News (Media Awareness Project) - Australia: PUB LTE: A Legal Stats Field |
Title: | Australia: PUB LTE: A Legal Stats Field |
Published On: | 2001-04-23 |
Source: | Sydney Morning Herald (Australia) |
Fetched On: | 2008-01-26 17:44:54 |
A LEGAL STATS FIELD
Jay Bacik claims that the 1998 National Drug Strategy Household Survey
"shows less than 30 per cent of Australians aged 14 and over support the
legalisation of marijuana for personal use, and less than 10 per cent
support the legalisation of heroin, cocaine and other amphetamines"
(Letters, April 20).
These survey results are disturbingly different from other surverys
conducted over the 1990s that indicate support for marijuana legalisation
never less than 50 per cent and up to 75 per cent.
Sir Humphrey Appleby would be able to explain these discrepancies. Survey
results invariably favour the group who sponsored them, and statistics
always favour the person interpreting them.
I wonder how many of the respondents were really in the 14- to 25-year age
group and how many were in the 50-plus age group. Am I really supposed to
believe that a statistically significant group of 14-year-olds responded to
a national survey?
Of course, it is customary when you have no argument to resort to surveys
and statistics.
Andrew Lewis, South Coogee, April 20.
Jay Bacik claims that the 1998 National Drug Strategy Household Survey
"shows less than 30 per cent of Australians aged 14 and over support the
legalisation of marijuana for personal use, and less than 10 per cent
support the legalisation of heroin, cocaine and other amphetamines"
(Letters, April 20).
These survey results are disturbingly different from other surverys
conducted over the 1990s that indicate support for marijuana legalisation
never less than 50 per cent and up to 75 per cent.
Sir Humphrey Appleby would be able to explain these discrepancies. Survey
results invariably favour the group who sponsored them, and statistics
always favour the person interpreting them.
I wonder how many of the respondents were really in the 14- to 25-year age
group and how many were in the 50-plus age group. Am I really supposed to
believe that a statistically significant group of 14-year-olds responded to
a national survey?
Of course, it is customary when you have no argument to resort to surveys
and statistics.
Andrew Lewis, South Coogee, April 20.
Member Comments |
No member comments available...