News (Media Awareness Project) - CN BC: Drug Tests More Frequent At US-Based Companies |
Title: | CN BC: Drug Tests More Frequent At US-Based Companies |
Published On: | 2006-04-12 |
Source: | Victoria Times-Colonist (CN BC) |
Fetched On: | 2008-08-18 15:34:58 |
DRUG TESTS MORE FREQUENT AT U.S.-BASED COMPANIES
A University of Victoria survey of the controversial practice of
workplace drug testing shows the practice is most frequent in
Canadian companies that have their head office in the United States.
While Canada debates decriminalization of marijuana, in contrast to
the American war on drugs, the survey found provinces with the
highest percentage of firms with a U.S. head office -- B.C. and
Alberta -- also had the top levels of drug testing of employees.
This despite what the report's author said is a lack of evidence of
testing necessity or efficacy.
"A lot of U.S conglomerates coming up to Canada ... are trying to
adopt the same policies, but the laws are different here," said Dr.
Scott Macdonald, assistant director of research at the university's
Centre for Addictions Research of B.C. "In order to have drug testing
(in Canada), it has to be reasonably related to the requirements of the work."
Conducted in 2003, the first national survey questioned 565 human
resources managers responsible for at least 100 employees about their
drug testing policies, if any.
The survey discovered 10 per cent of the firms overall had drug
testing, with the highest provincial rate in Alberta at 25 per cent.
B.C. was second at 17.9 per cent and Ontario the lowest at 4.6 per cent.
Macdonald found U.S.-run firms were twice as likely -- 18.2 per cent
to 9.2 per cent -- to impose testing as those headquartered elsewhere.
Safety-sensitive sectors such as transportation, resource extraction
and construction were the most common worksites for drug tests.
However, a major Canadian investigative agency, the Transportation
Safety Board, has not detected any recreational drug-accident link.
"We haven't found a single accident where the causal factors were
alcohol-or drug-related," said the TSB's Jim Harris in "literally
thousands of investigations. That would go back about 15 years in
marine, rail, pipeline and aviation, the four modes in which we investigate."
It's a viewpoint Macdonald said is supported by the research.
"Drug testing programs are more ideological than evidence-based," he said.
A University of Victoria survey of the controversial practice of
workplace drug testing shows the practice is most frequent in
Canadian companies that have their head office in the United States.
While Canada debates decriminalization of marijuana, in contrast to
the American war on drugs, the survey found provinces with the
highest percentage of firms with a U.S. head office -- B.C. and
Alberta -- also had the top levels of drug testing of employees.
This despite what the report's author said is a lack of evidence of
testing necessity or efficacy.
"A lot of U.S conglomerates coming up to Canada ... are trying to
adopt the same policies, but the laws are different here," said Dr.
Scott Macdonald, assistant director of research at the university's
Centre for Addictions Research of B.C. "In order to have drug testing
(in Canada), it has to be reasonably related to the requirements of the work."
Conducted in 2003, the first national survey questioned 565 human
resources managers responsible for at least 100 employees about their
drug testing policies, if any.
The survey discovered 10 per cent of the firms overall had drug
testing, with the highest provincial rate in Alberta at 25 per cent.
B.C. was second at 17.9 per cent and Ontario the lowest at 4.6 per cent.
Macdonald found U.S.-run firms were twice as likely -- 18.2 per cent
to 9.2 per cent -- to impose testing as those headquartered elsewhere.
Safety-sensitive sectors such as transportation, resource extraction
and construction were the most common worksites for drug tests.
However, a major Canadian investigative agency, the Transportation
Safety Board, has not detected any recreational drug-accident link.
"We haven't found a single accident where the causal factors were
alcohol-or drug-related," said the TSB's Jim Harris in "literally
thousands of investigations. That would go back about 15 years in
marine, rail, pipeline and aviation, the four modes in which we investigate."
It's a viewpoint Macdonald said is supported by the research.
"Drug testing programs are more ideological than evidence-based," he said.
Member Comments |
No member comments available...