SAY 'YES' TO FAITH, 'NO' TO DRUGS

Nineteen percent of eighth graders, 36% of 10th graders, and 47% of
12th graders say they have used illegal drugs, according to a study
by the National Institute on Drug Abuse and the University of
Michigan. These numbers should scare the living daylights out of any
parent. But some may just shrug their shoulders and say what can I
do? Others will look to government institutions for help.

The White House Office of National Drug Control Policy, now in its
20th year, has consistently taken a diverse approach to combating
illegal drug use. Its outreach extends to parents and community
groups, and relies on celebrities and athletes to draw attention to
its mission.

To combat adolescent drug use, the White House has allocated $5.8
million in new federal grants for random drug testing in public
schools next year, its fifth grant award since 2003 for student drug
testing programs. These grants will expand random drug testing
programs into schools in 12 new states.

The White House recognizes, however, that testing alone will not
solve adolescents' drug problems and neither will a primary focus on
schools as the best method to reach teenagers. Their recent ad
campaign against teenagers' abuse of prescription drugs is a step in
the right direction, targeting not teenagers but the parents who may
not be aware of the prevalence of drug abuse among youth.

The new focus was a result of a costly and almost unforgiveable
mistake. Between 1998 and 2006, it spent $1.4 billion on anti-drug
ads. Unfortunately, a study for the government conducted by the
health survey research firm, Westat, Inc., found the effort failed
and may have compounded the problem.

"Greater exposure to the campaign was associated with weaker
anti-drug norms and increases in the perceptions that others use
marijuana," the study reported. Among 14- to 16-year-olds, more
exposure to the ads led to higher rates of first time drug use.

When delivered directly to adolescents, anti-drug messages fall on
deaf ears. Rather than wasting its own breath and our tax dollars,
the White House should mediate its worthwhile messages through
institutions that can deliver it effectively.

Mapping America, a project cataloguing the societal effects of the
family and church, has found that adolescents from broken homes are
much more likely to use hard drugs, according to data from the
National Longitudinal Sample of Adolescent Health.

Of adolescents who live with married or cohabiting parents or with an
always-single parent, up to 11% have used hard drugs. When their
living environment has been disrupted, however, that number shoots
up: 15% for adolescents living with divorcees, 18 % for those in
stepfamilies, and 19% for those living with one biological parent in
a cohabiting relationship.

Divorce and parental separation increase both the likelihood of
trying drugs and the amount of drug addiction and intravenous use,
according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Fourteen-year-olds of divorced parents are nearly four times more
likely to try illegal drugs and twice as likely to use them as adults.

What can be done?

Sometimes -- not always, but sometimes -- complex problems can be
addressed with simple solutions. In the case of teenager and
pre-teenager drug abuse, a little bit of faith can go a long way.

Church attendance has similar beneficial effects to at-risk youth.
Among American adolescents, 8% of at-least-weekly worshipers admit
using hard drugs. That number doubles to 16% for those who worship
less than monthly and 18% for those who never worship.

The National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia
University is now researching the success of anti-drug efforts led by
charismatic Evangelicals, particularly those in Assemblies of God
congregations, from which CASA hopes to draw "lessons on the role of
spirituality and religious beliefs in recovery."

CASA is on the right track. A diverse group of experts such as Mark
Regnerus, Glen Elder, Jerry Trusty, Richard Watts, and Lisa Pullen
agree that religious practice decreases the likelihood of drug use.
Barbara Yarnold of Florida International University has even said
that religion is the only statistically significant factor in
inhibiting adolescent cocaine use.

When the statistics for family structure and church attendance are
combined, the results are even more striking. Of at-least-monthly
worshipers from intact families, 8.5% have used hard drugs, but rises
to 20.1% for students from broken families who worship less or not at all.

The White House has a noble cause and a high calling to perform well.
It should continue waging its anti-drug campaign by educating
parents. In order to provide its services in a more meaningful way to
more adolescents, it must include in its efforts the vast network of
willing and like-minded churches and religious organizations.

Mr. Blackwell is a contributing editor of The New York Sun.