News (Media Awareness Project) - US NJ: SMART Group Rallies Against Drug Testing |
Title: | US NJ: SMART Group Rallies Against Drug Testing |
Published On: | 2008-02-28 |
Source: | Examiner, The (NJ) |
Fetched On: | 2008-03-01 14:09:35 |
SMART GROUP RALLIES AGAINST DRUG TESTING
UFRSD Seeks To Randomly Screen Kids In Clubs, Athletics
Upper Freehold Regional School District students are organizing in
protest of possible randomdrug testing for pupils involved in
extracurricular activities.
A group of students and parents voiced their dissent at theUpper
Freehold Regional Board of Education meeting on Feb. 20. The board is
currently in the process of reviewing a random drug testing policy
that the school district's Random Drug Testing Committee wants to
have implemented.
The school district already has a policy in place for the evaluation
and treatment of pupils under the influence of substances.According
to the student handbook, any staff member who suspects a pupil may be
under the influence on school property or at a school function has to
report the matter to the school nurse or an administrator. The
student's parents are notified and the principal arranges for an
immediate medical examination of the pupil.
If it is determined that a pupil has been using, a Substance
Awareness Coordinator determines the need for treatment and parental
outreach is conducted.
Students found using may fall subject to further scheduled or random
drug tests and various penalties. For the first offense, a student
gets two days of out-of-school suspension (OSS) and five days of
in-school suspension (ISS), suspension from extracurricular
activities, parking and other grade-related privileges for 45 days.
For a second offense, a student gets five days of OSS and two days of
ISS and continues to have suspended privileges. For the third
offense, a student gets 10 days OSS and a mandatory Board ofEducation
hearing aswell as the additional penalties.
New Jersey students in grades nine through 12 who participate in
athletics and other extracurricular activities or who park their cars
at school became subject to random drug testing in schools across the
state when then-actingGov.Richard Codey signed bill S- 500 into law
onAug. 29, 2005.
Following the lead of federal and state courts, the Legislature
decided itmay be appropriate for school districts to combat drug
issues through the random drug testing of students participating in
extracurricular activities, including interscholastic athletics, and
studentswho possess school parking permits. Under the law, local
school boardswere made responsible for holding public hearings before
adopting new drug testing policies.
If the Upper Freehold Regional Board of Education decides to adopt
the policy proposed by its Random Drug Testing Committee, 85 percent
of the student body would become eligible for the tests. According
toAllentownHigh School Principal Chris Nagy, the district would hire
an outside organization to randomly select students to test. He said
only 10 percent of the 85 percent eligible would actually be tested
each year for a total of 80 tests per year. He said each test would cost $27.
Board of Education President Joseph Stampe said the boardwould
reviewthe proposed policy, which the committee derived from
researching other school districts with such policies including
Hunterdon Central, Middletown and BrickMemorial.
As proposed, the policy would allow parents to have their children
opt out of the testing, but those who refuse the tests would not be
permitted to participate in extracurricular activities. The policy
would require students who test positive to attend sessions with the
school's student assistant counselor (SAC) and preventative
educational programs. Students who test positive could lose the
privileges of participating in extracurricular activities, parking on
campus, going to prom and walking in graduation.
Stampe said the board is committed to providing a safe environment
for all students and to preventing drug, alcohol and steroid use. He
said he has reviewed statistics that showrandomdrug policies
dramatically cut drug use in the student populations.
Many students are against the proposed policy and have formed a
Facebook group called Students Morally Against Random Testing
(SMART). The group currently has 200 members.
In four days, SMART collected 387 signatures of students against the
randomtesting and presented them to the board.
"We will continue to add to that list and plan on resubmitting the
petition at the next Board of Education meeting, providing copies for
all members of the board and the administration as well," Brendan
Benedict, an Allentown High School senior and former president of the
Life Savers Club, said.
Benedict said students from every grade are involved in the process.
"Asmore information becomes available, I think more of the student
body will join in the opposition as the policywill effect the 900
students involved in extracurricular activities," he said.
Although there are flawed logistical and monetary aspects of the
policy, Benedict said personal privacy is the central issue.
"Random drug testing is a gateway drug to students having less
freedom," he said. "Students on medication would have to disclose
that information to clear their names after a positive test. That is
certainly a step too far andmight fall in conflict with the nation's
HIPAAstandards."
Benedict said there are many ways in which the school can curb the
use of drugs and alcohol other than by conducting random drug testing.
"The social aspect of recreational drug and alcohol use is a large
component of the problem," he said. "The school should add more
social activities on Friday and Saturday nights, to provide for a
safe and fun environment away from substance use."
He said the high school currently holds three dances a year and
should holdmore, as well as other events.
Benedict said stress is another component in a student's desire to
use drugs or alcohol.
"By providing some sort of therapy for overburdened kids, the school
would be taking a proactive step in drug prevention," he said. He
also said the school district should consider hiring an additional
Student Assistance Counselor and opening the Life Savers Club to all
members of the student body instead of just to students who pledge to
be drug free.
"Communication is also key," he said. "Most students are unaware of
programs offered by the StudentAssistance Counselor."
Benedict said that even though it seemed like boardmembers and
administrators have already made up theirminds about the issue, the
community response remains strong.
"Several board members requested additional information and thanked
us for attending," he said. "I am adamant inmy belief that with a
strong community coalition this policy will not be enacted, and,
failing that, non-supportingmembers of the Board of Educationwill not
be reelected."
He said a large portion of the senior class is eligible to vote in
April's Board of Education elections and would certainly respond if
the measure passes.
Students against the proposed random drug testing policy can take a
stand by signing the petition, becoming an activemember of the SMART
online community, attending Board ofEducationmeetings andwriting
letters to board members.
"As the vote on the policy approaches,we will intensify and vary in
our protesting methods," Benedict said. "We have also received the
backing of the national organization Students for Sensible Drug
Policy and are in the process of getting assistance from theAmerican
Civil Liberties Union."
The New Jersey Supreme Court, in a 4-3 decision on Sept. 9, 2003,
upheld Hunterdon CentralHigh School's randomdrug policy for students
in extracurricular activities and those who park on campus.
The American Civil LibertiesUnion had challenged this policy, on
behalf of parents and students, as a violation of privacy and the
protection against unreasonable searches and seizures in the
NewJerseyConstitution. The State Supreme Court held that the school
met the "special needs" exception to the search and seizure warrant
requirement because of the need for schools to provide safe
environments, the diminished expectation of privacy of students
(especially when in extra-curricular activities) and the showing by
this school that a significant portion of the student body had used
drugs or alcohol. The New Jersey Supreme Court, therefore, stated
that a policy of random testing for all students, rather than
limiting it to students involved in extracurricular activities, would
eliminate the ability of a conscientious objector to opt out of the
eligible pool and would jeopardize the program's constitutionality.
The court also stated that its decision is "not to be viewed as a
green light for schools wishing to replicateHunterdonCentral's
program." Each drug and alcohol testing programwould be analyzed
separately, and each school would have to "base their intended
programs on a meticulously established record."
Therewere eight incidents involving substance abuse during 2006-2007
according to the annual substance abuse, violence and vandalism
report for Upper Freehold Regional SchoolDistrict.When compared to
the report for the 2005-06 school year, the number of substance abuse
incidents in 2006-07 had decreased by 11. In 2005-06 there were 19
incidents of reported substance abuse at the high school and none
reported at the lower grade levels.
Of the substance-abuse incidents in 2006- 07, five involved suspected
marijuana use that was confirmed and two involved suspectedmarijuana
and cocaine abuse thatwas confirmed. There was also an incident in
which just cocaine use was suspected and confirmed, as well as two
incidents where students were found in possession of illegal drugs
for which the police were notified. The report also states that 22
students had been sent for drug screenings in 2005-06, 10 of who
tested positive. The previous year's report stated that seven
students had been screened and four tested positive. Prior to that,
in 2004-05, 37 students had been sent for a drug screening and eight
tested positive.
Louise San Nicola, the school district's public information officer,
thisweek said that it is imperative for parents to understand that
the board is unified in its interest to have randomdrug testing in an
effort to keep students safe and drug free.
"They understand the importance of giving the students an opportunity
tomake good choices," she said.
She said random drug testing has been shown to be extremely effective
at reducing drug use in schools and businesses all over the country.
Fitzpatrick said that the appearance of concerned students at the
last boardmeeting "tells us that our young people are committed to
the rights of all people."
He said, "If students are looking to coordinate a change in our
perspective, they shouldmake suggestions to the board.We are trying
to do this in a cooperativeway because this came from students at the
high school who wanted us to consider this as an option."
Fitzpatrick said the board will likely make a decision about the
proposed policy in March and that the board has created a timeline
that includes listening to and receiving input fromparents and
communitymembers prior to reaching a decision.
The board's next workshop meeting will take place at 7:15 p.m. in the
board office on March 5.
UFRSD Seeks To Randomly Screen Kids In Clubs, Athletics
Upper Freehold Regional School District students are organizing in
protest of possible randomdrug testing for pupils involved in
extracurricular activities.
A group of students and parents voiced their dissent at theUpper
Freehold Regional Board of Education meeting on Feb. 20. The board is
currently in the process of reviewing a random drug testing policy
that the school district's Random Drug Testing Committee wants to
have implemented.
The school district already has a policy in place for the evaluation
and treatment of pupils under the influence of substances.According
to the student handbook, any staff member who suspects a pupil may be
under the influence on school property or at a school function has to
report the matter to the school nurse or an administrator. The
student's parents are notified and the principal arranges for an
immediate medical examination of the pupil.
If it is determined that a pupil has been using, a Substance
Awareness Coordinator determines the need for treatment and parental
outreach is conducted.
Students found using may fall subject to further scheduled or random
drug tests and various penalties. For the first offense, a student
gets two days of out-of-school suspension (OSS) and five days of
in-school suspension (ISS), suspension from extracurricular
activities, parking and other grade-related privileges for 45 days.
For a second offense, a student gets five days of OSS and two days of
ISS and continues to have suspended privileges. For the third
offense, a student gets 10 days OSS and a mandatory Board ofEducation
hearing aswell as the additional penalties.
New Jersey students in grades nine through 12 who participate in
athletics and other extracurricular activities or who park their cars
at school became subject to random drug testing in schools across the
state when then-actingGov.Richard Codey signed bill S- 500 into law
onAug. 29, 2005.
Following the lead of federal and state courts, the Legislature
decided itmay be appropriate for school districts to combat drug
issues through the random drug testing of students participating in
extracurricular activities, including interscholastic athletics, and
studentswho possess school parking permits. Under the law, local
school boardswere made responsible for holding public hearings before
adopting new drug testing policies.
If the Upper Freehold Regional Board of Education decides to adopt
the policy proposed by its Random Drug Testing Committee, 85 percent
of the student body would become eligible for the tests. According
toAllentownHigh School Principal Chris Nagy, the district would hire
an outside organization to randomly select students to test. He said
only 10 percent of the 85 percent eligible would actually be tested
each year for a total of 80 tests per year. He said each test would cost $27.
Board of Education President Joseph Stampe said the boardwould
reviewthe proposed policy, which the committee derived from
researching other school districts with such policies including
Hunterdon Central, Middletown and BrickMemorial.
As proposed, the policy would allow parents to have their children
opt out of the testing, but those who refuse the tests would not be
permitted to participate in extracurricular activities. The policy
would require students who test positive to attend sessions with the
school's student assistant counselor (SAC) and preventative
educational programs. Students who test positive could lose the
privileges of participating in extracurricular activities, parking on
campus, going to prom and walking in graduation.
Stampe said the board is committed to providing a safe environment
for all students and to preventing drug, alcohol and steroid use. He
said he has reviewed statistics that showrandomdrug policies
dramatically cut drug use in the student populations.
Many students are against the proposed policy and have formed a
Facebook group called Students Morally Against Random Testing
(SMART). The group currently has 200 members.
In four days, SMART collected 387 signatures of students against the
randomtesting and presented them to the board.
"We will continue to add to that list and plan on resubmitting the
petition at the next Board of Education meeting, providing copies for
all members of the board and the administration as well," Brendan
Benedict, an Allentown High School senior and former president of the
Life Savers Club, said.
Benedict said students from every grade are involved in the process.
"Asmore information becomes available, I think more of the student
body will join in the opposition as the policywill effect the 900
students involved in extracurricular activities," he said.
Although there are flawed logistical and monetary aspects of the
policy, Benedict said personal privacy is the central issue.
"Random drug testing is a gateway drug to students having less
freedom," he said. "Students on medication would have to disclose
that information to clear their names after a positive test. That is
certainly a step too far andmight fall in conflict with the nation's
HIPAAstandards."
Benedict said there are many ways in which the school can curb the
use of drugs and alcohol other than by conducting random drug testing.
"The social aspect of recreational drug and alcohol use is a large
component of the problem," he said. "The school should add more
social activities on Friday and Saturday nights, to provide for a
safe and fun environment away from substance use."
He said the high school currently holds three dances a year and
should holdmore, as well as other events.
Benedict said stress is another component in a student's desire to
use drugs or alcohol.
"By providing some sort of therapy for overburdened kids, the school
would be taking a proactive step in drug prevention," he said. He
also said the school district should consider hiring an additional
Student Assistance Counselor and opening the Life Savers Club to all
members of the student body instead of just to students who pledge to
be drug free.
"Communication is also key," he said. "Most students are unaware of
programs offered by the StudentAssistance Counselor."
Benedict said that even though it seemed like boardmembers and
administrators have already made up theirminds about the issue, the
community response remains strong.
"Several board members requested additional information and thanked
us for attending," he said. "I am adamant inmy belief that with a
strong community coalition this policy will not be enacted, and,
failing that, non-supportingmembers of the Board of Educationwill not
be reelected."
He said a large portion of the senior class is eligible to vote in
April's Board of Education elections and would certainly respond if
the measure passes.
Students against the proposed random drug testing policy can take a
stand by signing the petition, becoming an activemember of the SMART
online community, attending Board ofEducationmeetings andwriting
letters to board members.
"As the vote on the policy approaches,we will intensify and vary in
our protesting methods," Benedict said. "We have also received the
backing of the national organization Students for Sensible Drug
Policy and are in the process of getting assistance from theAmerican
Civil Liberties Union."
The New Jersey Supreme Court, in a 4-3 decision on Sept. 9, 2003,
upheld Hunterdon CentralHigh School's randomdrug policy for students
in extracurricular activities and those who park on campus.
The American Civil LibertiesUnion had challenged this policy, on
behalf of parents and students, as a violation of privacy and the
protection against unreasonable searches and seizures in the
NewJerseyConstitution. The State Supreme Court held that the school
met the "special needs" exception to the search and seizure warrant
requirement because of the need for schools to provide safe
environments, the diminished expectation of privacy of students
(especially when in extra-curricular activities) and the showing by
this school that a significant portion of the student body had used
drugs or alcohol. The New Jersey Supreme Court, therefore, stated
that a policy of random testing for all students, rather than
limiting it to students involved in extracurricular activities, would
eliminate the ability of a conscientious objector to opt out of the
eligible pool and would jeopardize the program's constitutionality.
The court also stated that its decision is "not to be viewed as a
green light for schools wishing to replicateHunterdonCentral's
program." Each drug and alcohol testing programwould be analyzed
separately, and each school would have to "base their intended
programs on a meticulously established record."
Therewere eight incidents involving substance abuse during 2006-2007
according to the annual substance abuse, violence and vandalism
report for Upper Freehold Regional SchoolDistrict.When compared to
the report for the 2005-06 school year, the number of substance abuse
incidents in 2006-07 had decreased by 11. In 2005-06 there were 19
incidents of reported substance abuse at the high school and none
reported at the lower grade levels.
Of the substance-abuse incidents in 2006- 07, five involved suspected
marijuana use that was confirmed and two involved suspectedmarijuana
and cocaine abuse thatwas confirmed. There was also an incident in
which just cocaine use was suspected and confirmed, as well as two
incidents where students were found in possession of illegal drugs
for which the police were notified. The report also states that 22
students had been sent for drug screenings in 2005-06, 10 of who
tested positive. The previous year's report stated that seven
students had been screened and four tested positive. Prior to that,
in 2004-05, 37 students had been sent for a drug screening and eight
tested positive.
Louise San Nicola, the school district's public information officer,
thisweek said that it is imperative for parents to understand that
the board is unified in its interest to have randomdrug testing in an
effort to keep students safe and drug free.
"They understand the importance of giving the students an opportunity
tomake good choices," she said.
She said random drug testing has been shown to be extremely effective
at reducing drug use in schools and businesses all over the country.
Fitzpatrick said that the appearance of concerned students at the
last boardmeeting "tells us that our young people are committed to
the rights of all people."
He said, "If students are looking to coordinate a change in our
perspective, they shouldmake suggestions to the board.We are trying
to do this in a cooperativeway because this came from students at the
high school who wanted us to consider this as an option."
Fitzpatrick said the board will likely make a decision about the
proposed policy in March and that the board has created a timeline
that includes listening to and receiving input fromparents and
communitymembers prior to reaching a decision.
The board's next workshop meeting will take place at 7:15 p.m. in the
board office on March 5.
Member Comments |
No member comments available...