News (Media Awareness Project) - CN BC: PUB LTE: It Is A Right To Get High, Say Two From Victoria |
Title: | CN BC: PUB LTE: It Is A Right To Get High, Say Two From Victoria |
Published On: | 2001-08-14 |
Source: | Campbell River Mirror (CN BC) |
Fetched On: | 2008-01-25 10:47:28 |
IT IS A RIGHT TO GET HIGH, SAY TWO FROM VICTORIA
Re: On the pot patrol, Aug. 10
Why didn't your reporter ask Sgt. Dwight Dammann a few questions like these?
1. The Charter of Rights and Freedoms implies that citizens have the
right to pursue their own form of happiness so long as they hurt no
one else. Thus it seems Canadians have the right to ingest any drug,
however harmful. Why does the government feel it has the right to
punish individuals for what they choose to ingest into their own
bodies?
2. Is it your position that the police are duty bound to enforce any
law no matter how unjust? Perhaps I should remind you that Adolph
Eichmann protested he was simply following orders when he assisted in
implementing Hitler's Final Solution but the Israelis hanged him
anyway. Did Eichmann get a raw deal in your estimation? Would you
feel hard done by if you were sentenced to a few years in jail for
your part in enforcing drug prohibition, a strategy many have
characterized as a state-sanctioned pogrom against an identifiable
minority of innocent people?
3. If drugs are banned because they are harmful to users, why, then,
are tobacco and alcohol not banned? Doesn't this seem unfair to those
who prefer illegal drugs? If we ban one harmful drug, shouldn't we
ban all harmful drugs?
4. Is it not true that banning a drug cuts the users off from access
to drugs of known potency and purity and thereby harms them far more
than would otherwise be the case? Weren't thousands of Americans
poisoned or blinded during Prohibition? Didn't the problems vanish
when alcohol was legalized again?
5. The 1973 Le Dain Commission concluded, "There appears to be little
permanent physiological damage from chronic use of pure opiate
narcotics." Why, then, ban heroin?
6. If prohibition is so great, why did America give up on Prohibition?
7. Is it not true that if drugs and prostitution were legalized, the
power of the Hells Angels would be severely curtailed? After all,
Prohibition created Al Capone, not the other way around.
8. Is it not true that if marijuana were legalized, marijuana grow
operations would be no more dangerous, do no more damage and steal no
more hydro than the average tomato grow operation?
9. I've been told that police officers support laws like our drug
laws because they increase crime and hence police budgets and police
power. In fact, I'm told they would be in seventh heaven if tobacco
and/or alcohol were banned. Would you care to comment?
For me, there is no more reason to punish drug users and dealers
today than there was in the past to hang witches, lynch blacks,
incarcerate Japanese Canadians or gas Jews.
Alan and Eleanor Randell Victoria
Re: On the pot patrol, Aug. 10
Why didn't your reporter ask Sgt. Dwight Dammann a few questions like these?
1. The Charter of Rights and Freedoms implies that citizens have the
right to pursue their own form of happiness so long as they hurt no
one else. Thus it seems Canadians have the right to ingest any drug,
however harmful. Why does the government feel it has the right to
punish individuals for what they choose to ingest into their own
bodies?
2. Is it your position that the police are duty bound to enforce any
law no matter how unjust? Perhaps I should remind you that Adolph
Eichmann protested he was simply following orders when he assisted in
implementing Hitler's Final Solution but the Israelis hanged him
anyway. Did Eichmann get a raw deal in your estimation? Would you
feel hard done by if you were sentenced to a few years in jail for
your part in enforcing drug prohibition, a strategy many have
characterized as a state-sanctioned pogrom against an identifiable
minority of innocent people?
3. If drugs are banned because they are harmful to users, why, then,
are tobacco and alcohol not banned? Doesn't this seem unfair to those
who prefer illegal drugs? If we ban one harmful drug, shouldn't we
ban all harmful drugs?
4. Is it not true that banning a drug cuts the users off from access
to drugs of known potency and purity and thereby harms them far more
than would otherwise be the case? Weren't thousands of Americans
poisoned or blinded during Prohibition? Didn't the problems vanish
when alcohol was legalized again?
5. The 1973 Le Dain Commission concluded, "There appears to be little
permanent physiological damage from chronic use of pure opiate
narcotics." Why, then, ban heroin?
6. If prohibition is so great, why did America give up on Prohibition?
7. Is it not true that if drugs and prostitution were legalized, the
power of the Hells Angels would be severely curtailed? After all,
Prohibition created Al Capone, not the other way around.
8. Is it not true that if marijuana were legalized, marijuana grow
operations would be no more dangerous, do no more damage and steal no
more hydro than the average tomato grow operation?
9. I've been told that police officers support laws like our drug
laws because they increase crime and hence police budgets and police
power. In fact, I'm told they would be in seventh heaven if tobacco
and/or alcohol were banned. Would you care to comment?
For me, there is no more reason to punish drug users and dealers
today than there was in the past to hang witches, lynch blacks,
incarcerate Japanese Canadians or gas Jews.
Alan and Eleanor Randell Victoria
Member Comments |
No member comments available...