug use is suspected to be more prevalent, testing
occurs at every school at least once a year, sometimes more. Athletes in
any sport who have tested positive for a banned substance also are subject
to year-round testing.

After urine samples are collected, they are sent to the UCLA Olympic
Analytical Laboratory in Westwood, where they are screened for these banned
drug classes: stimulants, anabolic agents, diuretics, street drugs, peptide
hormones and urine manipulators.

The NCAA does not require individual schools to have drug-testing programs,
but Green said nearly all Division I schools have some form of
institutional testing. About half of the Division II schools test their
athletes, Green said, and there is no institutional drug testing at the
Division III level.

"Each [school] has its own needs and problems," Green said. "The only thing
we require is, if a school does have [drug testing], it has to follow its
own policy. If you violate your policy, then that is an NCAA violation, if
it gets reported."

But that's a big if, considering schools do not have to report positive
tests to the NCAA. Green said schools can test for whatever substances they
choose.

"We don't police them," he said.

Mary Wilfert, NCAA program coordinator for health and safety, said the NCAA
will provide guidance for schools establishing a drug-testing program.

At USC, athletes are subject to random testing even if their sport is not
in season. University officials declined to say when or how often they
test, except to say it is random. That means they cannot test during
preseason physicals.

"You can't include it," said Daryl Gross, USC associate athletic director.
"There are legal ramifications of getting outside of random testing."

The university's random drug tests rely on urine screening to check for
anything on the NCAA's banned substance list.

"To do it, you've got to spend some money," Gross said.

USC can afford the costly testing in part because the school of pharmacy
collects and handles the samples. Samples are sent to the UCLA Olympic
Analytical Laboratory.

Uryasz of the NCDFS said it costs between $200 and $250 per athlete to test
urine samples. That includes collection, administrative costs and
laboratory costs.

USC responds to positive results on a case-by-case basis.

"We talk with the coach and the team physician and the drug-testing
coordinator to come up with an appropriate response," Gross said.
"Counseling is a must. It's an educational approach, but you still have the
threat of being suspended."

In general, first-time offenders are given counseling. With the second
offense, the athlete is often sent to counseling and suspended. With the
third offense, "It's almost three strikes and you're out," Gross said.

In-house results are not reported to the NCAA.

Drug testing at UCLA can be triggered three ways.

A computer program randomly selects 10% of the approximately 650
student-athletes for testing once a month from August to May. The medical
staff can request that an athlete be tested if drug use is suspected, and
an athlete who has tested positive is subject to testing at any time.

A fourth positive test in an athlete's career will result in permanent
dismissal from the team and the athlete's financial aid will not be
renewed. Associate Athletic Director Betsy Stephenson said no UCLA athlete
has tested positive four times.

Previously, an athlete was dismissed after three positive tests in a single
year.

"We made it more of a deterrent," she said.

An athlete must undergo counseling after the first and second positive
tests and the head coach is notified. A third positive test results in
immediate suspension from the athlete's next game and three more counseling
sessions.

Stephenson, citing confidentiality issues, would not disclose how many
Bruin athletes have tested positive or whether there are greater problems
in certain sports.

An athlete who voluntarily discloses a drug problem to a team physician is
not considered to have tested positive and coaches are not notified.

"Our team physicians were probably teaching faculty and feel strongly about
the program being education-based," Stephenson said.

Reports of local college athletes testing positive for drugs have been scarce.

Jelani McCoy quit UCLA's basketball team only weeks before the NCAA
tournament in 1998 because, according to sources, he had failed
school-imposed drug tests multiple times and was on the verge of removal
from the team.

In 1994, Frankie Hejduk of UCLA's soccer team drew a one-year suspension
after he tested positive for marijuana during a random NCAA drug test,
sources said.

In 1986, USC's football team lost a starter before a bowl game for the
second consecutive year when offensive guard Jeff Bregel failed an NCAA
drug test. He admitted he had used a steroid while undergoing
rehabilitation after knee surgery. The previous year, Trojan receiver Hank
Norman failed a drug test before a bowl game.

Some athletes have found ways to get around testing.

A rumor has circulated for years that a football player in the Pac-10
Conference, faced with a follow-up test after a positive screening for
marijuana, smuggled his girlfriend's urine into the test. Only one problem:
she was pregnant.

In 1990, USC quarterback Todd Marinovich was the subject of drug rumors and
was tested often by the school. However, he avoided sanctions by admittedly
sneaking in someone else's urine when he was tested.

Marinovich, 32, is currently in a drug treatment program under Proposition
36 for his conviction on felony heroin possession.