POT LAWS ARE A DOMESTIC MATTER

U.S. Ambassador Should Pay More Attention To The Laws On The Books In
His Own Country

On most issues affecting the U.S. and Canada, Paul Cellucci is a model
of common sense. Despite our differences over things like same-sex
marriage and lumber, he says, what sets us apart is only that "Canada
is a little more liberal than the United States; the United States is
a little more conservative."

But turn to the subject of marijuana, and the outgoing U.S. ambassador
loses his logical composure. He also comes perilously close to
interfering in the way we conduct our domestic affairs.

"Why, when we're trying to take pressure off the border, would Canada
pass a law that would put pressure on the border?" Cellucci asked this
week.

Translation: If we persist in making possession of a minuscule amount of pot
no longer a crime, Canadian tourists and exporters are going to face even
longer delays at the border.

The ambassador predicts U.S. border authorities will be stopping more
vehicles, especially if they're being driven by young people -- young
people, apparently, are automatically suspected of
drug-smuggling.

His excellency points out that U.S. customs, immigration and security
officials already have their hands full at border crossings trying to
keep prospective terrorists out.

In that case, why would they divert all this extra attention suddenly
to the already thriving cross-border trade in marijuana?

Just because Parliament has decided treating kids like criminals for
passing around a joint at a party doesn't really do much to stop drug
trafficking either here or in the U.S.

And Cellucci knows full well that in the proposed law the
"decriminalization" of simple possession is balanced by tougher
penalties for those who do the trafficking -- you'd think he'd be a
little more appreciative of what we're trying to do.

There's an element of kettle as well as pot to all of this. About a
dozen U.S. states, including California and New York, have removed
criminal sanctions from marijuana possession and there's little
evidence of border slowdowns between those that have and those that
haven't.

Under our proposed law, criminal sanctions would still apply for
anyone caught with more than 15 grams of pot. In most U.S. states that
have adopted some measure of decriminalization, people are still be
able to get off with fines for having up to 28.35 grams. In Ohio, the
limit is 100 grams, and selling up to 20 grams is regarded as simple
possession.

Besides New York and Ohio, other states bordering Canada that have
eased pot laws more than we're about to do include Minnesota, Maine
and Alaska where the lowest penalties are imposed for possession of up
to 226 grams. It's a wonder we haven't put delays on Americans at our
borders to keep the potheads out -- but, of course, we don't have the
resources.

In the land of the free, U.S. presidents can't bully the states into
their own conservative agendas.

That's what makes the attempts of a U.S. ambassador to bully a
bordering nation out of its more liberal policies so much more outrageous.

Kindly butt out, Mr. Ambassador.