Rave Radio: Offline (0/0)
Email: Password:
News (Media Awareness Project) - US NC: No Sober Counsel For Some Defendants
Title:US NC: No Sober Counsel For Some Defendants
Published On:2001-12-27
Source:News & Observer (NC)
Fetched On:2008-08-31 09:11:10
NO SOBER COUNSEL FOR SOME DEFENDANTS

DURHAM - In this festive season of office parties and partying, we are
often reminded of the carnage caused by drunken drivers. Can we add to
the list of victims the clients of alcoholic and cocaine-addled
lawyers -- those on Death Row waiting to be executed, and those
already dead?

We're not sure that North Carolina leads the nation in drunk or
impaired lawyers representing persons facing the death penalty, but
sadly, the state is doing its unfair share.

In a case close to home, Governor Easley will decide if a man too poor
to hire his own lawyers should die Jan. 11 after getting the unlucky
draw of a state-appointed, impaired lawyer. Charlie Mason Alston,
formerly of Warren County, now on Death Row, had a drug-using lawyer
who is now disbarred. Ten days before being involuntarily committed to
Dorothea Dix Hospital, the attorney missed a filing deadline which
prevented the case from being reconsidered or appealed in the federal
courts.

Alston has always maintained his innocence. There were no eyewitnesses
to the brutal slaying of Pamela Renee Perry. She was beaten with a
hammer in the face before she was suffocated with a pillow.
Fingerprints found on evidence at the scene matched someone else.

There's no direct physical evidence linking Alston to the murder: no
blood evidence, no fiber evidence. Nothing, despite the incredibly
bloody crime scene. Making matters worse, the local police lost DNA
evidence which could have proved Alston's innocence.

The prosecution's case was based on circumstantial evidence. The
victim was Alston's girlfriend, whom he had assaulted six weeks before
her murder. One hundred dollars worth of quarters were stolen from a
jar in her bedroom the night of the murder. Alston was said to have
purchased items that night with quarters, but the jar didn't have his
prints on it -- it had someone else's. Not long after the murder,
Alston and a women friend, one of the state's witnesses, were driving
and ran out of gas. A Highway Patrol officer gave him a ride. Alston's
clothes had no blood on them. He didn't have the $100 in coins either.
Too bad he ended up with an impaired post-conviction lawyer when he
needed a zealous advocate.

Unfortunately, Alston is not alone. In one western county, an
alcoholic trial lawyer had three clients sentenced to death in less
than two years. One of those men, Ronnie Frye, was executed this year.
Those death sentences were the first handed down in that county in
decades. The same lawyer, who had a blood alcohol concentration of .32
on a DWI conviction -- enough alcohol to kill some people -- still
represents a client facing the ultimate penalty.

So we propose that the General Assembly pass a Lawyering While
Impaired (LWI) law. Make it a crime for an attorney to work on a death
penalty case, at trial or post-conviction, with any alcohol, cocaine,
heroin or other intoxicating substance in his body, and provide a
procedure for clients to challenge their convictions on this basis
alone.

It's illegal for a commercial trucker to drive "while consuming
alcohol or while alcohol remains in the person's body." A criminal
defense lawyer in a capital case requires no less skill than a truck
driver, or a brain surgeon. The consequences of error are no less dire.

The adage "you'll never meet a rich man on Death Row" probably can't
be banished from our lexicon until the death penalty is abolished. One
way to begin fixing our broken system is to make sure that poor people
aren't represented by attorneys who are too stoned to keep their
clients off Death Row.

We hope citizens will contact the governor and ask him to spare the
life of Charlie Mason Alston. Innocence knows no season. To execute
anyone, at any time of year, even in small part because of the
personal failings and legal omissions of his lawyer would bring a
terrible retribution upon us, not the least the judgment of history
and doubts about our commitment to an equal and fair justice. This is
all the more critical when the condemned may be innocent.

D. Tucker Charns is president of the Durham Criminal Defense Lawyers
Association. Alexander Charns is a member of the 14th Judicial
District Grievance Committee. The opinions stated are their own.

Comments regarding clemency cases can be sent by email to
clemency@ncmail.net; or to the postal address, Governor's Office,
20300 Mail Services Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-0300.
Member Comments
No member comments available...