Well I know some of you guys have seriously well trained ears; my comment did refer to those of us who have less trained ears... to me its somantics past a certain point, if it sounds like shit, it sounds like shit. However, the shit scale isn`t the same for everyone and unless you are obsessed with quality at all levels, it is less important than what you are trying to communicate with your performance. Furthermore, regardless of the quality of sound you're bringing, I can count (on my two paws) the number of times I`ve played on systems well calibrated enough to be able to get that quality difference accross to an audience(show of hands who disagrees with this)... So, there are many factors in performance, and though the quality of sound is definitely one of them, making it the highest standard possible seems futile unless you are also bringing the highest quality sound system with you when you perfom.

Ufot=there are many cents, those are my 2

Lost in a dream
Don't know which way to go
If you are all that you seem
Then baby I'm moving way too slow

I've been a fool before
Wouldn't like to get my love caught
In the slammin' door
How about some information--please

Straight up now tell me
Do you really want to love me forever oh oh oh
Or am I caught in a hit and run
Straight up now tell me
Is it gonna be you and me together oh oh oh
Are you just having fun

Ufot-go paula-go paula!

stop being so analog ian...

Ufot-imdigitalandurnot!

this is almost a repost of something I wrote before, but my feelings, regardless of format are as follows :

-I always end up paying for things I believe in and love
-99% of the time I don`t or won`t pay for pop artists or commercial music
-I generally try to support local artists, independant artists and small labels before big ones

As far as the method, its 2008, debating whether or not playing cd`s or vinyl is better is so 2003, the art of dj`ing has come much further than just the medium, it has extended beyond... the whole wav Vs mp3 thing is fucking stupid people, seriously... I challenge any one person here who thinks they can tell the fucking difference to come to my studio to be blindfolded and I will play a record, a wav, a 128bit and 320bit mp3 and quiz them on which is which, and I GUARANTEE they won`t be able to tell the fucking difference.

I think dj`s and music affectionados should pay for what they love and believe in, whether they are performing or just collecting and listenning.... and if some freebies come by now and then, well sweet galaxy treat!

Ufot=music lover

Incest

155. (1) Every one commits incest who, knowing that another person is by blood relationship his or her parent, child, brother, sister, grandparent or grandchild, as the case may be, has sexual intercourse with that person.

Punishment

(2) Every one who commits incest is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years.
Defence

(3) No accused shall be determined by a court to be guilty of an offence under this section if the accused was under restraint, duress or fear of the person with whom the accused had the sexual intercourse at the time the sexual intercourse occurred.
Definition of “brother” and “sister”

(4) In this section, "brother" and "sister" , respectively, include half-brother and half-sister.
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 155; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 21.

156. to 158. [Repealed, R.S., 1985, c. 19 (3rd Supp.), s. 2]

Ufot-bwahaahhaa

THanks caro :D And yes, it is amusing, but if you really wana laugh, you should read the charter of rights and freedoms... women are considered to be like the disabled... BTW< im not kidding, it was upadted in the 80s.... hahahah

Ufot-oops, they wrote it again

ya, you have to be 18+ to have butt sex... weird eh? Some states in teh US it is still illegal to "sodomize"

BTW, here is the full listing of the laws in Canada, great resource >> [ laws.justice.gc.ca ]

Ufot-where'd I put that?

I always wonder how much money those bot progs generate for the spawners... like I wonder how many people reply to those nigerian bank guys who ask for help transferring millions. I wonder how many people actually fall for that shit... I figure the spammers keep doing it because they must make money, otherwise, whats the point./...

Ufot=warm emails from cold places in the heart

yaya... bot accounts, gotta love em....

Ufot-i see ur bot and raise u 2 worms

yes

Ufot-stale

no, but it can be insightfull for some and entertaining for others... I doubt many people have ever read this, I know I haven't.... until today that is...

Ufot-the power of the mind

3 days max... but sometimes stale smokes are good :D (in a gross way ofcourse)

Ufot-god i love 2 smoke

oh and Laurent, you should know this bro :

Sexual interference

151. Every person who, for a sexual purpose, touches, directly or indirectly, with a part of the body or with an object, any part of the body of a person under the age of 16 years

(a) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years and to a minimum punishment of imprisonment for a term of forty-five days; or

(b) is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding eighteen months and to a minimum punishment of imprisonment for a term of fourteen days.

R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 151; R.S., 1985, c. 19 (3rd Supp.), s. 1; 2005, c. 32, s. 3; 2008, c. 6, s. 54.

Ufot-the law, it is in effect

Based on everyones interest in sex recently and some disconcerting remarks, here's a copy of the Sexual Offences section of the Criminal code of Canada :D

Sexual Offences
Consent no defence

150.1 (1) Subject to subsections (2) to (2.2), when an accused is charged with an offence under section 151 or 152 or subsection 153(1), 160(3) or 173(2) or is charged with an offence under section 271, 272 or 273 in respect of a complainant under the age of 16 years, it is not a defence that the complainant consented to the activity that forms the subject-matter of the charge.

Exception — complainant aged 12 or 13

(2) When an accused is charged with an offence under section 151 or 152, subsection 173(2) or section 271 in respect of a complainant who is 12 years of age or more but under the age of 14 years, it is a defence that the complainant consented to the activity that forms the subject-matter of the charge if the accused
(a) is less than two years older than the complainant; and

(b) is not in a position of trust or authority towards the complainant, is not a person with whom the complainant is in a relationship of dependency and is not in a relationship with the complainant that is exploitative of the complainant.

Exception — complainant aged 14 or 15

(2.1) When an accused is charged with an offence under section 151 or 152, subsection 173(2) or section 271 in respect of a complainant who is 14 years of age or more but under the age of 16 years, it is a defence that the complainant consented to the activity that forms the subject-matter of the charge if
(a) the accused

(i) is less than five years older than the complainant; and

(ii) is not in a position of trust or authority towards the complainant, is not a person with whom the complainant is in a relationship of dependency and is not in a relationship with the complainant that is exploitative of the complainant; or


(b) the accused is married to the complainant.

Exception for transitional purposes

(2.2) When the accused referred to in subsection (2.1) is five or more years older than the complainant, it is a defence that the complainant consented to the activity that forms the subject-matter of the charge if, on the day on which this subsection comes into force,
(a) the accused is the common-law partner of the complainant, or has been cohabiting with the complainant in a conjugal relationship for a period of less than one year and they have had or are expecting to have a child as a result of the relationship; and

(b) the accused is not in a position of trust or authority towards the complainant, is not a person with whom the complainant is in a relationship of dependency and is not in a relationship with the complainant that is exploitative of the complainant.

Exemption for accused aged twelve or thirteen

(3) No person aged twelve or thirteen years shall be tried for an offence under section 151 or 152 or subsection 173(2) unless the person is in a position of trust or authority towards the complainant, is a person with whom the complainant is in a relationship of dependency or is in a relationship with the complainant that is exploitative of the complainant.
Mistake of age

(4) It is not a defence to a charge under section 151 or 152, subsection 160(3) or 173(2), or section 271, 272 or 273 that the accused believed that the complainant was 16 years of age or more at the time the offence is alleged to have been committed unless the accused took all reasonable steps to ascertain the age of the complainant.
Idem

(5) It is not a defence to a charge under section 153, 159, 170, 171 or 172 or subsection 212(2) or (4) that the accused believed that the complainant was eighteen years of age or more at the time the offence is alleged to have been committed unless the accused took all reasonable steps to ascertain the age of the complainant.
Mistake of age

(6) An accused cannot raise a mistaken belief in the age of the complainant in order to invoke a defence under subsection (2) or (2.1) unless the accused took all reasonable steps to ascertain the age of the complainant.
R.S., 1985, c. 19 (3rd Supp.), s. 1; 2005, c. 32, s. 2; 2008, c. 6, ss. 13, 54.

Sexual interference

151. Every person who, for a sexual purpose, touches, directly or indirectly, with a part of the body or with an object, any part of the body of a person under the age of 16 years

(a) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years and to a minimum punishment of imprisonment for a term of forty-five days; or

(b) is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding eighteen months and to a minimum punishment of imprisonment for a term of fourteen days.

R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 151; R.S., 1985, c. 19 (3rd Supp.), s. 1; 2005, c. 32, s. 3; 2008, c. 6, s. 54.

Invitation to sexual touching

152. Every person who, for a sexual purpose, invites, counsels or incites a person under the age of 16 years to touch, directly or indirectly, with a part of the body or with an object, the body of any person, including the body of the person who so invites, counsels or incites and the body of the person under the age of 16 years,

(a) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years and to a minimum punishment of imprisonment for a term of forty-five days; or

(b) is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding eighteen months and to a minimum punishment of imprisonment for a term of fourteen days.

R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 152; R.S., 1985, c. 19 (3rd Supp.), s. 1; 2005, c. 32, s. 3; 2008, c. 6, s. 54.

Sexual exploitation

153. (1) Every person commits an offence who is in a position of trust or authority towards a young person, who is a person with whom the young person is in a relationship of dependency or who is in a relationship with a young person that is exploitative of the young person, and who

(a) for a sexual purpose, touches, directly or indirectly, with a part of the body or with an object, any part of the body of the young person; or

(b) for a sexual purpose, invites, counsels or incites a young person to touch, directly or indirectly, with a part of the body or with an object, the body of any person, including the body of the person who so invites, counsels or incites and the body of the young person.

Punishment

(1.1) Every person who commits an offence under subsection (1)
(a) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years and to a minimum punishment of imprisonment for a term of forty-five days; or

(b) is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding eighteen months and to a minimum punishment of imprisonment for a term of fourteen days.

Inference of sexual exploitation

(1.2) A judge may infer that a person is in a relationship with a young person that is exploitative of the young person from the nature and circumstances of the relationship, including
(a) the age of the young person;

(b) the age difference between the person and the young person;

(c) the evolution of the relationship; and

(d) the degree of control or influence by the person over the young person.

Definition of “young person”

(2) In this section, "young person" means a person 16 years of age or more but under the age of eighteen years.
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 153; R.S., 1985, c. 19 (3rd Supp.), s. 1; 2005, c. 32, s. 4; 2008, c. 6, s. 54.

Sexual exploitation of person with disability

153.1 (1) Every person who is in a position of trust or authority towards a person with a mental or physical disability or who is a person with whom a person with a mental or physical disability is in a relationship of dependency and who, for a sexual purpose, counsels or incites that person to touch, without that person’s consent, his or her own body, the body of the person who so counsels or incites, or the body of any other person, directly or indirectly, with a part of the body or with an object, is guilty of

(a) an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years; or

(b) an offence punishable on summary conviction and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding eighteen months.

Definition of “consent”

(2) Subject to subsection (3), "consent" means, for the purposes of this section, the voluntary agreement of the complainant to engage in the sexual activity in question.
When no consent obtained

(3) No consent is obtained, for the purposes of this section, if
(a) the agreement is expressed by the words or conduct of a person other than the complainant;

(b) the complainant is incapable of consenting to the activity;

(c) the accused counsels or incites the complainant to engage in the activity by abusing a position of trust, power or authority;

(d) the complainant expresses, by words or conduct, a lack of agreement to engage in the activity; or

(e) the complainant, having consented to engage in sexual activity, expresses, by words or conduct, a lack of agreement to continue to engage in the activity.

Subsection (3) not limiting

(4) Nothing in subsection (3) shall be construed as limiting the circumstances in which no consent is obtained.
When belief in consent not a defence

(5) It is not a defence to a charge under this section that the accused believed that the complainant consented to the activity that forms the subject-matter of the charge if
(a) the accused’s belief arose from the accused’s

(i) self-induced intoxication, or

(ii) recklessness or wilful blindness; or


(b) the accused did not take reasonable steps, in the circumstances known to the accused at the time, to ascertain that the complainant was consenting.

Accused’s belief as to consent

(6) If an accused alleges that he or she believed that the complainant consented to the conduct that is the subject-matter of the charge, a judge, if satisfied that there is sufficient evidence and that, if believed by the jury, the evidence would constitute a defence, shall instruct the jury, when reviewing all the evidence relating to the determination of the honesty of the accused’s belief, to consider the presence or absence of reasonable grounds for that belief.
1998, c. 9, s. 2.

154. [Repealed, R.S., 1985, c. 19 (3rd Supp.), s. 1]

Incest

155. (1) Every one commits incest who, knowing that another person is by blood relationship his or her parent, child, brother, sister, grandparent or grandchild, as the case may be, has sexual intercourse with that person.

Punishment

(2) Every one who commits incest is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years.
Defence

(3) No accused shall be determined by a court to be guilty of an offence under this section if the accused was under restraint, duress or fear of the person with whom the accused had the sexual intercourse at the time the sexual intercourse occurred.
Definition of “brother” and “sister”

(4) In this section, "brother" and "sister" , respectively, include half-brother and half-sister.
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 155; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 21.

156. to 158. [Repealed, R.S., 1985, c. 19 (3rd Supp.), s. 2]

Anal intercourse

159. (1) Every person who engages in an act of anal intercourse is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years or is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.

Exception

(2) Subsection (1) does not apply to any act engaged in, in private, between
(a) husband and wife, or

(b) any two persons, each of whom is eighteen years of age or more,

both of whom consent to the act.

Idem

(3) For the purposes of subsection (2),
(a) an act shall be deemed not to have been engaged in in private if it is engaged in in a public place or if more than two persons take part or are present; and

(b) a person shall be deemed not to consent to an act

(i) if the consent is extorted by force, threats or fear of bodily harm or is obtained by false and fraudulent misrepresentations respecting the nature and quality of the act, or

(ii) if the court is satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that the person could not have consented to the act by reason of mental disability.


R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 159; R.S., 1985, c. 19 (3rd Supp.), s. 3.

Bestiality

160. (1) Every person who commits bestiality is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years or is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.

Compelling the commission of bestiality

(2) Every person who compels another to commit bestiality is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years or is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.
Bestiality in presence of or by child

(3) Notwithstanding subsection (1), every person who, in the presence of a person under the age of 16 years, commits bestiality or who incites a person under the age of 16 years to commit bestiality is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years or is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 160; R.S., 1985, c. 19 (3rd Supp.), s. 3; 2008, c. 6, s. 54.

Order of prohibition

161. (1) When an offender is convicted, or is discharged on the conditions prescribed in a probation order under section 730, of an offence referred to in subsection (1.1) in respect of a person who is under the age of 16 years, the court that sentences the offender or directs that the accused be discharged, as the case may be, in addition to any other punishment that may be imposed for that offence or any other condition prescribed in the order of discharge, shall consider making and may make, subject to the conditions or exemptions that the court directs, an order prohibiting the offender from

(a) attending a public park or public swimming area where persons under the age of 16 years are present or can reasonably be expected to be present, or a daycare centre, schoolground, playground or community centre;

(b) seeking, obtaining or continuing any employment, whether or not the employment is remunerated, or becoming or being a volunteer in a capacity, that involves being in a position of trust or authority towards persons under the age of 16 years; or

(c) using a computer system within the meaning of subsection 342.1(2) for the purpose of communicating with a person under the age of 16 years.

Offences

(1.1) The offences for the purpose of subsection (1) are
(a) an offence under section 151, 152, 155 or 159, subsection 160(2) or (3), section 163.1, 170, 171 or 172.1, subsection 173(2) or section 271, 272, 273 or 281;

(b) an offence under section 144 (rape), 145 (attempt to commit rape), 149 (indecent assault on female), 156 (indecent assault on male) or 245 (common assault) or subsection 246(1) (assault with intent) of the Criminal Code, chapter C-34 of the Revised Statutes of Canada, 1970, as it read immediately before January 4, 1983; or

(c) an offence under subsection 146(1) (sexual intercourse with a female under 14) or section 153 (sexual intercourse with step-daughter), 155 (buggery or bestiality), 157 (gross indecency), 166 (parent or guardian procuring defilement) or 167 (householder permitting defilement) of the Criminal Code, chapter C-34 of the Revised Statutes of Canada, 1970, as it read immediately before January 1, 1988.

Duration of prohibition

(2) The prohibition may be for life or for any shorter duration that the court considers desirable and, in the case of a prohibition that is not for life, the prohibition begins on the later of
(a) the date on which the order is made; and

(b) where the offender is sentenced to a term of imprisonment, the date on which the offender is released from imprisonment for the offence, including release on parole, mandatory supervision or statutory release.

Court may vary order

(3) A court that makes an order of prohibition or, where the court is for any reason unable to act, another court of equivalent jurisdiction in the same province, may, on application of the offender or the prosecutor, require the offender to appear before it at any time and, after hearing the parties, that court may vary the conditions prescribed in the order if, in the opinion of the court, the variation is desirable because of changed circumstances after the conditions were prescribed.
Offence

(4) Every person who is bound by an order of prohibition and who does not comply with the order is guilty of
(a) an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years; or

(b) an offence punishable on summary conviction.

R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 161; R.S., 1985, c. 19 (3rd Supp.), s. 4; 1993, c. 45, s. 1; 1995, c. 22, s. 18; 1997, c. 18, s. 4; 1999, c. 31, s. 67; 2002, c. 13, s. 4; 2005, c. 32, s. 5; 2008, c. 6, s. 54.

Voyeurism

162. (1) Every one commits an offence who, surreptitiously, observes — including by mechanical or electronic means — or makes a visual recording of a person who is in circumstances that give rise to a reasonable expectation of privacy, if

(a) the person is in a place in which a person can reasonably be expected to be nude, to expose his or her genital organs or anal region or her breasts, or to be engaged in explicit sexual activity;

(b) the person is nude, is exposing his or her genital organs or anal region or her breasts, or is engaged in explicit sexual activity, and the observation or recording is done for the purpose of observing or recording a person in such a state or engaged in such an activity; or

(c) the observation or recording is done for a sexual purpose.

Definition of "visual recording"

(2) In this section, “visual recording” includes a photographic, film or video recording made by any means.
Exemption

(3) Paragraphs (1)(a) and (b) do not apply to a peace officer who, under the authority of a warrant issued under section 487.01, is carrying out any activity referred to in those paragraphs.
Printing, publication, etc., of voyeuristic recordings

(4) Every one commits an offence who, knowing that a recording was obtained by the commission of an offence under subsection (1), prints, copies, publishes, distributes, circulates, sells, advertises or makes available the recording, or has the recording in his or her possession for the purpose of printing, copying, publishing, distributing, circulating, selling or advertising it or making it available.
Punishment

(5) Every one who commits an offence under subsection (1) or (4)
(a) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years; or

(b) is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.

Defence

(6) No person shall be convicted of an offence under this section if the acts that are alleged to constitute the offence serve the public good and do not extend beyond what serves the public good.
Question of law, motives

(7) For the purposes of subsection (6),
(a) it is a question of law whether an act serves the public good and whether there is evidence that the act alleged goes beyond what serves the public good, but it is a question of fact whether the act does or does not extend beyond what serves the public good; and

(b) the motives of an accused are irrelevant.

R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 162; R.S., 1985, c. 19 (3rd Supp.), s. 4; 2005, c. 32, s. 6.

Ufot-smarter people get smarter by learning

I said it before, and it is also a first in my lifetime, that the US actually has a better leader than we do... I think Trudeau should step up his game and replace dion, I know he has barely any experience, but he would be a unifying figure whom Canadians would warm to rather quickly, that being said, no doubt on the coat tails of his fathers track record... Though, Im also still convinced that David Suzuki would make the best PM ever, regardless of his lack of economics background, he would be the best representation of modern day Canadia IMHO, a green man for a green future... no soyent required///

Ufot-VOTE SUZUKI '09

I think the government just figured that more people would have babies and we would become a power country with a huge population... population stimulous package through lack of safe sex education??? I bet all those poor gym teachers miss talking about the male ejaculation and the female menstral cycle...LOL, at least the kids these days are still learning about jeebus(sic)

Ufot-"OH NO U DI'NT!!!!"

PLAYGROUND was probably the best venue I ever clubbed at... SONA was a close second before all the geenos slimed their way in there... god I am feeling old today...

Ufot-who remembers when josh wink played storm and built the audience up for 45mins, then stopped :P

hahahahaah.... but seriously, it is retarded that they stopped sex ed, even though it made us all laugh and be slightly embarassed in high school, I doubt a lot kids would've figured out the important shit on their own, let alone know how to put a condom on...

Ufot-schools, sometimes they lose

sex is great... I've always said that the angry people in this world are angry because they just don't get enough sex(or in some cases any), its as simple as that... well that and they probably hold their farts in too, which means they get full of hot air...poor bastards...

Ufot-sex? yes please :D

Cheers bud, it was fun making it, with my new setup, it will be fun making a lot of mixes :)

Ufot-muzik is wut keeps me alive

Im not sure why some of you would wana eat my kitty, but it is kinda funny... thanks godisdead, I know what you mean, 3 kitties are a lot of pussy....

A friend of mine knows someone with a farm, so fingers crossed, that would be awesome, I will keep you guys posted...

Ufot-freedom is a expensive word

Track Listing :

1-drug music - ntfo s.t.s remix
2-beta bug - digital filth - original mix
3-one day my love - d.ramirez remix
4-space dance - danny tenaglia remix
5-road rage - popof remix
6-this town - hook an sling remix
7-konv3rt - klubbheads event mix
8-go watch your mind - electric soulside remix
9-say whoa - sinden remix

Download here >> [ www.rave.ca ]

So this is my first loop based mix on tracktor scratch pro, there are some glitches, but I think its great background party music, hope you enjoy folks, and yes, this time, there is a track listing... As always, any feedback would be greatly welcome...

Ufot-sometimes, you must loopa to be soopa

Craig, it has nothing to do with my women, it has to do with my life and living situation, it just aint ideal for what he needs...

here's a pic of him :



ufot-moving on can hurt, but sometimes it hurts for a reason

Thanks Masa, if you know anyone, please do let me know...

Ufot-not fun, not today

To all cat lovers...



I have an amazing cat who needs a new home asap, he is 4.5years old, extremely friendly and cute and can no longer reside with me.... it makes me sad to think that we may part ways, but my current living situation and life in general are no best suited for his needs; he loves attention and is playfull and loves to go outside.

If anyone can help me find him a new home, it would be greatly appreciated. Serious parties only please pm me.

Ufot-life never gets easy, but it does get hard

perhaps my example of litigation made him second glance his current online persona...

Ufot-fortress of knowledgetude

sorry wait...

fixed :

Laston: Wed Dec 3, 2008 @ 1:58am

not to confuse anyone, but the above cited case was a corporate case, however, there are similar civil trial precedents aswell...

Ufot-yes your honnor, its my honnor

Hey Bliss, got lawyer?

"In a June 2004 case, Barrick Gold Corporation v. Lopehandia, 2004 CanLII 12938 (ON C.A.), the Ontario Court of Appeal increased a trial judge's damage award for internet-based defamation from $15,000 to $75,000, with an additional $50,000 punitive damages, on the grounds that Internet defamation has a distinctive capacity "to cause instantaneous, and irreparable, damage to the business reputation of an individual or corporation by reason of its interactive and globally all-pervasive nature", as well as its potential for being taken at face value. The company in this case was able to prove actual harm by showing that its shareholders had seen the defamatory statements."

there is tons more information HAMMISH, you might wana take some time to read up on our laws here in Canada, cause frankly, ignorance(though it may be bliss) is no excuse in the eyes of the law...

Ufot=justice can be bent to will of the wrong, much as the right

omg U made me rofl!!!

ufot-noice one lyn

who cares about britney, any1 else see that banner add for [ pinkcupid.com ] "meet your lesbian lover"

(+)_(+)

lesbian lovers are awesome...covered in sauce...that is both awesome, and lesbian...

Ufot-what website, where is it, this is the INTERNOT

don't forget to ask screwhead to note that you just called 2 members of this board losers...

Ufot-hammish, fitting name for a troll

its actually captain troll to you lot... ;)

and I tried, for what its worth, to reason with the boy (no man there) but wtv, let the fizzle fuzz

ufot-deaf ears sometimes make efforts seem like a ghost

honnestly... what a complete waste of time and energy... pathetic really... definitely not surprising, at least not anymore... Bliss, can you honestly not find anything better to do with your life? You talk about all your contributions, well why not just re-invest all the energy you`ve been jizzing all over this poor board into your music or your "gigs"... dont you think it would be a better use of your time?

And for the record, as peacefull as you may claim to be, you certainly stir the pot more often than not, and only fall back your supposedly peacefull all loving ways once people(big surprise here) begin to get angry and carried away... you want your ego to get stroked for real? Then how about you start acting your age and bringing a bit more positivity to this board, it might not get you as much attention as your perpetual pestering of people does, but it will earn you admiration and respect, something your current habits can only acheive in a negative light...

Ufot-Two things can true at the same time, but one will always sound better than the other

[ www.collegehumor.com ]

Ufot-hehehehe

um... ipod?

Ufot-macs, they may be pretty but they aint so smart...

zunes are on special at futureslop, 8g for 100bones aNd 80g for 200bones... dem some pretty good prices...

Ufot-zunish, maybe a little

to GAMOS ~ Ya man, thats the movie I was talkin about, you can pick it up at boite noire they usually have dvd copies for sale or you can just buy it online... I agree that the origins of jungle arent that deep, but panaseea's interview was awesome...

Recoil - nice audio posts, some serious classics in there, got some goose bumps while sifting...

Ufot-rbot type 1 for mass hysteria

oh... well, I seem to be wrong anyways, because the cha-cha isn't spanish, its cuban, and actually it was an abreviated version of a tribal like dance imported through west african slaves who were brought to cuba...

Ufot-im your spanish dancer, dancer for money, do what your want me to do...

so she spanish dances?

Ufot-so you think you can cha-cha?

ps-personally, though the idea seems "fun", it would be naive to think you can cast this type of footage in some progressive or elevated light... we(kirk6 crew) filmed some of the raves we threw back in the day, and though some of the footage was awesome, some of it was pretty "heavy", needless to say, we never published the footage, it will never be used for anything other than screenshots for pics for our own archives etc... and we never let anyone else film at any of our events. We felt that intimate moments between large amounts of friends are often best left to memory rather than video capture... memories may not last as long, but they cant be shared unless you let them...

jungle brothers ftw~

Ufot-boom-BEEEEM-BOOOM-BEEMBEEM