NEVADA VOTERS EVENLY SPLIT ON POT ISSUE

Nevada voters are evenly split on a ballot initiative that would legalize
adult possession of 3 ounces or less of marijuana, a new poll shows.

But in Reno and Washoe County, a clear majority of residents oppose the
legalization of small amounts of marijuana, according to a Reno
Gazette-Journal/News 4 poll. The poll of 600 likely voters was conducted in
July by Rockville, Md.-based Research 2000.

Statewide, 48 percent of Nevadans support the ballot question that takes
marijuana beyond medical use approved two years ago; 48 percent oppose it.
Four percent were not sure.

Opposition rises to 58 percent in Washoe County and 54 percent in Reno, the
poll shows.

"We think it's good news," said Billy Rogers, spokesman for Nevadans for
Responsible Law Enforcement, the group pushing the ballot measure. "Based
on these results, I think it's likely we'll win this election."

Washoe County District Attorney Richard Gammick, who strongly opposes the
measure, expected the issue to have more support in Clark County than the
rest of Nevada.

"I expect conservatism runs a little more rampant in Washoe County and the
cow counties than in Clark County," Gammick said. "All these people leave
California to get away from that kind of stuff, and then when they get
here, they want to bring all that stuff with them."

Research 2000 President Del Ali said that, statewide, the issue appears to
be a dead heat. There are also very few undecided voters, who traditionally
tend to vote against ballot initiatives.

Twelve percent of those polled strongly disapprove of the measure compared
to 9 percent who strongly support it, noted Ali. Based on those numbers, he
thinks the measure will be voted down.

Initiative supporters have to spend a lot of money and time to get their
campaign right, Ali said.

"And they're going to have to give a real compelling reason why they want 3
ounces of marijuana made legal," he added.

While the marijuana issue had no gender gap, Democrats supported it much
more heavily than Republicans and independents, Ali said.

Support Among Medical Pot Users

In 1998 and 2000, Nevada voters approved licensing people who want to use
marijuana for medical reasons.

Rogers said his group believes law enforcement has better things to do than
arrest people for having small amounts of marijuana in their home. The 3
ounces is often associated with medical marijuana use.

The proposed law would forbid public use of marijuana and driving while
under the influence of marijuana. It would require prison sentences for
people who sell marijuana to children.

"This protects responsible people and punishes irresponsible people,"
Rogers said.

Gary Brown, a employee at Hippies pipe and incense shop in Sparks and the
14th person to receive a medical marijuana card in Nevada, said young
people are telling him they are registering to vote just so they can
support the marijuana question.

"I wish the government would lighten up on us," Brown said. "I consider
this to be truth in democracy. This is what this is about, people voting
for something they feel is worth voting for."

Brown said he was a Navy corpsman attached to the Marines in Vietnam in
April 1967 when he was injured in an ambush and left 70 percent disabled.

After Nevada law allowed marijuana use for medical reasons, Brown signed up
for the license that says he has a medical need to use medical marijuana.
As of July 8, the state had received 186 applications.

After work, as he starts relaxing for bed, Brown will take a few puffs of
marijuana to cope with the pain, he said. He said the marijuana is a
substitute for prescribed medication that makes him groggy.

While the latest initiative makes it legal for any adult to have up to 3
ounces of marijuana, Brown notes it also makes the state provide low-cost
marijuana for people who have medical needs for it. People with the medical
marijuana cards currently can grow up to seven plants at home, but it's
still illegal in Nevada for them to buy marijuana.

Brown wishes the proposal only allowed up to 2 ounces for adults because
that might get a wider range of support than the proposed 3 ounces.

"I think 2 ounces is great," Brown said. "It would have been an easier
number to swallow."

He's also glad the proposal limits the age to 21, like alcohol, because
that will do a better job of keeping it out of the hands of children.

"Eighteen is too young. I think 21 is still great," Brown said.

"It is a gateway drug for the younger people," Brown said of marijuana.
"But so is alcohol. Beer is a gateway drug and this state has one of the
highest alcoholism rates in the nation."

Officials Oppose

Gammick said telephone calls he's getting show people are confused and
believe the issue deals with medical marijuana only. It's to legalize up to
3 ounces for any adult, or as many as 90 marijuana cigarettes, Gammick said.

"This is not a small amount of marijuana for personal use," the district
attorney said.

Drug Enforcement Administration Director Asa Hutchinson came to Nevada last
month and said the initiative, if passed by voters, would encourage teens
to experiment with drugs and put Nevada in conflict with federal law.

Lisa Eggen of South Lake Tahoe said it is "about time" Nevada looked at
making possession of smaller amounts of marijuana legal.

"This is a state that has legalized prostitution and gives away alcohol,
and yet marijuana possession, until very recently, was a felony," Eggen said.

But Eggen was surprised the latest marijuana proposal has such strong
support statewide. She thinks it might be economically driven as people
look for something to offer in Nevada that can't be offered at Indian casinos.

Douglas M. Morrin of Reno fears the latest proposal will mean more people
on the streets driving dangerously while under the influence of marijuana.

"My attitude is that I don't like drugs, period," Morrin said. "If they
legalize 3 ounces, then they're going to carry 3 ounces all the time."

Given the rapid growth of Nevada, particularly by people relocated from
California, Morrin wasn't surprised by the support for the ballot question.

"Ten years ago I would have said you couldn't have gotten that passed,"
Morrin said.