PROSECUTOR RESPONDS

What I say in a courtroom is recorded. Dr. Conner ("Your Views," June
19) should consult the record and not rely on third-hand information.

Every professional who deals with substance abusers knows that they
can be unreliable sources of information concerning their substance
abuse history.

Substance abusers, sometimes armed with prescriptions or medical
marijuana permits, come into court daily with "reasons" why they
should be allowed to use their drug of choice:

"I am a nervous person. I need to keep drinking for my nerves. I need
to drive to see my doctor about my nerves."

"I was injured while driving under the influence of marijuana and
alcohol. I need to smoke because of the pain from my injuries."

"Yes, cocaine is bad but heroin should be legal."

"I have reduced my crystal methamphetamine usage to $20 per day but I
need that amount to control my weight."

"I have tried all kinds of anti-psychotic medications. Jim Beam works
best for me."

I do not recommend such statements at a sentencing hearing unless you
like institutional food.

Even a prescription or permit authorized by the surgeon general of
the United States will be challenged by prosecutors when a long
history of substance abuse is present.

If Dr. Conner feels picked upon because of challenges to her
prescriptions or permits, it is reflective of the volume of her
practice and not personal animus.

Am I biased concerning women of color? Absolutely, my
great-grandmother was a woman of color. My wife and my daughters are
women of color.

Ricky R. Damerville

Hilo