No, only straight LGTQ groups around here, sorry!

Why bother? The only user was complaining about the speed of the site? Haha

Masturbating.

You sir are an idiot. Look at the names you listed in your previous post. Some are dead, some have dissapeared over 10 years ago.

You haven't died of aids yet?

narc

I think this thread should become a Bill Cosby gif party.

Found a 100$ bill on the floor next to the bar. That was a good night.

well done

haha ah bin si vous aimez ça....

Superb gurn from Wally right there.

This thread needs some boobs

Wasn't there an uber drama thread about this guy before? + 1000 coolness points to whoever finds it!

Might have been on facebook tho

What a cunt

Jesee Savage? is that you?

who are these people?

lies

[ dealextreme.com ]

MDMA is a hell of a drug

I think it's all Dee's fault.

The following are simply some random thoughts that have been rattling about my head of late and that I'd like to let out—a little house cleaning, if you will. Before I launch into my main topic, I want to make a few matters crystal-clear: (1) When one looks at this insecure parade of effete, insolent wackos, one instantly thinks of the word "anthropomorphical", and (2) as a result of that, we have been lied to, distracted, misled, and duped by Dee. Now that you know where I stand on those issues, I can safely say that I wish I didn't have to be the one to break the news that Dee is the pontifex maximus of Maoism. Nevertheless, I cannot afford to pass by anything that may help me make my point. So let me just state that it is our responsibility to ensure that Dee doesn't instill distrust and thereby create a need for her vexatious views. How much more illumination does that fact need before Dee can grasp it? Assuming the answer is "a substantial amount", let me point out that I can say one thing about Dee. She understands better than any of us that psychological impact is paramount—not facts, not anybody's principles, not right and wrong. I'm not suggesting that we behave likewise. I'm suggesting only that you may be wondering why counterproductive schizophrenics latch onto Dee's indiscretions. It's because people of that nature need to have rhetoric and dogma to recite during times of stress in order to cope. That's also why I used to think it would be possible to work out a compromise with Dee. Unfortunately, the terms that she insists upon are so completely unacceptable and so much in contradiction with earlier agreed-upon points that one can conclude only that Dee ought to realize that the most valuable of all talents is that of never using two words when one will do. Unfortunately, she tends to utter so much verbiage about racism that I can conclude only that there are few certainties in life. I have counted only three: death, taxes, and Dee doing some obstreperous thing every few weeks.

Dee's treacheries are not an abstract problem. They have very concrete, immediate, and unpleasant consequences. For instance, I want to unify our community. Dee, in contrast, wants to drive divisive ideological wedges through it.

Often, the lure of an articulate new pundit, a well-financed attention-getting program, an effective audience generator, hot new "inside" information, or a professionally produced exposé is irresistible to pharisaical hypochondriacs who want to unfurl the meddlesome flag of aspheterism. Every time Dee gets caught trying to declare that there's no difference between normal people like you and me and acrasial, unenlightened so-called experts, she promises she'll never do so again. Subsequently, her serfs always jump in and explain that she really shouldn't be blamed even if she does because, as they claim, it is lazy to question her ploys. In the simplest of terms, she claims that her intimations epitomize wholesome family entertainment. I think that the absurdities within that claim speak for themselves although I should add that when people say that bigotry and hate are alive and well, they're right. And Dee is to blame. As a final, parting thought, I assert that we must keep Dee's subalterns at bay. This is a long road and not one for the fainthearted, but if pursued with integrity and conviction it could lead to a world in which people are no longer afraid to empower the oppressed to control their own lives.

So Fuck-you, Dee.

tasteful and superb

I would like to have the redhead maid please! (the young version, of course!)

Dee you're glowing

You have no soul.

Not sure if i'm getting trolled or not.

Ask this guy, apparently he wants to party: [ www.rave.ca ]

1- Non c'est contractuel. Ils ont juste a te faire une facture, c'est pas des employés.

2- Taxes seulement si ils ont des numéros de taxes

3 - Une facture, sinon tu peux pas déduire leurs honoraires de tes revenus et tu paie de l'impot sur de l'argent que t'as jamais reçu.

1 - non
2 - Habituellement les chèques sont fait au nom de l'agent, et l'agent paie les artistes 1 semaine après la fin de chaque mois, avec un rapport.
3 - Tu peu avoir autant de champs d'activités que tu veux, tant que tu fais les modifications à ta déclaration annuelle (ou avec clicséqur)
4 - Idéalement ils devraient s'incorporer, mais c'est cher et tu es imposé 2 fois. Sinon ils devraient s'implement s'enregistrer comme société de personnes.

President sarcasm, thank-you very much!

I think the first thing you should do is seek legal advice from ravers.

Well done!

psytrance.