News (Media Awareness Project) - US CA: Editorial: That Other Muddled War |
Title: | US CA: Editorial: That Other Muddled War |
Published On: | 2007-02-02 |
Source: | Ledger Dispatch (Jackson, CA) |
Fetched On: | 2008-01-12 16:24:05 |
THAT OTHER MUDDLED WAR
I remember Nancy Reagan shaking hands with Gary Coleman on a very
special episode of "Diff'rent Strokes." I remember watching eggs fry
in a hot skillet and growing hungry for my brain on drugs. I remember
sitting in a darkened theater with about 15 other filmgoers and being
unable to move because the horrifying drug opus "Requiem for a Dream"
had reduced us to quivering masses. I remember that commercial with
the two guys sitting at a bar, talking about how smoking marijuana
helped the terrorists.
I remember just saying no to that last one.
When it comes to the war on drugs, I consider myself a conscientious
objector. And it's not because I foster romantic notions regarding
experimentation and individual freedom, but because this intractable
conflict has trudged on too selectively.
If you want to know what the difference is between crack and powder
cocaine, it's these three things: Price, race and jail time.
And more than a decade after Californians passed the landmark
Compassionate Use Act of 1996, the federal and state governments
continue to stare at each other across the medicinal marijuana legal
divide. Stuck in the middle are the chronically and terminally ill,
who can't freely access pain medication that would quell their agony.
But hey, if they want to go down to the corner pharmacy for something
a lot less effective yet far more addictive, current drug laws say no problem.
While counties like Amador do allow qualified medical patients to
procure voluntary medical marijuana identification cards with a
doctor's recommendation, these same communities don't permit the
cannabis dispensaries that could actually fill the prescriptions. You
can find them in metropolitan areas, but many suburban and rural
communities have placed moratoriums on medical marijuana dispensaries
for fear that the federal government will knock them down.
It's a credible fear.
Drug enforcement agents jack-booted their way into several
dispensaries last year, including ones in Sacramento, San Francisco,
San Diego, Los Angeles and elsewhere. And while most dispensaries go
about their business without federally sanctioned harassment, the
raids that have occurred have been high profile enough to scare the
timid. In the eyes of U.S. law, Hippie Hank and Chemo Carl are the same.
And yet, a recent government-funded survey found that illicit drug
use among teens is actually on the decline, compared to a rising
number of American youth who are beginning to abuse legal, prescription drugs.
So where's the drug protection that we actually need?
Allergies, nausea, muscle aches, impotence, depression, short
attention spans, hair loss, chunky thighs - is there any ailment
there isn't a drug for?
And here's a question for all the adults: Whatever happened to
sucking it up? Is life in the 21st century that unbearable, or are we
ODing on a custom-fit society, where every petty grievance has a
magic elixir and every wayward blister has a reconstructive surgeon
and anesthesiologist standing by.
That's a rhetorical question. The answer is 'yes.'
But if the adults are acting like big babies, then the federal
government is thriving in the role of enabler. The Federal Drug
Administration will greenlight Oxycontin, now a popular street drug
because of its ability to knock fiends on their duffs, but hold up
even discussing RU-486 until the nomination of its new director is
held up by the Senate.
A $26 million fine against ineffective diet pills notwithstanding,
the FDA has proven itself less as a competent oversight body and more
as the gatekeeper of massive political contributions from the
pharmaceutical industry.
As a result, the message given to America's youth is decidedly mixed.
Kids may be young, but they're not stupid. They can smell the
hypocrisy like it's oregano baking in a hot baggy.
After 88 years of this decomposing drug war - longer if you count
Maine's passage of its prohibition law in 1846 - we still can't pick
our battles. Heck, we can't even keep steroids out of major league sports.
And just like that other disastrous conflict thousands of miles away,
our war on drugs shows no signs of abating.
I remember Nancy Reagan shaking hands with Gary Coleman on a very
special episode of "Diff'rent Strokes." I remember watching eggs fry
in a hot skillet and growing hungry for my brain on drugs. I remember
sitting in a darkened theater with about 15 other filmgoers and being
unable to move because the horrifying drug opus "Requiem for a Dream"
had reduced us to quivering masses. I remember that commercial with
the two guys sitting at a bar, talking about how smoking marijuana
helped the terrorists.
I remember just saying no to that last one.
When it comes to the war on drugs, I consider myself a conscientious
objector. And it's not because I foster romantic notions regarding
experimentation and individual freedom, but because this intractable
conflict has trudged on too selectively.
If you want to know what the difference is between crack and powder
cocaine, it's these three things: Price, race and jail time.
And more than a decade after Californians passed the landmark
Compassionate Use Act of 1996, the federal and state governments
continue to stare at each other across the medicinal marijuana legal
divide. Stuck in the middle are the chronically and terminally ill,
who can't freely access pain medication that would quell their agony.
But hey, if they want to go down to the corner pharmacy for something
a lot less effective yet far more addictive, current drug laws say no problem.
While counties like Amador do allow qualified medical patients to
procure voluntary medical marijuana identification cards with a
doctor's recommendation, these same communities don't permit the
cannabis dispensaries that could actually fill the prescriptions. You
can find them in metropolitan areas, but many suburban and rural
communities have placed moratoriums on medical marijuana dispensaries
for fear that the federal government will knock them down.
It's a credible fear.
Drug enforcement agents jack-booted their way into several
dispensaries last year, including ones in Sacramento, San Francisco,
San Diego, Los Angeles and elsewhere. And while most dispensaries go
about their business without federally sanctioned harassment, the
raids that have occurred have been high profile enough to scare the
timid. In the eyes of U.S. law, Hippie Hank and Chemo Carl are the same.
And yet, a recent government-funded survey found that illicit drug
use among teens is actually on the decline, compared to a rising
number of American youth who are beginning to abuse legal, prescription drugs.
So where's the drug protection that we actually need?
Allergies, nausea, muscle aches, impotence, depression, short
attention spans, hair loss, chunky thighs - is there any ailment
there isn't a drug for?
And here's a question for all the adults: Whatever happened to
sucking it up? Is life in the 21st century that unbearable, or are we
ODing on a custom-fit society, where every petty grievance has a
magic elixir and every wayward blister has a reconstructive surgeon
and anesthesiologist standing by.
That's a rhetorical question. The answer is 'yes.'
But if the adults are acting like big babies, then the federal
government is thriving in the role of enabler. The Federal Drug
Administration will greenlight Oxycontin, now a popular street drug
because of its ability to knock fiends on their duffs, but hold up
even discussing RU-486 until the nomination of its new director is
held up by the Senate.
A $26 million fine against ineffective diet pills notwithstanding,
the FDA has proven itself less as a competent oversight body and more
as the gatekeeper of massive political contributions from the
pharmaceutical industry.
As a result, the message given to America's youth is decidedly mixed.
Kids may be young, but they're not stupid. They can smell the
hypocrisy like it's oregano baking in a hot baggy.
After 88 years of this decomposing drug war - longer if you count
Maine's passage of its prohibition law in 1846 - we still can't pick
our battles. Heck, we can't even keep steroids out of major league sports.
And just like that other disastrous conflict thousands of miles away,
our war on drugs shows no signs of abating.
Member Comments |
No member comments available...