News (Media Awareness Project) - US CA: Editorial: Feds Wrong on Rosenthal Redux |
Title: | US CA: Editorial: Feds Wrong on Rosenthal Redux |
Published On: | 2003-07-08 |
Source: | San Francisco Chronicle (CA) |
Fetched On: | 2008-08-24 20:31:12 |
FEDS WRONG ON ROSENTHAL REDUX
OH, FOR HEAVEN'S SAKE, why don't the feds just give it a rest?
Not satisfied with seeing Ed Rosenthal convicted of a felony for growing
medicine for the sick with the knowledge and approval of a local
government, the boors at the U.S. Justice Department have decided they
don't like the one-day sentence Rosenthal got. Last week they appealed U.S.
District Judge Charles Breyer's decision. Prosecutors had wanted the
58-year-old sent away for six and a half years.
Rosenthal, for years a prominent authority and prolific writer on the
cultivation of marijuana, was sentenced June 4 in a case that harshly
highlighted the philosophical chasm between California voters and
absolutist elements in the federal war on drugs.
Rosenthal was convicted of three counts of growing pot in an Oakland
warehouse. The crop was destined for a San Francisco medical-marijuana
dispensary.
In a trial bizarrely dissonant with reality, Rosenthal's lawyers were
forbidden from telling jurors why he was growing marijuana, and any mention
of medicinal use was stricken from the record. California's 1996
medical-marijuana law was kept out of the courtroom altogether because the
federal government does not recognize the state law.
There are a number of reasons the Justice Department should back off.
First, and perhaps legally foremost, is that this is a matter of states'
rights. Rosenthal was not engaged in interstate or international commerce,
nor was he interfering in the relations among sovereign nations. Because
Rosenthal's operation was conducted entirely within the state of
California, the federal government by rights ought to let California decide
what to do - or not do - about his pot crop.
Second, on that count state and local voters have been quite clear: They do
not want people stuck in the penitentiary for growing medical marijuana.
Third is the practical matter of money. The federal campaign against
Rosenthal and against the will of California voters is unlikely to be
successful, and this mean-spirited attempt to revive a losing case is only
throwing good money after bad.
OH, FOR HEAVEN'S SAKE, why don't the feds just give it a rest?
Not satisfied with seeing Ed Rosenthal convicted of a felony for growing
medicine for the sick with the knowledge and approval of a local
government, the boors at the U.S. Justice Department have decided they
don't like the one-day sentence Rosenthal got. Last week they appealed U.S.
District Judge Charles Breyer's decision. Prosecutors had wanted the
58-year-old sent away for six and a half years.
Rosenthal, for years a prominent authority and prolific writer on the
cultivation of marijuana, was sentenced June 4 in a case that harshly
highlighted the philosophical chasm between California voters and
absolutist elements in the federal war on drugs.
Rosenthal was convicted of three counts of growing pot in an Oakland
warehouse. The crop was destined for a San Francisco medical-marijuana
dispensary.
In a trial bizarrely dissonant with reality, Rosenthal's lawyers were
forbidden from telling jurors why he was growing marijuana, and any mention
of medicinal use was stricken from the record. California's 1996
medical-marijuana law was kept out of the courtroom altogether because the
federal government does not recognize the state law.
There are a number of reasons the Justice Department should back off.
First, and perhaps legally foremost, is that this is a matter of states'
rights. Rosenthal was not engaged in interstate or international commerce,
nor was he interfering in the relations among sovereign nations. Because
Rosenthal's operation was conducted entirely within the state of
California, the federal government by rights ought to let California decide
what to do - or not do - about his pot crop.
Second, on that count state and local voters have been quite clear: They do
not want people stuck in the penitentiary for growing medical marijuana.
Third is the practical matter of money. The federal campaign against
Rosenthal and against the will of California voters is unlikely to be
successful, and this mean-spirited attempt to revive a losing case is only
throwing good money after bad.
Member Comments |
No member comments available...