A HIGHLY DEBATABLE WAR ON DRUGS

Many People Are Questioning The Effectiveness Of The Billions Of Dollars
Spent On Fighting The Drugs Scourge

The high esteem in which former representative Asa Hutchinson of Arkansas
is held by his colleagues was demonstrated by the 98 to 1 Senate vote
confirming him last month as the new director of the Drug Enforcement
Administration. Even more telling was the fact that Rep. John Conyers of
Michigan, the senior Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee and an
ardent opponent of the impeachment of President Clinton, appeared at the
Senate Judiciary Committee hearing to praise Hutchinson, who had been one
of the Republican House managers presenting the case against Clinton to the
full Senate.

In his 4 years in the House, Hutchinson, a former U.S. attorney, earned an
estimable reputation as a thoughtful conservative and, as such liberals as
Conyers and Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy of Vermont
affirmed, as a fair-minded advocate.

Hutchinson will need all his skills in his new job, for the nation is
clearly about to embark on a long-overdue debate on the so-called war on
drugs. The DEA is, as the name implies, primarily a law-enforcement agency,
but John Walters, Bush's choice to head the White House Office of National
Drug Control Policy, has been in limbo, awaiting a confirmation hearing
since May.

Many of the same Democrats who welcomed Hutchinson's nomination have argued
that Walters's hard-line approach, emphasizing interdiction and
incarceration over education and treatment, makes him the wrong choice for
"drug czar." At least until Walters's fate is resolved, Hutchinson is in
the hot seat on Bush administration policy toward drugs.

During the past three decades the United States has invested billions in
fighting the drugs scourge, and more and more serious people are
questioning its effectiveness. The critics range from conservatives such as
Bill Buckley and New Mexico Gov. Gary Johnson to an array of liberals, and
they are having an impact on public opinion. While few agree with the
editors of the British journal the Economist, which last month laid out at
length "the case for legalizing drugs," many more are expressing their
doubts about current policies.

A Pew Research Center survey last February found that three out of four
Americans believe "we are losing the drug war," and by a margin of 52
percent to 35 percent they said drug use "should be treated as a disease,
not a crime." In a recent issue of the American Prospect magazine,
California journalist Peter Schrag pointed to the growing trend in the
states, where initiatives allowing medical use of marijuana or mandating
treatment rather than jail for drug-users have been winning large public
majorities.

Hutchinson was dodgy in his confirmation hearing on the question of sending
federal agents out to arrest doctors who prescribe marijuana as a pain- and
nausea-relieving agent for cancer patients and other seriously ill people,
as eight states now allow. The Supreme Court held earlier this year that
the feds have that authority. When Hutchinson was asked if he would use it,
he said it was something on which he needed to confer with the attorney
general, adding that it was important "that we do not send the wrong signal
. . . that marijuana use is an acceptable practice."

But Hutchinson applauded a bipartisan bill, crafted by Leahy and the
Judiciary Committee's ranking Republican, Sen. Orrin Hatch of Utah, to
expand funding of drug treatment programs, especially for prisoners and
youths, and to increase the number of drug courts, where judges can order
nonviolent drug offenders to undergo treatment and tests, rather than put
them in jail.

Hutchinson took over his DEA duties last week at the same time the
Department of Justice bragged that more people than ever are in federal
prison on drug charges and are serving longer sentences. That report showed
there were more suspects arrested in 1999 on charges involving marijuana
than for powder or crack cocaine. A higher portion of the marijuana
suspects who wound up in federal prison were simply users than was the case
with any hard drug.

That raises obvious questions about the priorities of federal drug
enforcement agents and prosecutors. No one seems to know how many people
are in state prisons for simple possession of marijuana. But in 1998 those
prisons held 236,800 people convicted on drug charges - 57 percent more
than had been there in 1990.

The National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University
estimated in 1998 that 70 percent to 85 percent of all state prison inmates
- - not just those convicted on drug charges - need treatment, but only 13
percent of them receive it.

The whole "war on drugs" cries out for reexamination.