HOUSE MULLS MEDICINAL MARIJUANA BILL

Some at the Capitol believe that Gov. Pawlenty might veto the bill if
it passes.

Should Minnesota be the first state in the Midwest to legalize
medicinal marijuana?

That's the question Gov. Tim Pawlenty could be asking himself in the
next few weeks.

A bill that would legalize marijuana for Minnesotans with
"debilitating medical conditions" passed in the Senate almost a year
ago and is currently facing the House.

If passed, qualifying Minnesotans 18 years of age and older would be
allowed 12 marijuana plants and 2.5 ounces of usable marijuana at a
time.

With wide bipartisan support, Rep. Chris DeLaForest, R-Andover, said
he's confident the bill will pass the House.

However, DeLaForest recognized Pawlenty might veto the bill and said
he's trying to work with the governor to craft a bill he'd approve.

The Debate

Sen. Steve Murphy, DFL-Red Wing, the author of the bill introduced to
the Senate last year, said legalizing medicinal marijuana in Minnesota
is a personal issue for him.

Murphy described the difficult time his family had when his father had
cancer a few years ago and how it inspired him to pursue the bill.

"You talk to any doctor," he said. "A lot of these chemo patients, if
they're fatigued and they're sick and they're not eating, their
chances of survival go down.

And nobody wants that for anybody. (Medical marijuana) does provide
relief for those who choose to use it." Whether Pawlenty will veto
the bill, Murphy said, is a "coin toss."

"He tends to change his mind midstream sometimes," he said. "The
approval rating of (legalizing medicinal marijuana) is astronomically
high. And I just can't see how the governor says he's representing the
people and yet would veto this bill."

However, some Minnesotans don't think medicinal marijuana is the
answer.

Tom Prichard, president of Minnesota Family Council, said he has
several problems with the bill.

Prichard said he doesn't think the Legislature should be determining
which drugs are deemed safe.

"By them legalizing its use for medical purposes, they're sending the
message that it's a safe and legal substance, when, in fact, the
evidence out there suggests it isn't," he said.

Prichard also criticized the language of the bill, suggesting terms
like "debilitating medical condition" are too ambiguous.

"Is it tennis elbow?" he said. "I would think you could classify that
as a debilitating condition."

The bill states a health commissioner can define debilitating medical
conditions, but cancer, severe chronic pain, seizures and some
conditions of HIV are included in the definition.

Prichard questioned the intent behind the bill, suggesting the people
behind it are trying to further a more widespread legalization of marijuana.

"In my view, it's pretty clear what's involved here," he said. "This
is just an effort to more broadly legalize it."

David Martin, a first-year medical student, also said he doesn't think
the Legislature should determine whether marijuana should be used for
medicinal purposes, but he supports using marijuana as a potential
form of treatment.

"It should be up to proven medical research," he said. "If there is a
benefit to be had from it, it should be available to be used."

Martin said the decision should be made between a doctor and a
patient, and should be handled as it would be with other medical treatment.

"A matter of principle shouldn't really enter into a doctor and a
patient trying to set the best course of therapy for a particular
disease or condition," he said.

If passed, qualified users will be able to use marijuana in their
homes and at least 500 feet away from schools and churches, Murphy
said.

Minnesota would be the 13th state to pass this type of bill.