News (Media Awareness Project) - US SC: S.C. High Court Will Revisit Fetal Drug Death Law |
Title: | US SC: S.C. High Court Will Revisit Fetal Drug Death Law |
Published On: | 2001-06-17 |
Source: | Sun News (SC) |
Fetched On: | 2008-01-25 16:42:19 |
S.C. HIGH COURT WILL REVISIT FETAL DRUG DEATH LAW
GREENWOOD - Brenda Peppers had already lost her daughter, born dead. In a
coma after her labor, a crack-addicted Peppers struggled to live; doctors
had to revive her four times in six weeks.
Peppers has not smoked crack since her recovery. But nearly two years
later, prosecutors charged her with abusing her unborn child by taking
cocaine while pregnant.
Peppers accepted a plea agreement at the time because she would only get
two years' probation and could avoid the media attention of a trial. Now
the 35-year-old Greenwood County woman is fighting the law she was
convicted under because she thinks her battle can help other women.
Peppers' lawyer, C. Rauch Wise, will go before the state Supreme Court on
Wednesday to ask justices to overturn their earlier decision that allowed
prosecutors to charge women who take cocaine when their fetuses can live
outside the womb.
Last month, an Horry County woman, Regina McKnight, became the first woman
in the country to be convicted of killing her unborn baby through
crack-cocaine use.
In his argument to the state Supreme Court, Wise plans to point out no
other state has followed South Carolina's lead.
The Attorney General's Office will argue the same reasoning still applies
from the court's 1997 decision.
The ruling said a viable fetus is considered a child and mothers could be
charged with abuse if they took drugs once their unborn child could live
outside the womb.
Punishing pregnant women for illegal drug use has been a sticky issue in
South Carolina for more than a decade. In March 2000, the U.S. Supreme
Court ruled hospitals cannot test pregnant women for drugs without the
women's consent then turn the results over to police.
"The South Carolina Supreme Court stands alone among the 50 states in
permitting the prosecution, conviction and punishment for child
endangerment of pregnant drug users for ingesting substances on which they
are dependent," San Francisco lawyer Daniel Abrahamson wrote in a friend of
the court brief on behalf of seven national and state medical associations.
Supporters, including Attorney General Charlie Condon, say the law is part
of South Carolina's efforts to protect unborn children.
Horry County's chief prosecutor said he tried McKnight on homicide by child
abuse charges because she should have known better than to take drugs while
pregnant.
"Why should a viable fetus, able to live outside the womb, be treated any
different than a month-old infant?" prosecutor Greg Hembree asked.
Wyndi Anderson, the executive director of S.C. Advocates for Pregnant
Women, said, "People across the country can't believe South Carolina can do
this without providing a better network of drug treatment."
GREENWOOD - Brenda Peppers had already lost her daughter, born dead. In a
coma after her labor, a crack-addicted Peppers struggled to live; doctors
had to revive her four times in six weeks.
Peppers has not smoked crack since her recovery. But nearly two years
later, prosecutors charged her with abusing her unborn child by taking
cocaine while pregnant.
Peppers accepted a plea agreement at the time because she would only get
two years' probation and could avoid the media attention of a trial. Now
the 35-year-old Greenwood County woman is fighting the law she was
convicted under because she thinks her battle can help other women.
Peppers' lawyer, C. Rauch Wise, will go before the state Supreme Court on
Wednesday to ask justices to overturn their earlier decision that allowed
prosecutors to charge women who take cocaine when their fetuses can live
outside the womb.
Last month, an Horry County woman, Regina McKnight, became the first woman
in the country to be convicted of killing her unborn baby through
crack-cocaine use.
In his argument to the state Supreme Court, Wise plans to point out no
other state has followed South Carolina's lead.
The Attorney General's Office will argue the same reasoning still applies
from the court's 1997 decision.
The ruling said a viable fetus is considered a child and mothers could be
charged with abuse if they took drugs once their unborn child could live
outside the womb.
Punishing pregnant women for illegal drug use has been a sticky issue in
South Carolina for more than a decade. In March 2000, the U.S. Supreme
Court ruled hospitals cannot test pregnant women for drugs without the
women's consent then turn the results over to police.
"The South Carolina Supreme Court stands alone among the 50 states in
permitting the prosecution, conviction and punishment for child
endangerment of pregnant drug users for ingesting substances on which they
are dependent," San Francisco lawyer Daniel Abrahamson wrote in a friend of
the court brief on behalf of seven national and state medical associations.
Supporters, including Attorney General Charlie Condon, say the law is part
of South Carolina's efforts to protect unborn children.
Horry County's chief prosecutor said he tried McKnight on homicide by child
abuse charges because she should have known better than to take drugs while
pregnant.
"Why should a viable fetus, able to live outside the womb, be treated any
different than a month-old infant?" prosecutor Greg Hembree asked.
Wyndi Anderson, the executive director of S.C. Advocates for Pregnant
Women, said, "People across the country can't believe South Carolina can do
this without providing a better network of drug treatment."
Member Comments |
No member comments available...