News (Media Awareness Project) - US IA: Judge Says Christian Prison Program Must End |
Title: | US IA: Judge Says Christian Prison Program Must End |
Published On: | 2006-06-03 |
Source: | Des Moines Register (IA) |
Fetched On: | 2008-08-18 10:20:41 |
JUDGE SAYS CHRISTIAN PRISON PROGRAM MUST END
InnerChange Freedom Initiative Will Continue At The Correctional
Center In Newton During An Appeal
A faith-based Iowa prison treatment program in which inmates immerse
themselves in evangelical Christianity is unconstitutional and must
be shut down, a federal judge said Friday.
U.S. District Judge Robert Pratt of Des Moines, in a 140-page ruling
with national implications, said the Innerchange Freedom Initiative
at the Newton Correctional Facility violates the First Amendment's
clause barring government from the establishment of religion.
Pratt said the Iowa Department of Corrections must close the program
within 60 days, and $1.5 million in contract payments must be
returned to state officials. However, those orders will be suspended
while an appeal is pending, the judge said.
The InnerChange program has operated at the Newton state prison since
October 1999, sponsored by Prison Fellowship Ministries. About 210
inmates spend their days in education, counseling and work, with a
heavy emphasis on Bible teachings.
Prison Fellowship contended the program was voluntary and it had the
secular benefits of improving inmate behavior, reducing recidivism
and protecting public safety.
The Rev. Barry Lynn, executive director of Americans United for
Separation of Church and State, praised the decision. His
organization, based in Washington, D.C., had sued on behalf of some
inmates and Iowa taxpayers, contending the program unconstitutionally
represents a merger of state and religion.
"We are absolutely delighted that the court found significant
constitutional defects in a government-funded prison program that
involves religious proselytizing or religious evangelism," Lynn said
Friday. "If the reasoning in this case is followed elsewhere, and I
suspect that it will be, it will pose an enormous challenge to
faith-based programs at the state and federal level in many kinds of
institutions."
The case has received national media attention as a test of President
Bush's push for faith-based government services, ranging from social
service agencies to after-school child care. Similar programs are
sponsored by Prison Fellowship Ministries at prisons in Texas,
Minnesota, Kansas and Arkansas.
Former Virginia Attorney General Mark Earley, president and chief
executive of Prison Fellowship Ministries, said his organization will
file an appeal next week with the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
in St. Louis.
The InnerChange program will continue at Newton while the appeal is
pending, he added.
"I think it is a shame that the court has ruled against one of the
few programs that have been demonstrated to offer real hope for
stemming the tide of habitual crime," Earley said. "At the same time,
the decision today, while disappointing, illuminates the course that
has to be taken to safeguard religious liberty; in this case, the
religious liberty of inmates and their opportunity to choose to
transform their lives by their faith-based choice."
The Iowa attorney general's office, which defended state prison
officials during the 14-day trial in Des Moines late last year, will
be reviewing the decision over the next few days, said spokesman
Robert Brammer.
Pratt's ruling said that for all practical purposes, the state had
"literally established an Evangelical Christian congregation within
the walls of one of its penal institutions." The Newton program gives
InnerChange employees "authority to control the spiritual, emotional
and physical lives of hundreds of Iowa inmates."
The judge said there are no adequate safeguards present, nor could
there be, to ensure that state money is not being directly spent to
indoctrinate Iowa inmates.
The state, through its direct funding of InnerChange, hopes to cure
recidivism through state-sponsored prayer and devotion, Pratt added.
"While such spiritual and emotional 'rewiring' may be possible in the
life of an individual and lower the risk of committing other crimes,
it cannot be permissible to force taxpayers to fund such an
enterprise under the Establishment Clause," he wrote.
InnerChange Freedom Initiative Will Continue At The Correctional
Center In Newton During An Appeal
A faith-based Iowa prison treatment program in which inmates immerse
themselves in evangelical Christianity is unconstitutional and must
be shut down, a federal judge said Friday.
U.S. District Judge Robert Pratt of Des Moines, in a 140-page ruling
with national implications, said the Innerchange Freedom Initiative
at the Newton Correctional Facility violates the First Amendment's
clause barring government from the establishment of religion.
Pratt said the Iowa Department of Corrections must close the program
within 60 days, and $1.5 million in contract payments must be
returned to state officials. However, those orders will be suspended
while an appeal is pending, the judge said.
The InnerChange program has operated at the Newton state prison since
October 1999, sponsored by Prison Fellowship Ministries. About 210
inmates spend their days in education, counseling and work, with a
heavy emphasis on Bible teachings.
Prison Fellowship contended the program was voluntary and it had the
secular benefits of improving inmate behavior, reducing recidivism
and protecting public safety.
The Rev. Barry Lynn, executive director of Americans United for
Separation of Church and State, praised the decision. His
organization, based in Washington, D.C., had sued on behalf of some
inmates and Iowa taxpayers, contending the program unconstitutionally
represents a merger of state and religion.
"We are absolutely delighted that the court found significant
constitutional defects in a government-funded prison program that
involves religious proselytizing or religious evangelism," Lynn said
Friday. "If the reasoning in this case is followed elsewhere, and I
suspect that it will be, it will pose an enormous challenge to
faith-based programs at the state and federal level in many kinds of
institutions."
The case has received national media attention as a test of President
Bush's push for faith-based government services, ranging from social
service agencies to after-school child care. Similar programs are
sponsored by Prison Fellowship Ministries at prisons in Texas,
Minnesota, Kansas and Arkansas.
Former Virginia Attorney General Mark Earley, president and chief
executive of Prison Fellowship Ministries, said his organization will
file an appeal next week with the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
in St. Louis.
The InnerChange program will continue at Newton while the appeal is
pending, he added.
"I think it is a shame that the court has ruled against one of the
few programs that have been demonstrated to offer real hope for
stemming the tide of habitual crime," Earley said. "At the same time,
the decision today, while disappointing, illuminates the course that
has to be taken to safeguard religious liberty; in this case, the
religious liberty of inmates and their opportunity to choose to
transform their lives by their faith-based choice."
The Iowa attorney general's office, which defended state prison
officials during the 14-day trial in Des Moines late last year, will
be reviewing the decision over the next few days, said spokesman
Robert Brammer.
Pratt's ruling said that for all practical purposes, the state had
"literally established an Evangelical Christian congregation within
the walls of one of its penal institutions." The Newton program gives
InnerChange employees "authority to control the spiritual, emotional
and physical lives of hundreds of Iowa inmates."
The judge said there are no adequate safeguards present, nor could
there be, to ensure that state money is not being directly spent to
indoctrinate Iowa inmates.
The state, through its direct funding of InnerChange, hopes to cure
recidivism through state-sponsored prayer and devotion, Pratt added.
"While such spiritual and emotional 'rewiring' may be possible in the
life of an individual and lower the risk of committing other crimes,
it cannot be permissible to force taxpayers to fund such an
enterprise under the Establishment Clause," he wrote.
Member Comments |
No member comments available...