DECADES AFTER WOODSTOCK, THE POT DEBATE STILL RAGES

Re: Barbara Kay vs. Mary Jane, editorial, May 23.

My late teenage years were spent at a U. S. college, playing in a
rock band, sleeping in the mud at Woodstock and frequently
participating in the newly discovered recreational activity of
smoking dope. It took a couple of years, but I eventually came to the
realization that my personality was undergoing change for the worse,
my confidence was sagging and my thinking process becoming less
cohesive. Thus, for the most part, I gave up pot in 1969.

My observation was that for those who didn't, regular marijuana use
often resulted in a deep disconnect from society, their families and
even themselves. Frequent users sought the company of those who
shared their habit, while non-users become less desirable as friends
because they were straight. Paranoia was rampant. The negative
effects of pot may not appear as quickly as an alcohol-fuelled auto
accident, but I have no doubt that it takes a dangerous toll over the
years. Those who smoke for long periods are usually not aware of
their diminished personality, limited thinking process and boring insights.

The idea of legalization marijuana is an agenda being moved forward
by a minority of vocal citizens and self-interest groups. Adding
legal pot to cigarettes and alcohol is a recipe for disaster that, if
allowed, would put future generations at an ever greater risk for
self-destruction.

Barry Lubotta, Toronto.