News (Media Awareness Project) - US CA: Judge Won't Shield Drug-Case Doctor |
Title: | US CA: Judge Won't Shield Drug-Case Doctor |
Published On: | 2004-07-09 |
Source: | Sacramento Bee (CA) |
Fetched On: | 2008-08-22 05:48:57 |
JUDGE WON'T SHIELD DRUG-CASE DOCTOR
The Physician Was Reportedly Taped Offering to Sell a Pot-Growing Kit to an
Undercover Agent.
SAN FRANCISCO - A judge here refused on Thursday to block a threatened
drug-dealing prosecution against Dr. Molly Fry, who recommended marijuana
to patients at a clinic in Cool and may have sold them pot-growing kits.
"If somebody's innocent, they get vindicated at trial," U.S. District Judge
William Alsup told Fry, who could be charged in federal court in Sacramento.
Fry asked for a temporary restraining order in San Francisco because Alsup
four years ago issued an injunction barring federal drug authorities from
harassing doctors who recommend pot to their patients under Proposition
215, California's medical marijuana initiative.
The injunction has been upheld on appeal.
But Alsup, clearly skeptical of Fry's claims of innocence, said it didn't
bar the case against her.
"They were recommending it; they weren't supplying marijuana," he said,
describing the doctors protected by his order.
Fry, who denies involvement with drug sales, also sought a contempt order
against the government, saying it violated Alsup's injunction by framing
her. She asked additionally that Alsup restore her federal registration to
prescribe drugs, which was revoked by the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration.
Alsup said she should appeal the license revocation within the DEA.
And, although he didn't foreclose the contempt claim, he gave Fry no
encouragement it would succeed.
Defense lawyer Laurence Lichter offered declarations from Fry and her
husband, attorney Dale Schafer, to show the government's charges were a sham.
But Alsup was wary. He said he doubted the government would lie about its
evidence, which allegedly includes a tape recording of Fry offering to sell
a pot-growing kit to an undercover agent.
He took the highly unusual step of telling both Fry and Schafer to consult
two lawyers before making declarations under oath.
"People go to prison for a long time for committing perjury," he said.
The Physician Was Reportedly Taped Offering to Sell a Pot-Growing Kit to an
Undercover Agent.
SAN FRANCISCO - A judge here refused on Thursday to block a threatened
drug-dealing prosecution against Dr. Molly Fry, who recommended marijuana
to patients at a clinic in Cool and may have sold them pot-growing kits.
"If somebody's innocent, they get vindicated at trial," U.S. District Judge
William Alsup told Fry, who could be charged in federal court in Sacramento.
Fry asked for a temporary restraining order in San Francisco because Alsup
four years ago issued an injunction barring federal drug authorities from
harassing doctors who recommend pot to their patients under Proposition
215, California's medical marijuana initiative.
The injunction has been upheld on appeal.
But Alsup, clearly skeptical of Fry's claims of innocence, said it didn't
bar the case against her.
"They were recommending it; they weren't supplying marijuana," he said,
describing the doctors protected by his order.
Fry, who denies involvement with drug sales, also sought a contempt order
against the government, saying it violated Alsup's injunction by framing
her. She asked additionally that Alsup restore her federal registration to
prescribe drugs, which was revoked by the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration.
Alsup said she should appeal the license revocation within the DEA.
And, although he didn't foreclose the contempt claim, he gave Fry no
encouragement it would succeed.
Defense lawyer Laurence Lichter offered declarations from Fry and her
husband, attorney Dale Schafer, to show the government's charges were a sham.
But Alsup was wary. He said he doubted the government would lie about its
evidence, which allegedly includes a tape recording of Fry offering to sell
a pot-growing kit to an undercover agent.
He took the highly unusual step of telling both Fry and Schafer to consult
two lawyers before making declarations under oath.
"People go to prison for a long time for committing perjury," he said.
Member Comments |
No member comments available...