News (Media Awareness Project) - US OR: OPED: Marijuana More Than Medicinal |
Title: | US OR: OPED: Marijuana More Than Medicinal |
Published On: | 2007-02-16 |
Source: | Register-Guard, The (OR) |
Fetched On: | 2008-01-12 12:53:21 |
MARIJUANA MORE THAN MEDICINAL
As a registered cannabis-using patient in Oregon, I enjoy the benefit
of one of the best medical marijuana programs in the country. If I
actually could get access to my medicine in a safe, consistent manner
- - at a local dispensary, for instance - it would be perfect.
I am confined to a wheelchair by an especially crippling form of
rheumatoid arthritis and suffer from the associated chronic pain
issues. I also have glaucoma and other eye conditions, severe muscle
spasms and adult-onset insomnia. Growing my own isn't an option for
me. Using cannabis has helped me in many, many ways, but best is its
reduction in my menu of costly pharmaceuticals.
I have seen news reports of Lane County officials' efforts to solve
county government's budget shortfalls. I've seen officials speak of
the need for additional funding, especially for emergency services. I
have an idea that is neither radical or unworkable.
According to Jeffrey Mirons, visiting professor of economics at
Harvard University, in his report "The Budgetary Implications of
Marijuana Prohibition," Oregon has more than 300,000 users of
cannabis. Mirons estimates that the revenue for Oregon from the
legalization of cannabis would be $14 million. Many educated
Oregonians feel it would be nearly twice that.
Unfortunately, there are federal roadblocks to legalization. Oregon
has nearly 15,000 medical patients registered in the Oregon Medical
Marijuana Program who use the drug to treat their various
debilitating ailments. Every one of my fellow cannabis consuming
patients is a case study of cannabis and its medical effects. Yet the
federal government continues to insist that marijuana has no medical use.
Meanwhile, in the real world, the list of medical conditions for
which cannabis is or may be useful continues to grow. Along with the
anti-inflammatory and pain relief properties I enjoy, recent research
indicates that it may help prevent the onset of Alzheimer's and may
be an effective tool in the rehabilitation of people who have
problems with certain hard drugs.
Of course, there are many other conditions that are helped by
cannabis. A friend of mine who has cancer said this about her use:
"Before the Oregon Medical Marijuana Program, I took 25 to 30 pills
each day. I went to the emergency room three to nine times each year.
I saw my doctor every month, plus teams of specialists throughout the
year: nuclear medicine, endocrinology, surgical oncology and others.
"After OMMP I take two pills daily, haven't been to the emergency
room in six years and see my doctor once or twice a year."
Why does Oregon - a state with a moderate, populist, "leave us alone"
stance on federal-state issues - continue to weather abuse by the
feds on the issue of medical marijuana? While patients now receive
protection under the OMMP, we still have thousands of others, users
of a plant that Drug Enforcement Agency administrative law judge
Francis Young called "one of the safest therapeutic substances known
to man" who live under the threat of arrest and prosecution.
According to Western law enforcement officials, as noted in our
attorney general's recent report on organized crime in Oregon:
"Large-scale outdoor marijuana grow operations have also been
discovered in the state, and a number have been found on public
forest lands. These operations, controlled by Mexican drug
trafficking organizations, have been steadily increasing in size and
numbers and now produce tens of thousands of plants each year."
Why should we allow foreign drug syndicates to gain a foothold in
Oregon? Why not accept cannabis use? Why not stand up to the
wrong-headed stance of the federal government?
Legalization also would allow us to grow hemp, possibly allowing us
to take some stress off of our forests and use a plant that former
Cottage Grove and Harrisburg lumberman Bill Conde proved was a better
product for industrial composite materials than our fir and hemlock trees.
The benefits to the state and to local governments of legalization
might go a long way toward reducing state and local budget
shortfalls. I strongly encourage our elected leaders to give some
thought and consideration to this idea.
Cannabis is my medicine by choice, because it allows me a certain
life with dignity. But it is much, much more. A financial savior, perhaps?
As a registered cannabis-using patient in Oregon, I enjoy the benefit
of one of the best medical marijuana programs in the country. If I
actually could get access to my medicine in a safe, consistent manner
- - at a local dispensary, for instance - it would be perfect.
I am confined to a wheelchair by an especially crippling form of
rheumatoid arthritis and suffer from the associated chronic pain
issues. I also have glaucoma and other eye conditions, severe muscle
spasms and adult-onset insomnia. Growing my own isn't an option for
me. Using cannabis has helped me in many, many ways, but best is its
reduction in my menu of costly pharmaceuticals.
I have seen news reports of Lane County officials' efforts to solve
county government's budget shortfalls. I've seen officials speak of
the need for additional funding, especially for emergency services. I
have an idea that is neither radical or unworkable.
According to Jeffrey Mirons, visiting professor of economics at
Harvard University, in his report "The Budgetary Implications of
Marijuana Prohibition," Oregon has more than 300,000 users of
cannabis. Mirons estimates that the revenue for Oregon from the
legalization of cannabis would be $14 million. Many educated
Oregonians feel it would be nearly twice that.
Unfortunately, there are federal roadblocks to legalization. Oregon
has nearly 15,000 medical patients registered in the Oregon Medical
Marijuana Program who use the drug to treat their various
debilitating ailments. Every one of my fellow cannabis consuming
patients is a case study of cannabis and its medical effects. Yet the
federal government continues to insist that marijuana has no medical use.
Meanwhile, in the real world, the list of medical conditions for
which cannabis is or may be useful continues to grow. Along with the
anti-inflammatory and pain relief properties I enjoy, recent research
indicates that it may help prevent the onset of Alzheimer's and may
be an effective tool in the rehabilitation of people who have
problems with certain hard drugs.
Of course, there are many other conditions that are helped by
cannabis. A friend of mine who has cancer said this about her use:
"Before the Oregon Medical Marijuana Program, I took 25 to 30 pills
each day. I went to the emergency room three to nine times each year.
I saw my doctor every month, plus teams of specialists throughout the
year: nuclear medicine, endocrinology, surgical oncology and others.
"After OMMP I take two pills daily, haven't been to the emergency
room in six years and see my doctor once or twice a year."
Why does Oregon - a state with a moderate, populist, "leave us alone"
stance on federal-state issues - continue to weather abuse by the
feds on the issue of medical marijuana? While patients now receive
protection under the OMMP, we still have thousands of others, users
of a plant that Drug Enforcement Agency administrative law judge
Francis Young called "one of the safest therapeutic substances known
to man" who live under the threat of arrest and prosecution.
According to Western law enforcement officials, as noted in our
attorney general's recent report on organized crime in Oregon:
"Large-scale outdoor marijuana grow operations have also been
discovered in the state, and a number have been found on public
forest lands. These operations, controlled by Mexican drug
trafficking organizations, have been steadily increasing in size and
numbers and now produce tens of thousands of plants each year."
Why should we allow foreign drug syndicates to gain a foothold in
Oregon? Why not accept cannabis use? Why not stand up to the
wrong-headed stance of the federal government?
Legalization also would allow us to grow hemp, possibly allowing us
to take some stress off of our forests and use a plant that former
Cottage Grove and Harrisburg lumberman Bill Conde proved was a better
product for industrial composite materials than our fir and hemlock trees.
The benefits to the state and to local governments of legalization
might go a long way toward reducing state and local budget
shortfalls. I strongly encourage our elected leaders to give some
thought and consideration to this idea.
Cannabis is my medicine by choice, because it allows me a certain
life with dignity. But it is much, much more. A financial savior, perhaps?
Member Comments |
No member comments available...