Rave Radio: Offline (0/0)
Email: Password:
News (Media Awareness Project) - US: Judge Tells DEA To Issue License To Grow Pot For Research
Title:US: Judge Tells DEA To Issue License To Grow Pot For Research
Published On:2007-02-15
Source:Bay Area Reporter (San Francisco, CA)
Fetched On:2008-01-12 15:27:07
JUDGE TELLS DEA TO ISSUE LICENSE TO GROW POT FOR RESEARCH

An administrative law judge has ruled that the Drug Enforcement
Administration should issue a license to a Massachusetts plant
biologist to allow him to cultivate marijuana for medical research
purposes. All such materials currently are produced at a facility at
the University of Mississippi under contract with the National
Institute on Drug Abuse.

Judge Marry Ellen Bittner concluded that granting the license is
allowed under international law; "there would be a minimal risk of
diversion of marijuana;" the current supply of marijuana for research
purposes is inadequate; and that issuing the license "would be in the
public interest."

The exhaustive hearings were conducted over multiple days in August
and December 2005. The 87-page decision, which offers an excellent
primer on how the federal government regulates marijuana research,
was released February 12.

The DEA has 20 days in which to either accept the decision and issue
the license or appeal the decision to the director of the agency.

Lyle E. Craker, Ph.D., filed the lawsuit seeking to grow the
marijuana. "I've worked with medicinal and aromatic plants for the
past 20 years. I view medical cannabis as the same as any other
botanical plant with potential health benefits," he said.

"We need to separate the anecdotal from the tested ... If we don't do
this, society is going to lose, patients will continue to suffer," he added.

Barbara Roberts, Ph.D., is a former head of the Office of National
Drug Control Policy and a current board member of the pro-marijuana
group Americans for Safe Access. She called publication of the study
demonstrating the effectiveness of cannabis in treating peripheral
neuropathy, and Bittner's decision, a double blow to those who would
prohibit such research.

"The government wants to have it both ways, they say the [Abrams]
study doesn't have scientific rigor, so therefore there is no point
in going forward. And, by the way, we are not allowing the science to
go forward either," she said.

Roberts said this is "a wake up call for Congress to hold hearings"
on the 1999 Institute of Medicine report that supported research into
the medicinal potential of marijuana. While the organization hopes
for such hearings, it has yet to identify a member of Congress who
will lead that activity.
Member Comments
No member comments available...