Rave Radio: Offline (0/0)
Email: Password:
News (Media Awareness Project) - US FL: On Opposite Side Of Border, Opposite Side Of Pot Issue
Title:US FL: On Opposite Side Of Border, Opposite Side Of Pot Issue
Published On:2002-11-17
Source:St. Petersburg Times (FL)
Fetched On:2008-08-29 09:27:32
ON OPPOSITE SIDE OF BORDER, OPPOSITE SIDE OF POT ISSUE

Depending on which side of the U.S.-Canadian border you're on, the winds of
change are either blowing hard or barely at all when it comes to legalizing
marijuana.

In Canada, a Senate committee stunned the country in September when it said
anyone over 16 should be allowed to smoke marijuana. The recommendation was
all the more startling because it came not from a group of 20-something
potheads but lawmakers with an average age of 64.

But on Nov. 5, voters in Nevada overwhelmingly rejected a measure that
would have made it the first state to legalize marijuana use. Also defeated
were a decriminalization move in Arizona and a treatment-instead-of-jail
proposal in Ohio.

The votes were a blow to well-financed efforts to bring America closer in
line with other Western countries that treat marijuana use more as a public
health issue than a criminal one. Backers of Nevada's Question 9 -- who
included billionaire financier George Soros -- noted that 11-million
Americans regularly smoke marijuana and argued that they should not be
treated as criminals.

Given its image as a free-wheeling place where gambling and prostitution
have long been allowed, Nevada seemed the logical starting point for a
nationwide push to legalize marijuana. Had it been approved Nov. 5 and
again in 2004, the measure would have let adults possess up to 3 ounces of
marijuana, and required the Legislature to regulate it much like alcohol
and tobacco.

But U.S. drug czar John Walters made two trips to Nevada, adding his voice
to opponents who claimed legalization would encourage "drug tourism" and
add to the already high number of traffic deaths caused by drivers
purportedly stoned on marijuana. The defeat of Question 9 was also
attributed in part to a larger-than-usual turnout by Republicans, who tend
to be more conservative.

Some legalization foes saw the Nevada vote as a sign Americans have become
more introspective since the Sept. 11 attacks and now realize that drugs,
like terrorists, are destructive to their cherished way of life.

"Drugs destroy people, families, communities and can ultimately destroy
nations," said Calvina Fay of the St. Petersburg-based Drug Free America
Foundation.

But backers of Question 9 aren't giving up. While surprised by the margin
of the Nevada defeat, they were cheered that voters in San Francisco
overwhelmingly asked the city to explore providing marijuana to seriously
ill patients. California and several other states already have medical
marijuana laws, and efforts are under way to add New York, Vermont and
Maryland to the list in the next few years.

"We've always spent most of our time on medical marijuana and a little bit
of time on broader issues, and I think that's going to remain the same,"
says Rob Kampia, executive director of the Marijuana Policy Project, the
Washington, D.C., organization that sponsored Question 9.

Kampia says the project plans to "dump a couple hundred thousand dollars"
onto another front: legalizing, or at least decriminalizing, marijuana use
in Canada. Although that country has long been more tolerant of marijuana
than the United States, no one expected the Senate committee to recommend
changes that would make Canada's laws the most liberal in the world.

"In many ways prohibition is a cop-out," Sen. Pierre Claude Nolin said in
releasing the panel's report, which found that the marijuana ban has fueled
organized crime but done little to curb use. About 20,000 people are
arrested in Canada each year on marijuana-related charges.

Although the verdict is still out on marijuana's health effects, scientific
evidence indicates it is "substantially less harmful than alcohol and
should be treated not as a criminal issue but a social and public health
issue," Nolin said.

While stressing it did not condone drug use, the committee said smoking
marijuana should be a personal choice and recommended it be available to
anyone over 16 through a regulatory system like that for alcohol. The
senators also urged amnesty for the 600,000 Canadians with
marijuana-related convictions.

Although the report was hailed by many -- "I'm blown away," said Mark
Emery, Canada's best-known pot activist -- it also drew sharp criticism.
"It's a back-to-school gift for drug pushers," David Griffin of the
Canadian Police Association told the Toronto Star.

In deciding whether to change the law, Canada's Parliament will also
consider a soon-to-be-released report by a House of Commons committee. It
is expected to recommend the less drastic step of decriminalizing marijuana
use -- imposing fines but not jail time.

Any move to loosen Canadian drug laws will be opposed by the United States,
which is already struggling to contain the huge flow of marijuana from
British Columbia. But Kampia of the Marijuana Policy Project predicts
Canada will resist U.S. pressure and decriminalize marijuana by summer. And
that, he says, would boost efforts to do the same on this side of the border.

"Canadian culture is so similar to American that if Canadians can do it,
why can't we? I think it will send a positive message to the American
people that marijuana policy reform is not such a crazy idea."

- -- Susan Taylor Martin can be contacted at susan@sptimes.com
Member Comments
No member comments available...