News (Media Awareness Project) - US GA: Measure: Toughen No-Knock Warrant Requirements |
Title: | US GA: Measure: Toughen No-Knock Warrant Requirements |
Published On: | 2007-02-28 |
Source: | Ledger-Enquirer (Columbus,GA) |
Fetched On: | 2008-01-12 11:28:12 |
MEASURE: TOUGHEN NO-KNOCK WARRANT REQUIREMENTS
ATLANTA - A bipartisan group of lawmakers called for tighter
restrictions Wednesday on how police use "no-knock" warrants in the
wake of a shootout that left an elderly woman dead after plainclothes
officers stormed her home unannounced.
A measure by state Sen. Vincent Fort, D-Atlanta, would allow judges to
grant the warrants only if police officers can prove a "significant
and imminent danger to human life."
The measure, which was co-sponsored by Republican state Sen. Jeff
Mullis, was prompted by a Nov. 21 shootout between Kathryn Johnston
and three Atlanta Police officers during a no-knock search for drugs
in her northwest Atlanta home. Johnston, who was 92, was killed and
three officers were wounded.
Fulton County prosecutors said they intend to seek murder charges
against three of the officers who raided the woman's home. Police say
Johnston fired a handgun and officers returned fire. An autopsy report
revealed Johnston was shot five or six times in the chest, arms, legs
and feet.
The shooting has brought renewed scrutiny to the police use of
no-knock warrants, which are typically used to search for drugs and
weapons. The special warrants are intended to prevent suspects from
getting rid of evidence or to protect officers from suspects who can
show a threat of violence.
Yet an Associated Press review of all no-knock warrants filed in
Atlanta's Fulton County last year found that authorities often give
scant detail when applying for the warrants.
Critics of Fort's measure argue that police departments should impose
their own standards. Cordele Police Chief Dwayne Orrick said a
supervisor must approve warrants before they're sent to the local
judge, who he said regularly batters them with questions about why a
warrant is needed.
"You've got to look at each case on a case-by-case basis," he said.
"That's the purpose of a judge, to review the affidavit and determine
if there's probable cause."
In the Johnston case, the system appears to have broken down. Officers
obtained the warrant by telling a magistrate judge that an undercover
informant had told them that Johnston's home had surveillance cameras
monitored carefully by a drug dealer named "Sam."
Days after the shooting, a man claiming to be the informant told a
television station that he never purchased drugs at his home,
prompting Atlanta Police to call for a review of all its procedures.
Fort said the case was a warning that it's become too easy to obtain
the warrants.
"Every citizen ought to be safe and secure in their homes," he said.
"A no-knock warrant should be a special warrant, not a standard. And
that's what it's evolved into."
ATLANTA - A bipartisan group of lawmakers called for tighter
restrictions Wednesday on how police use "no-knock" warrants in the
wake of a shootout that left an elderly woman dead after plainclothes
officers stormed her home unannounced.
A measure by state Sen. Vincent Fort, D-Atlanta, would allow judges to
grant the warrants only if police officers can prove a "significant
and imminent danger to human life."
The measure, which was co-sponsored by Republican state Sen. Jeff
Mullis, was prompted by a Nov. 21 shootout between Kathryn Johnston
and three Atlanta Police officers during a no-knock search for drugs
in her northwest Atlanta home. Johnston, who was 92, was killed and
three officers were wounded.
Fulton County prosecutors said they intend to seek murder charges
against three of the officers who raided the woman's home. Police say
Johnston fired a handgun and officers returned fire. An autopsy report
revealed Johnston was shot five or six times in the chest, arms, legs
and feet.
The shooting has brought renewed scrutiny to the police use of
no-knock warrants, which are typically used to search for drugs and
weapons. The special warrants are intended to prevent suspects from
getting rid of evidence or to protect officers from suspects who can
show a threat of violence.
Yet an Associated Press review of all no-knock warrants filed in
Atlanta's Fulton County last year found that authorities often give
scant detail when applying for the warrants.
Critics of Fort's measure argue that police departments should impose
their own standards. Cordele Police Chief Dwayne Orrick said a
supervisor must approve warrants before they're sent to the local
judge, who he said regularly batters them with questions about why a
warrant is needed.
"You've got to look at each case on a case-by-case basis," he said.
"That's the purpose of a judge, to review the affidavit and determine
if there's probable cause."
In the Johnston case, the system appears to have broken down. Officers
obtained the warrant by telling a magistrate judge that an undercover
informant had told them that Johnston's home had surveillance cameras
monitored carefully by a drug dealer named "Sam."
Days after the shooting, a man claiming to be the informant told a
television station that he never purchased drugs at his home,
prompting Atlanta Police to call for a review of all its procedures.
Fort said the case was a warning that it's become too easy to obtain
the warrants.
"Every citizen ought to be safe and secure in their homes," he said.
"A no-knock warrant should be a special warrant, not a standard. And
that's what it's evolved into."
Member Comments |
No member comments available...