News (Media Awareness Project) - CN BC: PUB LTE: 'Surrey Solution' Another Money Grab |
Title: | CN BC: PUB LTE: 'Surrey Solution' Another Money Grab |
Published On: | 2001-07-06 |
Source: | Kelowna Capital News (BC) |
Fetched On: | 2008-01-25 14:50:33 |
'SURREY SOLUTION' ANOTHER MONEY GRAB
To the editor:
I'd first like to say "the Surrey solution" is a big mistake ("Landlords
have reason to complain," July 4).
It's just a pathetic and desperate attempt on "The War Against Drugs." On
one hand we have the government talking about decriminalizing the
possession of marijuana and now we are trying to penalize rental property
owners.
It makes no sense to me what they are trying to accomplish here, besides
making up for the loss of photo radar revenue.
This bylaw would be making the owners like the parents of small children
which would be the tenants, who are adults and are responsible for
themselves and their children.
Why not raise the fines on the growers? They are the ones making money from
the illegal grow-op. In most cases the landlord is not going to make any
more money from a tenant that is operating a grow-op. In some cases the
landlord is involved, but that should be investigated when a bust is made.
This looks like a money grab from landlords, they can obviously pay the
fine if they own, at a minimum, a second home .
I guess the Surrey council hasn't thought too hard about this bylaw. How
can they expect a landlord that is in another part of the country to check
up on their houses?
You could make them hire someone to inspect their homes, but then you are
infringing on the tenants' rights. If they were to pass a law allowing
inspections, they would have to be so often that it would just completely
invade the tenants' privacy.
Eventually you will see law suits from all sides.
I have a hard enough time finding a rental home now, it would be impossible
to rent if owners might fear a couple of 20-year-old guys are going to get
them fined.
This is going to become a big case of discrimination.
Should the provincial government start fining municipalities for building
alleys where drug deals can take place, or how about fine BC Hydro for
supplying electricity to houses of illegal grow-ops?
I guess landlords will have to start renting houses to crack dealers and
pimps, since they won't get fined if the tenants are arrested.
This bylaw will not last, it is just an attempt to make more money for the
city, it just simply has not been thought out.
Brandon Weller,
Kelowna
To the editor:
I'd first like to say "the Surrey solution" is a big mistake ("Landlords
have reason to complain," July 4).
It's just a pathetic and desperate attempt on "The War Against Drugs." On
one hand we have the government talking about decriminalizing the
possession of marijuana and now we are trying to penalize rental property
owners.
It makes no sense to me what they are trying to accomplish here, besides
making up for the loss of photo radar revenue.
This bylaw would be making the owners like the parents of small children
which would be the tenants, who are adults and are responsible for
themselves and their children.
Why not raise the fines on the growers? They are the ones making money from
the illegal grow-op. In most cases the landlord is not going to make any
more money from a tenant that is operating a grow-op. In some cases the
landlord is involved, but that should be investigated when a bust is made.
This looks like a money grab from landlords, they can obviously pay the
fine if they own, at a minimum, a second home .
I guess the Surrey council hasn't thought too hard about this bylaw. How
can they expect a landlord that is in another part of the country to check
up on their houses?
You could make them hire someone to inspect their homes, but then you are
infringing on the tenants' rights. If they were to pass a law allowing
inspections, they would have to be so often that it would just completely
invade the tenants' privacy.
Eventually you will see law suits from all sides.
I have a hard enough time finding a rental home now, it would be impossible
to rent if owners might fear a couple of 20-year-old guys are going to get
them fined.
This is going to become a big case of discrimination.
Should the provincial government start fining municipalities for building
alleys where drug deals can take place, or how about fine BC Hydro for
supplying electricity to houses of illegal grow-ops?
I guess landlords will have to start renting houses to crack dealers and
pimps, since they won't get fined if the tenants are arrested.
This bylaw will not last, it is just an attempt to make more money for the
city, it just simply has not been thought out.
Brandon Weller,
Kelowna
Member Comments |
No member comments available...