Rave Radio: Offline (0/0)
Email: Password:
News (Media Awareness Project) - UK: Why They Call It 'Dope'
Title:UK: Why They Call It 'Dope'
Published On:2002-01-06
Source:San Francisco Chronicle (CA)
Fetched On:2008-08-31 08:25:26
Addictions

WHY THEY CALL IT 'DOPE'

Pot Really Can Blow Your Mind

Oxford, England -- Across Europe and America, the legalization of cannabis
for personal use generates intense debate.

Britain has, to all intents and purposes, practically decriminalized
marijuana usage.

As a neuroscientist, I am concerned. One common justification for
legalization or decriminalization of cannabis centers around the idea that
it does not involve a victim. At least four reports in major medical
journals -- Ramstrom (1998), Moskowitz (1985), Chesher (1995) and Ashton
(2001) -- show the contrary.

Costs to the community include accidents at work or at home, educational
under-attainment, impaired work performance and health-budget costs.

Another argument is over that cannabis is nonaddictive. Of course, defining
addiction is hard. But if one regards it as an inability to give up, then
there is strong evidence that cannabis incites dependence. Recent
scientific papers report many users in the United States, United Kingdom
and New Zealand now seek treatment for dependence. Other papers show that
10 percent of users want to stop or cut down but have difficulty doing so.
A paper in 1998 reported that 10 to 15 percent of users become dependent on
pot.

It was shown recently that withdrawal symptoms were experienced after only
three days of light use. Heavy users confront a worse situation. Dr. Bryan
Wells, a rehabilitation expert, says that for the first time he's beginning
to see in heavy cannabis users the withdrawal symptoms produced by hard drugs.

Another argument is the beneficial effect of marijuana on pain. So far,
that evidence is anecdotal; it is hard to exclude placebo effects. The
results from clinical trials are awaited.

But distinctions should be drawn between recreational drugs and medicines,
as they are for opiates. If cannabis is a painkiller, then it must have a
huge impact on the physical brain.

Indeed, widespread reports exist of the impact of cannabis on the brain, in
particular areas concerned with memory (hippocampus), emotion (mesolimbic
system) and movement (basal ganglia). Cannabis affects a variety of
chemical systems and it works via its own receptor -- its own molecular target.

The fact that there is a naturally occurring analog of cannabis in the
body, as there is for morphine, provides a basic reason to differentiate it
from alcohol.

For an agent that affects a variety of transmitter systems, it is as though
it were a transmitter itself. This is not surprising, for cannabis has a
clear effect on psychology. Not only does it produce euphoria, but the
effects, often overlooked, may also include anxiety, panic and paranoia.
Disorders in psychological performance, attention impairments and memory
deficits are well known.

More disturbing -- and less frequently acknowledged -- is the fact that
these effects can be long-term.

In one recent study, the attention spans of ex-users were compared to those
of current users, short-term and long-term. The abstainers, who had been
users for at least nine years, had quit from three months to six years
before the study. Of the current users, one group had at least 10 years of
dependence; the other, about three years. Everyone in the study had used
cannabis from 10 to 19 days per month.

Although the quitters did better than users, all had attention impairments
in comparison with nonusers in a control group. The impairment was related
to the duration of use. Most disturbing was the fact that no improvement in
performance occurred with increasing abstinence.

It was no surprise, then, that because these long-term effects seem to be
irreversible, there is an effect on brain pathology. Because much of this
data comes from work with isolated systems, and therefore on all brains, an
obvious criticism is that you can't extrapolate from such data. Yet, the
evidence suggests that the long-term effects must have a physical basis. Is
there a safe dose of cannabis, with no effect on the brain? Even a dose
comparable to one joint, and analogous levels of the active THC ingredient
to that in plasma, can kill 50 percent of neurons in the hippocampus (an
area related to memory) within six days. People are unaware that the THC in
cannabis remains in the body for more than five days. For someone using
cannabis routinely, the dose carried in the body is higher than they
imagine. It is easy to underestimate the dose because of the wide range in
the strength of cannabis. Individual variations in body fat and,
worryingly, variations in one's disposition to psychosis, mean that you
cannot predict how much cannabis will affect any person at any time.

Cannabis could well be having a serious effect on the mind, which I define
as the personalization of brain circuits that reflect an individual's
experiences. A transmitterlike substance, with such powerful effects, must
affect those circuits. So blowing your mind might be exactly what marijuana
users are doing.
Member Comments
No member comments available...