News (Media Awareness Project) - US AL: PUB LTE: No Drug Testing |
Title: | US AL: PUB LTE: No Drug Testing |
Published On: | 2008-03-04 |
Source: | Gadsden Times, The (AL) |
Fetched On: | 2008-03-07 15:11:45 |
NO DRUG TESTING
In response to "Policy is for Prevention" (Feb. 24, 2008) I submit
the following in hopes of providing parents and educators with good,
scientific-based reasons to "Just say no to student drug testing."
Oregon Health and Science University researchers just concluded a
two-year study called SATURN (Student Athlete Testing Using Random
Notification).
This is the first-ever prospective, randomized clinical trial to
measure the deterrent effects of drug and alcohol testing among high
school athletes. They report random drug and alcohol testing does not
reliably keep student-athletes from using. They also found drug
testing increases some risk factors for future substance use. These
findings are published in the November issue of the Journal of
Adolescent Health, the journal of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.
Student drug testing places kids in greater danger for a variety of
reasons. Marijuana is the substance most commonly used by youth and
is the safest of all substances, both licit and illicit. Students who
might engage in a little youthful indiscretion by smoking pot once in
a while, might move to harder drugs like meth and prescription
narcotics because they are out of your system in 72 hours, whereas
the broken down metabolites of marijuana, while causing no harm, are
detectable in the human body for up to 45 days. Kids are also known
to do crazy things like drink bleach in hopes of masking drugs in
their system. That is extremely dangerous.
Parents and educators should also be aware that the following
organizations oppose randomly drug testing students: National
Education Association, the Association for Addiction Professionals,
the American Public Health Association, the American Academy of
Pediatrics, the National Association of Social Workers, and the
National Council on Alcoholism and Drug Dependence.
If that many professionals say no to student drug testing, studies
show it doesn't work and might even place kids in greater danger then
why do we continue to see schools push for these invasive and
dehumanizing programs for our kids?
Loretta Nall
Alexander City
In response to "Policy is for Prevention" (Feb. 24, 2008) I submit
the following in hopes of providing parents and educators with good,
scientific-based reasons to "Just say no to student drug testing."
Oregon Health and Science University researchers just concluded a
two-year study called SATURN (Student Athlete Testing Using Random
Notification).
This is the first-ever prospective, randomized clinical trial to
measure the deterrent effects of drug and alcohol testing among high
school athletes. They report random drug and alcohol testing does not
reliably keep student-athletes from using. They also found drug
testing increases some risk factors for future substance use. These
findings are published in the November issue of the Journal of
Adolescent Health, the journal of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.
Student drug testing places kids in greater danger for a variety of
reasons. Marijuana is the substance most commonly used by youth and
is the safest of all substances, both licit and illicit. Students who
might engage in a little youthful indiscretion by smoking pot once in
a while, might move to harder drugs like meth and prescription
narcotics because they are out of your system in 72 hours, whereas
the broken down metabolites of marijuana, while causing no harm, are
detectable in the human body for up to 45 days. Kids are also known
to do crazy things like drink bleach in hopes of masking drugs in
their system. That is extremely dangerous.
Parents and educators should also be aware that the following
organizations oppose randomly drug testing students: National
Education Association, the Association for Addiction Professionals,
the American Public Health Association, the American Academy of
Pediatrics, the National Association of Social Workers, and the
National Council on Alcoholism and Drug Dependence.
If that many professionals say no to student drug testing, studies
show it doesn't work and might even place kids in greater danger then
why do we continue to see schools push for these invasive and
dehumanizing programs for our kids?
Loretta Nall
Alexander City
Member Comments |
No member comments available...