News (Media Awareness Project) - US: Web: Column: Attack Of The Killer Tomato Cops |
Title: | US: Web: Column: Attack Of The Killer Tomato Cops |
Published On: | 2001-07-24 |
Source: | WorldNetDaily (US Web) |
Fetched On: | 2008-01-25 13:08:21 |
ATTACK OF THE KILLER TOMATO COPS
Ever think about taking up gardening? When I say forget about it, you might
wonder why. After all, according to Vita Sackville-West, "The man who has
planted a garden feels that he has done something for the good of the
world." Sure, but the trouble isn't well-meaning sodbusters and
seed-tossers, it's "well-meaning" drug warriors.
Cops have a hard enough time distinguishing between marijuana and hemp
plants (one will get you high, the other won't); now they're diversifying
their ignorance to include standard garden produce something Glen Coberly
found out the hard way.
While sorting through his tomato vines last week, an unmarked, dark-green
helicopter buzzed overhead, followed moments later by scads of flatfoots
brandishing firearms, ordering Coberly and a visiting friend to hit the
dirt like dropped sacks of potatoes.
"They had their guns out," said Coberly, quoted in the July 20 Middlesex,
Va., Daily Press.
Within minutes, one officer was introducing the two to Ms. Miranda, while
another inspected the contraband crop. A Homer Simpson "Doh!" could
probably be heard for miles because they found no cannabis, just juicy red
tomatoes. Going from sativa to salad is bad news for a drug bust.
The Daily Press headlined the snafu, "Drug agents ketchup to wrong
suspects: Tomato vines, pot similar from the air."
Sure enough, flying over Middlesex County to scope out pot plantations, one
member of the helicopter crew said the tomatoes looked like marijuana
because "the color was right." The officer, according to the Daily Press,
asked not to be named because he was working undercover.
Piffle.
He didn't want to be named because he's a chowderhead. Confusing tomatoes
with dope does not look good on a resume and worse on the 6 o'clock news.
Getting publicly tagged, "Joe Schmoe, the officer who mistook tomatoes for
marijuana," might be a career-inhibiting move (though, considering this is
the government we're talking about here, probably not).
Middlesex County Sheriff Guy Abbot apologized before leaving the scene,
saying later, "[W]e're not perfect; we make mistakes."
Without doubt, this mistake can be blamed on bad policing. The Keystoners
should have double-checked before raiding. Triple-checked. It's not like
the suspect's going to flush the whole crop down the toilet, thus requiring
(or excusing) a "dynamic entry" or no-knock-style raid. Besides, the day
after the raid the same officer who explained that tomatoes look like pot
from the air because of the color admitted that the hue could have been
obscured by the cloudy skies.
Catch that? On an overcast day, we treat word from an airborne officer like
gospel. What is this, Saturday morning cartoons?
Before police rush in like Power Rangers, I would hope they'd use better
recon than some guy in a chopper with less than great visibility. Neither
the AP nor Daily Press articles filed on the incident confirm any police
fact-checking before going off half-cocked.
Kid Icarus spots some leafy stuff, and it's gung-ho, Geronimo!
Worse, this was a major operation. The antidrug team that descended upon
Coberly involved the National Guard, state police and a local narcotics
taskforce. What if Coberly was showing his friend a pistol or rifle at the
time of the raid? People who own guns do that sort of thing. Let's say he's
just bought a new shotgun and the two are talking about duck hunting: "Hold
on, let me show you my new Remington."
He'd run inside while his friend picks a few tomatoes and then hear the
"whump-whump-whump" of the chopper get closer as he stepped outside,
looking up to spy the bird circling overhead.
Maybe by then the police have already converged on the house, running out
back, where the chopper pilot tells them their suspect is armed, shouting:
"Drop the gun!"
Police raids not being common occurrences during produce-picking sessions,
Coberly might spin around "What?" a bit confused, gun still in hand.
Which do you think he'd sense first? The physical shock of the 9mm. slug
penetrating his body or the audible register of the pistol? Many bullets,
interestingly enough, move quicker than the speed of sound.
And, in reality, it wouldn't even have to be a gun. In high-stress
situations, police get less than keen with distinguishing weapons from
whatever else. Remember Amadou Diallo, shot multiple times by New York
police for brandishing a loaded wallet? In "Shakedown: How the Government
Screws You From A to Z," James Bovard recounts the case of Erdman Bascomb,
killed by Seattle cops when they stormed his apartment and shot him,
thinking the TV remote in his hand was a gun.
You might want to consult the props department, but for the tomato raid, a
garden hoe would probably suffice just fine.
Sure the shooting would be justifiable. They always are. The guy had a gun,
maybe; of course, the police had to fire. What else do you expect them to
do, get shot?
A better question is to ask why they showed up in the first place.
What fewer and fewer people seem to expect from police is police work.
Investigation is the science of evidence collection and proper
interpretations of that evidence. A few flyovers in overcast skies looking
at a plant that can only be distinguished by its color (and just think
about how many other plants besides tomatoes share the same shade of green
as do cannabis plants) is hardly good evidence collection, and, given the
conditions, worse interpretation is inevitable.
Given that, what we should expect before police rush in endangering their
own lives and, even more importantly, the lives of citizens that are
innocent until proven guilty is a little verification. They should have
verified what the chopper said, peeked over the fence, or something, for
pity's sake. Instead they stormed in, armed, to arrest a guy for growing
salsa ingredients.
"We're just trying to do our best to protect citizens," said Abbott. Yeah?
Well, how about looking before you leap, next time? That's sure a start.
And as for the rest of us, always be wary of people looking to do
"something for the good of the world," especially drug warriors.
Ever think about taking up gardening? When I say forget about it, you might
wonder why. After all, according to Vita Sackville-West, "The man who has
planted a garden feels that he has done something for the good of the
world." Sure, but the trouble isn't well-meaning sodbusters and
seed-tossers, it's "well-meaning" drug warriors.
Cops have a hard enough time distinguishing between marijuana and hemp
plants (one will get you high, the other won't); now they're diversifying
their ignorance to include standard garden produce something Glen Coberly
found out the hard way.
While sorting through his tomato vines last week, an unmarked, dark-green
helicopter buzzed overhead, followed moments later by scads of flatfoots
brandishing firearms, ordering Coberly and a visiting friend to hit the
dirt like dropped sacks of potatoes.
"They had their guns out," said Coberly, quoted in the July 20 Middlesex,
Va., Daily Press.
Within minutes, one officer was introducing the two to Ms. Miranda, while
another inspected the contraband crop. A Homer Simpson "Doh!" could
probably be heard for miles because they found no cannabis, just juicy red
tomatoes. Going from sativa to salad is bad news for a drug bust.
The Daily Press headlined the snafu, "Drug agents ketchup to wrong
suspects: Tomato vines, pot similar from the air."
Sure enough, flying over Middlesex County to scope out pot plantations, one
member of the helicopter crew said the tomatoes looked like marijuana
because "the color was right." The officer, according to the Daily Press,
asked not to be named because he was working undercover.
Piffle.
He didn't want to be named because he's a chowderhead. Confusing tomatoes
with dope does not look good on a resume and worse on the 6 o'clock news.
Getting publicly tagged, "Joe Schmoe, the officer who mistook tomatoes for
marijuana," might be a career-inhibiting move (though, considering this is
the government we're talking about here, probably not).
Middlesex County Sheriff Guy Abbot apologized before leaving the scene,
saying later, "[W]e're not perfect; we make mistakes."
Without doubt, this mistake can be blamed on bad policing. The Keystoners
should have double-checked before raiding. Triple-checked. It's not like
the suspect's going to flush the whole crop down the toilet, thus requiring
(or excusing) a "dynamic entry" or no-knock-style raid. Besides, the day
after the raid the same officer who explained that tomatoes look like pot
from the air because of the color admitted that the hue could have been
obscured by the cloudy skies.
Catch that? On an overcast day, we treat word from an airborne officer like
gospel. What is this, Saturday morning cartoons?
Before police rush in like Power Rangers, I would hope they'd use better
recon than some guy in a chopper with less than great visibility. Neither
the AP nor Daily Press articles filed on the incident confirm any police
fact-checking before going off half-cocked.
Kid Icarus spots some leafy stuff, and it's gung-ho, Geronimo!
Worse, this was a major operation. The antidrug team that descended upon
Coberly involved the National Guard, state police and a local narcotics
taskforce. What if Coberly was showing his friend a pistol or rifle at the
time of the raid? People who own guns do that sort of thing. Let's say he's
just bought a new shotgun and the two are talking about duck hunting: "Hold
on, let me show you my new Remington."
He'd run inside while his friend picks a few tomatoes and then hear the
"whump-whump-whump" of the chopper get closer as he stepped outside,
looking up to spy the bird circling overhead.
Maybe by then the police have already converged on the house, running out
back, where the chopper pilot tells them their suspect is armed, shouting:
"Drop the gun!"
Police raids not being common occurrences during produce-picking sessions,
Coberly might spin around "What?" a bit confused, gun still in hand.
Which do you think he'd sense first? The physical shock of the 9mm. slug
penetrating his body or the audible register of the pistol? Many bullets,
interestingly enough, move quicker than the speed of sound.
And, in reality, it wouldn't even have to be a gun. In high-stress
situations, police get less than keen with distinguishing weapons from
whatever else. Remember Amadou Diallo, shot multiple times by New York
police for brandishing a loaded wallet? In "Shakedown: How the Government
Screws You From A to Z," James Bovard recounts the case of Erdman Bascomb,
killed by Seattle cops when they stormed his apartment and shot him,
thinking the TV remote in his hand was a gun.
You might want to consult the props department, but for the tomato raid, a
garden hoe would probably suffice just fine.
Sure the shooting would be justifiable. They always are. The guy had a gun,
maybe; of course, the police had to fire. What else do you expect them to
do, get shot?
A better question is to ask why they showed up in the first place.
What fewer and fewer people seem to expect from police is police work.
Investigation is the science of evidence collection and proper
interpretations of that evidence. A few flyovers in overcast skies looking
at a plant that can only be distinguished by its color (and just think
about how many other plants besides tomatoes share the same shade of green
as do cannabis plants) is hardly good evidence collection, and, given the
conditions, worse interpretation is inevitable.
Given that, what we should expect before police rush in endangering their
own lives and, even more importantly, the lives of citizens that are
innocent until proven guilty is a little verification. They should have
verified what the chopper said, peeked over the fence, or something, for
pity's sake. Instead they stormed in, armed, to arrest a guy for growing
salsa ingredients.
"We're just trying to do our best to protect citizens," said Abbott. Yeah?
Well, how about looking before you leap, next time? That's sure a start.
And as for the rest of us, always be wary of people looking to do
"something for the good of the world," especially drug warriors.
Member Comments |
No member comments available...