Rave Radio: Offline (0/0)
Email: Password:
News (Media Awareness Project) - US HI: Teachers Divided By Proposed Drug Tests
Title:US HI: Teachers Divided By Proposed Drug Tests
Published On:2007-04-26
Source:Honolulu Advertiser (HI)
Fetched On:2008-08-17 04:28:05
TEACHERS DIVIDED BY PROPOSED DRUG TESTS

HILO, Hawai'i -- Teachers across the state have been in heated
debates this week over a proposed new contract provision that would
impose mandatory random and for-cause drug testing on teachers
statewide. Teachers are scheduled to vote today on whether to accept
the drug testing plan and the raises that are being offered with it.

Robert Dircks, principal at Hilo High School, said some of his staff
believe the drug testing is evidence of a "sellout" of teachers'
rights by the Hawaii State Teachers Association, while other teachers
are comfortable with drug testing and want the 8 percent raises and
the 3 percent salary step increase being offered in the two-year package.

Dircks, who won't be covered by the proposed contract, said he will
be glad when today's vote is over.

"I'm trying to act as a referee here, but when it starts impacting
instruction, I have a problem with that, and emotions are so high
that the kids are feeling it, and something's got to give here," he said.

Deborah Lynn Dickerson, a veteran counselor at Keonepoko Elementary
School in Puna on the Big Island, said Gov. Linda Lingle's demand for
the drug-testing program treats teachers as if they were parolees
subjected to mandatory testing after they are released from prison.

"I don't want it in my contract. I don't want to have my
constitutional rights taken away in exchange for what I consider a
piddly raise in the beginning," Dickerson said. "We have a right to
be treated as professionals."

Others are comfortable with the contract proposal. Steven Martin, a
veteran teacher at Waiakea Intermediate School, said he is inclined
to vote for it.

"I've looked at it, and I think it's a pretty good contract," said
Martin during a break from a union briefing in Hilo yesterday. "I
have no problems with it. ... The drug testing does not bother me."

HSTA Neutral

Roger Takabayashi, president of the HSTA, said he believes this is
the first time the union's board of directors has sent a tentative
contract to its members without a recommendation either for or
against the proposal.

He said the union chose that approach after delegates to the HSTA's
annual convention in Waikiki in mid-April split over the Lingle
administration's drug testing proposal. He said the administration
tied drug testing to pay raises and refused to sever the two issues.

Emotions ran high on both sides of the convention debates, and union
leadership concluded there needed to be a membership vote, Takabayashi said.

No Predictions

HSTA Executive Director Joan Husted said the outlook for the vote has
been shifting, but said she has "no idea" how it will finally turn out.

Takabayashi and Husted have both argued publicly in the past against
blanket drug testing of teachers, and Takabayashi said he does not
believe the public school system has a problem with teachers using drugs.

"I feel our children are safe in our public schools," he said.

If ratified, the agreement will require the HTSA to work with the
state to design drug testing procedures by June 30, 2008. Takabayashi
said the union would press for safeguards in the program because
"every effort has to be made to protect the individual rights of teachers."

The pay increases offered in the proposed contract would boost
starting pay for new teachers from $39,901 to $43,157. For mid-range
teachers with about 15 years of experience, a master's degree and
some additional credit hours, annual pay would increase from $59,566
today to $66,359 at the end of the contract.

For the most experienced teachers with more than 33 years on the job,
the proposed contract would boost pay from $73,197 to $79,170,
Takabayashi said.

The union representatives said they have been trying to quash a rumor
that the proposed contract would require retirees to pay for their
own medical coverage. They said that is false and is not part of the
tentative agreement up for a vote.

Teachers expressed concern yesterday at the possibility that false
positive drug tests could ruin their reputations, and some said they
believe Lingle is forcing the testing program on teachers to score
political points for herself. Others said they regard drug testing
for teachers as a waste of money in an education system they believe
is already underfunded.

Lingle Cites Safety

The Lingle administration has said the testing program "will help
ensure that schools are safe for students, faculty and staff, and
will increase parents' confidence that their children are being
taught in a drug-and-alcohol-free environment. The drug and alcohol
testing will also benefit teachers by helping those who might be
identified with problems to get necessary treatment."

Lingle spokesman Russell Pang declined further comment.

Teachers acknowledged a series of well-publicized arrests this year
of schoolteachers who allegedly used or sold drugs.

Leilani Nautu, a Ka'a'awa Elementary School teacher, said that "I
would have to agree that it's time for drug testing to make sure
those who are working with children and making important decisions
about children are drug tested."

However, she said teacher testing should be just the first step.

"I think they need to extend this to our administrators, including
top administrators in the state as well as Board of Ed members and
all the way up to legislators and government officials," Nautu said.
"These are all people who make decisions every day, and if they're
doing drugs, their judgment could be clouded, and we could have
decisions coming down that affect children all the way from the top."

No Justification Seen

Others argued the recent arrests don't justify a sweeping new
statewide drug testing program that targets only teachers.

"It's too bad that six people recently have caused the problem for
13,000 who are really trying to do a good job," said Michael Rohr, a
special-education English teacher at Hilo High. Rohr said a number of
his fellow teachers are unhappy with the testing requirement, but
said he can't gauge how the vote today is likely to turn out.

"It's hard to vote against your paycheck, and that's one of the
things a lot of people are really upset about," Rohr said.
Member Comments
No member comments available...