Rave Radio: Offline (0/0)
Email: Password:
News (Media Awareness Project) - US WA: OPED: Congress Should Butt Out On Medical Marijuana
Title:US WA: OPED: Congress Should Butt Out On Medical Marijuana
Published On:2005-08-16
Source:Seattle Post-Intelligencer (WA)
Fetched On:2008-08-19 22:29:48
CONGRESS SHOULD BUTT OUT ON MEDICAL MARIJUANA

Congress, Butt Out

The balance between the powers of the states and the powers of the federal
government was tipped toward the latter by the U.S. Supreme Court's recent
decision on medical marijuana. As a state, Washington has the right to push
back. And, as a state with a citizen-approved medical marijuana law, we
should, if for no other reason than to assert our powers under the 10th
Amendment to make our own decisions. We can begin by sending a formal
message to Congress, and one is ready for my fellow legislators to consider.

The question isn't whether marijuana has medicinal value. Washington voters
addressed that when a majority agreed with Initiative 692's position that
"some patients with terminal or debilitating illnesses, under their
physician's care, may benefit from the medical use of marijuana." For I-692
supporters and those who oppose all marijuana use, the real question is
whether to resist the expansion of federal power the court ruling
represents, on the grounds that states should decide what's best for the
health and safety of their citizens.

If a state chooses to defer to the feds on medical marijuana, fine. But
Washington chose to try a medical marijuana law, and it deserves protection
from federal encroachment like any of our laws, such as the 1996 "Two
Strikes" law for sex offenders. Do we want the feds telling us our
penalties for murderers or rapists are too tough? The issue's the same.

The Supreme Court ruled in a California case that Congress' authority over
interstate commerce lets the federal government prohibit Californians' use
of medical marijuana even if it's grown inside the state in compliance with
California law.

Maybe the justices were simply being consistent with federal drug laws,
which allow for medicinal use of narcotics (think methadone) but not
marijuana. Regardless, our recourse is not to appeal the court's ruling but
instead appeal to Congress to amend the laws underpinning that ruling.

State legislators from around the country are in Seattle for their national
conference this week, and they'll get to see a measure drafted for our 2006
legislative session. It asks Congress to let Washington and other states
decide for themselves whether marijuana may be used for medical purposes,
and perhaps it'll inspire more states to stand up for their 10th Amendment
powers.

A great thing about our federalist system of government is that any state,
with its citizens' consent, may experiment with liberty to test innovative
new ideas, without putting the rest of the nation at risk. Marijuana has
been used for seven years in Washington for medical purposes under specific
conditions, yet no one is asserting it's caused social or criminal problems.

But no matter what you believe about marijuana, it's likely that given the
choice between setting their own rules and deferring to authorities in the
"other Washington," the people of Washington would prefer to exercise the
powers reserved to us, as a state, under the Bill of Rights. It's time to
send that message.

State Rep. Toby Nixon, R-Kirkland, represents the 45th District and is
ranking member on the House State Government Operations and Accountability
Committee.
Member Comments
No member comments available...