News (Media Awareness Project) - US OH: Make It Legal |
Title: | US OH: Make It Legal |
Published On: | 2006-12-04 |
Source: | Sandusky Register,The (OH) |
Fetched On: | 2008-01-12 20:23:17 |
MAKE IT LEGAL
Business is always good. That's what Capt. Greg P. Majoy commander of
the Erie County Drug Task says when you ask him about his job. The
task force may disband because of a lack of money for staffing, but
the reality is if there were 100 members on it, there still would be a
drug problem in Erie County and the rest of the nation.
Majoy, a straight shooter, doesn't make any bones about it. Arrest one
drug dealer, and someone else will step up to fill the vaccum. Major
cocaine dealers (by Sandusky standards) Ladonte Skelton and Shaunsay
J. Gowdy have gone to prison in the last year, and the drugs continue
to flow.
It's simple. As long as there is supply there will be
demand.
Some 40 years after harsh Rockefeller drug laws were enacted, what we
have to show for prohibition? It has worked as well at stopping drug
use as it did alcohol use.
Who has benefitted? Not the thousands of non-violent addicts behind
bars who would be better off with treatment rather than prison. Not
the taxpayers who are paying to keep drug addicts behind bars even
though they would pay far less for drug treatment.
So who has profited? The drug dealers, the banks that launder their
money and the politicians who pass draconian drug laws so they can
appear tough on crime and get re-elected. Meanwhile, the U.S. leads
the world with some 2.2 million prisoners primarily because of new
drug laws that quadrupled the prison population since 1985.
The drug war has destroyed far more lives than it saved. The potency
of drugs like heroin is up, and despite more post- Sept. 11 seizures
because of increased security, drugs are still easy to find.
Legalizing drugs would not eliminate the problems associated with
them, but it would drastically reduce the problem. Remember that
society's attitude about drugs was not always so strict, and we
managed to survive as a nation.
Washington grew hemp on his farm, cocaine used to be an ingredient in
Coca-Cola and morphine was used to treat wounded soldiers until they
started getting addicted to it.
The nation would not go to hell in a handbasket if we legalized drugs.
Why risk getting arrested buying them on the street when you can
purchase them at CVS? The taxes would help pay for treatment for
people who want to get off of them.
Laws against people younger than 18 using drugs would remain, and it
would still be illegal to mug old ladies or rob convenience stores to
feed your habit, but if someone wants to smoke pot, snort cocaine or
shoot heroin in the privacy of his or her home, why is that anyone
else's business?
Legalization would eliminate casual users from getting arrested,
unclogging prisons, and freeing up police to go after predators, which
is what they prefer to be doing. There would be less horror stories
like the grandmother recently killed in Atlanta after shooting it out
with police who entered her home with a no-knock warrant in what her
family believes was a case of mistaken identity.
Majoy thinks legalization is the equivalent of giving up on people. He
cites the drug user and drug dealer he busted who turned her life
around and is now getting her master's degree. I feel there are people
who can turn their lives around, Majoy said last week.
But he concedes that is difficult to turn their lives around because
of the lack of proper drug treatment. He is tired of busting people
whose fathers and grandfathers he arrested.
Legalization would provide the money for better drug treatment which
is not a panacea -- rich people who usually get the best drug
treatment still have relapses -- but it costs a lot less than prison.
And most of the people we send to prison are going to get out, so we
should increase the chances they will contribute to the community, not
prey on it.
Business is always good. That's what Capt. Greg P. Majoy commander of
the Erie County Drug Task says when you ask him about his job. The
task force may disband because of a lack of money for staffing, but
the reality is if there were 100 members on it, there still would be a
drug problem in Erie County and the rest of the nation.
Majoy, a straight shooter, doesn't make any bones about it. Arrest one
drug dealer, and someone else will step up to fill the vaccum. Major
cocaine dealers (by Sandusky standards) Ladonte Skelton and Shaunsay
J. Gowdy have gone to prison in the last year, and the drugs continue
to flow.
It's simple. As long as there is supply there will be
demand.
Some 40 years after harsh Rockefeller drug laws were enacted, what we
have to show for prohibition? It has worked as well at stopping drug
use as it did alcohol use.
Who has benefitted? Not the thousands of non-violent addicts behind
bars who would be better off with treatment rather than prison. Not
the taxpayers who are paying to keep drug addicts behind bars even
though they would pay far less for drug treatment.
So who has profited? The drug dealers, the banks that launder their
money and the politicians who pass draconian drug laws so they can
appear tough on crime and get re-elected. Meanwhile, the U.S. leads
the world with some 2.2 million prisoners primarily because of new
drug laws that quadrupled the prison population since 1985.
The drug war has destroyed far more lives than it saved. The potency
of drugs like heroin is up, and despite more post- Sept. 11 seizures
because of increased security, drugs are still easy to find.
Legalizing drugs would not eliminate the problems associated with
them, but it would drastically reduce the problem. Remember that
society's attitude about drugs was not always so strict, and we
managed to survive as a nation.
Washington grew hemp on his farm, cocaine used to be an ingredient in
Coca-Cola and morphine was used to treat wounded soldiers until they
started getting addicted to it.
The nation would not go to hell in a handbasket if we legalized drugs.
Why risk getting arrested buying them on the street when you can
purchase them at CVS? The taxes would help pay for treatment for
people who want to get off of them.
Laws against people younger than 18 using drugs would remain, and it
would still be illegal to mug old ladies or rob convenience stores to
feed your habit, but if someone wants to smoke pot, snort cocaine or
shoot heroin in the privacy of his or her home, why is that anyone
else's business?
Legalization would eliminate casual users from getting arrested,
unclogging prisons, and freeing up police to go after predators, which
is what they prefer to be doing. There would be less horror stories
like the grandmother recently killed in Atlanta after shooting it out
with police who entered her home with a no-knock warrant in what her
family believes was a case of mistaken identity.
Majoy thinks legalization is the equivalent of giving up on people. He
cites the drug user and drug dealer he busted who turned her life
around and is now getting her master's degree. I feel there are people
who can turn their lives around, Majoy said last week.
But he concedes that is difficult to turn their lives around because
of the lack of proper drug treatment. He is tired of busting people
whose fathers and grandfathers he arrested.
Legalization would provide the money for better drug treatment which
is not a panacea -- rich people who usually get the best drug
treatment still have relapses -- but it costs a lot less than prison.
And most of the people we send to prison are going to get out, so we
should increase the chances they will contribute to the community, not
prey on it.
Member Comments |
No member comments available...