INSITE MAKES OTTAWA UNEASY

The clock is ticking on the future of one of Canada's most important
and unique attempts to deal with drug addiction, and perhaps that's a
good thing.

It may very well be good that the federal government is sending
signals it will soon no longer support Vancouver's supervised
injection facility (Insite). Getting Ottawa out of the picture may
actually create some certainty and stability for the controversial
facility in Vancouver's notorious Downtown Eastside.

That's because Health Minister George Abbott has said the province
supports the facility remaining open, which suggests the B.C.
government is willing to operate it itself should the feds decide to
bail on the controversy.

Insite, which opened its doors in 2003, has been allowed to exist
because the federal government has granted it an exemption from the
country's narcotic laws (illegal drugs, notably heroin, are allowed to
be on the premises, thus necessitating the need for an exemption from
prosecution).

But the current exemption expires on June 30. A host of supporters of
Insite have pooled efforts to keep the facility open and goodness
knows they're pushing a big rock up a steep hill when it comes to
dealing with the federal government.

It's clear the whole philosophical and medical underpinning of Insite
- -- which recognizes that drug addiction is primarily a health issue,
not a criminal one -- makes the Harper government very uneasy.

I've written before about the completely ineffective war on drugs that
stresses enforcement and prohibition. Despite that ongoing failure,
ideological conservatives and right-wingers still cling to the notion
that simply catching drug addicts and throwing them in jail solves the
problem.

Their approach is, of course, wrong and there is very little positive
evidence to back up their assertions that they're on the right track.
Still, the Harper gang has left enough clues that they prefer to keep
the ideological blinkers firmly in place.

The fact that Insite's effectiveness has been cited in 20 articles in
leading peer-review publications seems to matter little.

The fact that studies by the Vancouver Coastal Health Authority and
noted criminologist Neil Boyd from Simon Fraser University show
numerous benefits arising from Insite's existence (fewer drug
overdoses, reduced transmission of HIV/Hep C viruses, more public
order in the area, and a 40 per cent treatment rate for drug users)
seem to matter little.

The fact that B.C. Provincial Health Officer Perry Kendall, one of the
world's most credible authorities on harm reduction, is a passionate
advocate of Insite, seems to matter little.

Opponents are left quoting from a single, dubious study that suggests
the experiment has been a failure. But when one looks further, it
turns out the study's author is the research director of the Drug
Prevention Network of Canada, a prohibition group led by former
Conservative MP Randy White.

For the federal government to give greater weight to such a flawed,
questionable report over such esteemed and credible sources as the
Lancet, the New England Journal of Medicine and Dr. Kendall would be a
travesty.

But then again, maybe that would be a good thing. If we can get rid of
ideological, moralistic attitudes shaping our approach to dealing with
drug addiction then maybe we can make some progress on that bleak landscape.

So a word to Ottawa: hand this facility over to the B.C. government. Let it
continue its operations and good work.

Keep your ideological prejudices to yourselves. This province, and
particularly the people who literally need Insite to stay alive, would
be all the better for it.