News (Media Awareness Project) - Canada: Editorial: Bordering On Indifference |
Title: | Canada: Editorial: Bordering On Indifference |
Published On: | 2005-11-07 |
Source: | National Post (Canada) |
Fetched On: | 2008-08-19 06:29:52 |
BORDERING ON INDIFFERENCE
Most people who cross the Canada-U.S. border pose no risk whatsoever.
The mission of border guards should be to root out the small number
of travellers who do.
This is an approach the Americans generally abide by in attempting to
keep terrorist threats, drug traffickers and other undesirables out.
But based on a report presented this past Monday to Canada's Standing
Senate Committee on National Security and Defence, the same can't be
said for our country.
According to Canadian border agents, the existing Border Management
Plan does not encourage them to identify and thoroughly search
suspicious travellers; instead, it actively discourages them from
doing so. With managers' bonuses tied to quotas based on the number
of searches conducted, and an effort to conduct border operations on
the cheap, guards wind up favouring easy, superficial searches --
often of those who pose little potential threat. As a brief prepared
for the Senate committee outlines: "This 'numbers game' is a public
relations exercise that focuses on having more searches performed
rather than on finding anything."
Further discouraging proper targeting of genuine security threats is
the fact Canadian border guards are unarmed. As a result, guards
sometimes shy away from dangerous situations, including a recent
incident in which 110 Ontario guards stepped down rather than
confront an armed escapee believed to be heading to the border from
the U.S. side.
Our agents' focus on collecting duties rather than defending national
security is also problematic. As anyone who has driven into Canada
from the United States can attest, there is often far more interest
in whether one has purchased alcohol or tobacco than whether guns,
drugs or other truly dangerous items are being transported.
What is needed at our borders is a wholesale change in philosophy. At
present, Canada's approach is still rooted in a bygone era in which
travellers exceeding their shopping quota really was the biggest
concern. While our neighbours have vastly ramped up their security
post-9/11, for the most part we're still acting as though it's the
same old world.
Canadian border guards need not clog the borders with excessive
screenings of every vehicle that passes through. But they could
usefully borrow some of the U.S. techiques -- including thorough
rather than superficial searches of suspicious vehicles, lines of
questioning designed to trip up those lying about their destinations
and intents and, yes, a degree of profiling to ensure they don't
waste their time probing travellers who pose no threat.
These changes are not up to individual guards to undertake on their
own. In addition to guns, they must be armed by their superiors with
a new focus on defending Canadians' security.
Most people who cross the Canada-U.S. border pose no risk whatsoever.
The mission of border guards should be to root out the small number
of travellers who do.
This is an approach the Americans generally abide by in attempting to
keep terrorist threats, drug traffickers and other undesirables out.
But based on a report presented this past Monday to Canada's Standing
Senate Committee on National Security and Defence, the same can't be
said for our country.
According to Canadian border agents, the existing Border Management
Plan does not encourage them to identify and thoroughly search
suspicious travellers; instead, it actively discourages them from
doing so. With managers' bonuses tied to quotas based on the number
of searches conducted, and an effort to conduct border operations on
the cheap, guards wind up favouring easy, superficial searches --
often of those who pose little potential threat. As a brief prepared
for the Senate committee outlines: "This 'numbers game' is a public
relations exercise that focuses on having more searches performed
rather than on finding anything."
Further discouraging proper targeting of genuine security threats is
the fact Canadian border guards are unarmed. As a result, guards
sometimes shy away from dangerous situations, including a recent
incident in which 110 Ontario guards stepped down rather than
confront an armed escapee believed to be heading to the border from
the U.S. side.
Our agents' focus on collecting duties rather than defending national
security is also problematic. As anyone who has driven into Canada
from the United States can attest, there is often far more interest
in whether one has purchased alcohol or tobacco than whether guns,
drugs or other truly dangerous items are being transported.
What is needed at our borders is a wholesale change in philosophy. At
present, Canada's approach is still rooted in a bygone era in which
travellers exceeding their shopping quota really was the biggest
concern. While our neighbours have vastly ramped up their security
post-9/11, for the most part we're still acting as though it's the
same old world.
Canadian border guards need not clog the borders with excessive
screenings of every vehicle that passes through. But they could
usefully borrow some of the U.S. techiques -- including thorough
rather than superficial searches of suspicious vehicles, lines of
questioning designed to trip up those lying about their destinations
and intents and, yes, a degree of profiling to ensure they don't
waste their time probing travellers who pose no threat.
These changes are not up to individual guards to undertake on their
own. In addition to guns, they must be armed by their superiors with
a new focus on defending Canadians' security.
Member Comments |
No member comments available...