News (Media Awareness Project) - US CA: Column: Time To Take Pot Back To The Polls? |
Title: | US CA: Column: Time To Take Pot Back To The Polls? |
Published On: | 2006-12-14 |
Source: | North County Times (Escondido, CA) |
Fetched On: | 2008-01-12 19:37:25 |
TIME TO TAKE POT BACK TO THE POLLS?
Democracy In Action, It Surely Isn't.
I'm not entirely clear whose interests the politicos on the San Diego
County Board of Supervisors think they're representing when they file
suit to overturn a law passed by the voters.
In fact, it's not particularly clear that they know what they're doing.
Earlier this week, the supervisors decided to appeal a court ruling
that had dismissed the county's lawsuit against a state law that
legalized medicinal use of marijuana.
The supes' argument, such as it is, goes like this: Since federal law
still bans marijuana, the county should not be bound by state law
allowing it. That, in fact, the state law should be thrown out.
The judge who heard the initial round in this ridiculous bout of
political posturing ---- you do all realize we're paying for the
lawyers on both sides of this lawsuit? ---- ruled that since the
state law doesn't prohibit or interfere with federal agents from
enforcing federal law within California, that the Compassionate Use
Act does not violate federal law.
It simply contradicts it.
While such a contradiction between state and federal law might drive
a legal philosopher around the bend with its lack of consistency, the
rest of us ought to be able to live with it.
Particularly those we elect to carry out our wishes.
And it's not as if San Diego voters disagreed with the rest of the
state: The Compassionate Use Act was created by ballot measure in
1996, and some 52 percent of San Diego County voters supported it.
(Statewide, the measure passed with 54 percent support.)
That's still a majority, no?
On the other hand, this is at least partially our own fault ---- we
did, after all, elect the folks currently sitting on the Board of
Supervisors and thumbing their noses at us. And spending tens of
thousands of our dollars on a lawsuit that basically tells us where
to stick our silly little ideas on democracy.
Obviously, Bill Horn's handy re-election last summer in the face of
his unwillingness to abide by voters' decisions means that the supes
have little to fear in terms of backlash on this issue. Yes, we in
the electorate want medicinal use of pot to be legal ---- but we're
not going to get all worked up over it and throw anyone out of office
for defying us.
So the ongoing requests from medical use activists for the county to
drop this asinine lawsuit are likely to fall on deaf (or at least
hubristic) ears.
Does that leave the rest of us ---- those who still believe in things
like democracy and, oh, I don't know, sanity maybe? ---- with no options?
Not necessarily.
Perhaps another ballot measure, this one directing the Board of
Supervisors to drop the lawsuit against the Compassionate Use Act and
obey its provisions, could be placed before county voters.
Assuming voters haven't changed their minds since the state measure
was passed a decade ago, it might be that such a vote would be a
clear enough message that even our local supervisors could understand it.
And hopefully act on it.
Democracy In Action, It Surely Isn't.
I'm not entirely clear whose interests the politicos on the San Diego
County Board of Supervisors think they're representing when they file
suit to overturn a law passed by the voters.
In fact, it's not particularly clear that they know what they're doing.
Earlier this week, the supervisors decided to appeal a court ruling
that had dismissed the county's lawsuit against a state law that
legalized medicinal use of marijuana.
The supes' argument, such as it is, goes like this: Since federal law
still bans marijuana, the county should not be bound by state law
allowing it. That, in fact, the state law should be thrown out.
The judge who heard the initial round in this ridiculous bout of
political posturing ---- you do all realize we're paying for the
lawyers on both sides of this lawsuit? ---- ruled that since the
state law doesn't prohibit or interfere with federal agents from
enforcing federal law within California, that the Compassionate Use
Act does not violate federal law.
It simply contradicts it.
While such a contradiction between state and federal law might drive
a legal philosopher around the bend with its lack of consistency, the
rest of us ought to be able to live with it.
Particularly those we elect to carry out our wishes.
And it's not as if San Diego voters disagreed with the rest of the
state: The Compassionate Use Act was created by ballot measure in
1996, and some 52 percent of San Diego County voters supported it.
(Statewide, the measure passed with 54 percent support.)
That's still a majority, no?
On the other hand, this is at least partially our own fault ---- we
did, after all, elect the folks currently sitting on the Board of
Supervisors and thumbing their noses at us. And spending tens of
thousands of our dollars on a lawsuit that basically tells us where
to stick our silly little ideas on democracy.
Obviously, Bill Horn's handy re-election last summer in the face of
his unwillingness to abide by voters' decisions means that the supes
have little to fear in terms of backlash on this issue. Yes, we in
the electorate want medicinal use of pot to be legal ---- but we're
not going to get all worked up over it and throw anyone out of office
for defying us.
So the ongoing requests from medical use activists for the county to
drop this asinine lawsuit are likely to fall on deaf (or at least
hubristic) ears.
Does that leave the rest of us ---- those who still believe in things
like democracy and, oh, I don't know, sanity maybe? ---- with no options?
Not necessarily.
Perhaps another ballot measure, this one directing the Board of
Supervisors to drop the lawsuit against the Compassionate Use Act and
obey its provisions, could be placed before county voters.
Assuming voters haven't changed their minds since the state measure
was passed a decade ago, it might be that such a vote would be a
clear enough message that even our local supervisors could understand it.
And hopefully act on it.
Member Comments |
No member comments available...