"AMERICANS ARE READY TO TAKE SECOND LOOK AT WAR ON DRUGS."

WASHINGTON - The high esteem in which former Rep. Asa Hutchinson of Arkansas
is held by his colleagues was demonstrated by the 98-1 Senate vote
confirming him last month as the new director of the Drug Enforcement
Administration.

Even more telling was the fact that Rep. John Conyers of Michigan, the
senior Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee and an ardent opponent of
the impeachment of President Clinton, appeared at the Senate Judiciary
Committee hearing to praise Hutchinson, who had been one of the Republican
House managers presenting the case against Clinton to the full Senate.

In his four and a half years in the House, Hutchinson, a former U.S.
attorney, earned an estimable reputation as a thoughtful conservative and,
as liberals like Conyers and Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick
Leahy of Vermont affirmed, as a fair-minded advocate.

Hutchinson will need all his skills in his new job, for the nation is
clearly about to embark on a long-overdue debate on the so-called "war on
drugs." The DEA is, as the name implies, primarily a law-enforcement agency,
but John Walters, Bush's choice to head the White House Office of National
Drug Control Policy, has been in limbo, awaiting a confirmation hearing
since May.

Many of the same Democrats who welcomed Hutchinson's nomination have argued
that Walters' hard-line approach, emphasizing interdiction and incarceration
over education and treatment, makes him the wrong choice for "drug czar." At
least until Walters' fate is resolved, Hutchinson is in the hot seat on Bush
administration policy toward drugs.

During the past three decades, the United States has invested billions in
fighting the scourge of drugs, and more and more serious people are
questioning its effectiveness. The critics range from conservatives like
Bill Buckley and New Mexico Gov. Gary Johnson to an array of liberals, and
they are having an impact on public opinion. While few agree with the
editors of the influential British newspaper, The Economist, which last
month laid out at length "the case for legalizing drugs," many more are
expressing their doubts about current policies.

A Pew Research Center survey last February found that three out of four
Americans believe "we are losing the drug war," and by a margin of 52
percent to 35 percent they said drug use "should be treated as a disease,
not a crime."

In a recent issue of the American Prospect magazine, California journalist
Peter Schrag pointed to the growing trend in the states, where initiatives
allowing medical use of marijuana or mandating treatment rather than jail
for drug-users have been winning large public majorities.

Hutchinson was dodgy in his confirmation hearing on the question of sending
federal agents out to arrest doctors who prescribe marijuana as a pain- and
nausea-relieving agent for cancer patients and other seriously ill people,
as eight states now allow. The Supreme Court held earlier this year that the
feds have that authority. When Hutchinson was asked if he would use it, he
said it was something on which he needed to confer with the attorney
general, adding that it was important "that we do not send the wrong signal
. . . that marijuana use is an acceptable practice."

But Hutchinson also applauded a bipartisan bill, crafted by Leahy and the
Judiciary Committee's ranking Republican, Sen. Orrin Hatch of Utah, to
expand funding of drug-treatment programs, especially for prisoners and
youths, and to increase the number of drug courts, where judges can order
nonviolent drug offenders to undergo treatment and continuing tests, rather
than put them in jail.

Hutchinson took over his DEA duties last week at the same time the
Department of Justice bragged that more people than ever are in federal
prison on drug charges and are serving longer sentences. That report showed
there were more suspects arrested in 1999 on charges involving marijuana
than for powder or crack cocaine. A higher portion of the marijuana suspects
who wound up in federal prison were simply users than was the case with any
of the hard drugs.

That raises obvious questions about the priorities of federal
drug-enforcement agents and prosecutors. No one seems to know how many
people are in state prisons for simple possession of marijuana. But in 1998,
those prisons held 236,800 people convicted on drug charges - 57 percent
more than had been there in 1990.

The National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University
estimated in 1998 that 70 percent to 85 percent of all state prison inmates
- - not just those convicted on drug charges - need treatment, but only 13
percent of them get it.

The whole "war on drugs" cries out for re-examination.