i'll change my name to blisssss and use an avatar with a smily face getting shot in the eye... that's so much more positive in every way, then i'll ask questions to people and when they answer i'll show them just how stupid they are by enlightening them with "the truth"...

or maybe i can throw a weekly event for the next 10 years than say that i'm the one responsible for the techno movement in montreal, then talk about how un-underground techno is in a topic i created, pointing out that it's repetive even if the entire structure that techno lives on is loop-based. damn, i'm so inteligent.

ohh, and when you reply, i'll keep using term's like "I'LL take you a bit more seriously" like it really matter's what "I" do or think.

i'd still pokem them all night long with my man-handle.

ME, I, I, I , I , ME, ISN't IT ???

This topic is gay. its as if the author started this thread but isnt really interested in anyone's responses. he just wants to show you all his great knowledge...

this thread smells like blissnutz.

and guys, didn't you know that Dj's can't handle critic or comments that are negative ? it's the 11th commandement.. "thow shall not tolerate reality when it hits you in the face" !!

anyways, Axel like's playing that stuff so leave him out of this and get back to bashing Bliss.

Thanks for all the tips everyone. all this talk give's the the urge to, drink rhum for some reason.. too much ableton talk i guess. hehe ..

sweet.

For some reason, i have a feeling that even with 60 minutes of bounced wav files, cuebase wouldn't crash. but it's cool man !! :P

woot woot

isn't that the whole purpose of this site ?? :D

It's "eating drumstick's while fuckin them in the ass", silly.. :p

yeah, i know that's what you mean, but you should specify that your talking about sub-sub genres cause this discussion is based on the term "psytrance" which is very general if you ask me.

what are you trying to say ?? that hardtrance is the same thing as Freeform only slower ? and that they should be called "trance" ??

cause those are the differences i'm talking about that can confuse people with psytrance. some stuff is listed as psytrance but it's more like techtrance. there not even close to sounding the same.

well get used to it cause they all exist !! :)

yeah, i guess, but Vocal house is still nothing compaired to deep house, so it's normal for someone to like 1 but not the other. its the same with Psytrance. :)

"we Interface" is as much psytrance as Adam Bayer.. lol.. The problem with psytrance is the definition of psytrance. there are too many cross-styles stuck under the "logo" psytrance. For Instance, in 2000, there was a more minimal approach that was taken by a few psy artists, making the people think that what they created was psytrance, but it wasn't really psytrance. it was definatly psychadelic music but to call it psytrance when standing next to artists like Infected is kinda contradictory. then, in early 2001, that minimal psy stuff started to grab influences from techno music and became a new cross-bread also known today as "techtrance". so now we have three styles that fall under psytrance, since all three were being played at the same events... In 2006, "infected" type psy took a much darker twist and opened new doors to a new style known as "dark psy" (alot less fluffy than the usual melodic stuff we were used to).. ohh, and before that, i forgot to mention progressive psytrance music (like the older TICON stuff or anything on the label Digital Structures, was also something a little less "infected Mushroom" like, taking a more progressive and deeper edge of things.

it gets very confusing and for people who troll the scene and know nothing about psy, it might get hard to "like" something that has so many different faces.

It's as if we would identify "techno, "electro" and "house" music under the label "techno". it's much easier to get people to respond "i don't like techno" when there are three styles that could be identifed as techno..

euh, kinda confusing, i know.. :)

i caught the first half at work. pretty flawless if you ask me and not to mention the massive tunes. thanks alot mike as this mix made me discover many new artists i haven't had the chance to hear. :)

he's more than a great guy, he's also a great producer. i don't think i need to mention that the opening track of my mix is one of his productions.

FM Radio God's will soon be releasing an EP on Tribal Vision Records in the Chzeck republic. :)

haha.. not this time Fredo. actually, i did this one mix (about 2 years ago) after half a vile went down the drain. It was fucken intense..

i guess you'd have to listen to get the definition right.. hehe :p

why do you have to compare yourself with me? can't stand that someone actually took a listen to your mix and didn't just say "great mix" meaninglessly ? whatever rock's your boat i guess.

i don't, however, go around saying my mixes are flawless or ranting about how many years of Dj'ing in clubs i have.. that's the difference cock boy. you deserved the truth right up your ass to knock you off your little "bliss-cloud". I guess reality hurts. sorry if you got offended. it's funny though, how you do agree that your mix was recorded too loud (i guess you were sick that day and your ear's were blocked so you, blindly, put the gains too loud after all those years of making demo's).. shame on you.

anyhoo, there was obviously no point in reviewing your mix as it's obvious that your own personal rating mean's alot more than anyone else's.

you didn't review my mix, you just commented on the tracks i have in the track list. I don't produce the track's i mix (yet) so if a track has too much bass, it was meant to be that way. BTW, I'll forward your review to the FM RADIO GODS them self. I'm sure you've heard of them before, there from Montreal.. you know Tao Nhan?? well, you bashed the fuck out of his track (I'm sure he'll be pleased to know his productions are worth 0.99$'s to you)

btw, it's a mix, not a race and there isn't a rush to shove 100 tracks into 30 minutes. if you choose tracks that need to be bumped out after the first 1:40 that's your problem.

It's a shame you didn't make it past the first mix though.. at least you caught when the first mix was (4:30), but the second mix you state at 7 mins is still the first mix dick head couldn't you tell be the bassline (which has too much bass for you) kept coming back ?. i do agree it wasn't tight for the entire 3 minute mix. it's hard to maintain good flow during long mixes. i'll be sure to work on that in the future (ohh wait, i did later in that set, you probably got offended after hearing the second mix and refused to put any good comments in there that might make you look "second place" stylez. i understand though, so don't worry. All the renovation's you did at your place above all the doors in to make sure your inflated head get's through easly must have been expensive so i understand again, that you'd want to keep that head of your's as big as possible.

I hope you feel better about yourself now knowing that you can find DJ's as bad as you if you want. there are many more out there, just listen for more than 8 minutes next time.

see you guys at the festival !! i'll be there starting Saturday !

hurray.. :D

yup, you are right Marty.. my bad on that one !! :)

as stated above, all comments are towards this mix and this mix only. i haven't had the unfortunat chance to hear him live yet.. ehhe :p

Hey, its right by my place. i can make it too guys.. then we can go get drunk at my place afterwards with all the band-Pussy around !! :P

so, is your ass bleeding yet ? i was forced to go for a dump after hearing the mix to get all that crap out of my system...

ohh, and another one.

SPAM THE PLANET ::

okay, here's a point-form review of DJ BLISS in the mix ..

Link to mix : ---------> [ www.rave.ca ]

- your opening mix died on you and the attempt to add effects to save it wasn't the most tasteful..
- constant use of fx is overly used.
- Eqing durring mixes is a little sketchy (your increase in mid + high's hurts the ears)
- so far, no real beat to beat mixes, only 4 bar mixes that turn into breakdown mixing
- Very groovy track selection that keeps my foot stomping (and so far, not as vocal as i expected)
- first attempt to beatmatch (at around 7:30 into mix) lead to a slight off-beat (good think for that breakdown huh?)
- more Fx's to cover bad mixing at 13mins into mix.
- shuve that fucken flanger up your ass around 15:45, to cover a mix again.

at 15 minutes into your mix, i get the feeling that you are agressivly shoving tracks into this mix.

17 minutes into the mix, i really love this track, sounds like Extrawelt :) too bad you ruin it with your damn effects and 4 second mix.

- at 20:12 into the mix, we have pleasure to the longest beat-to-beat mix so far, a whopping 15 second mix that kick-muted every third kick until the fading track died and the in-coming track "brokedown"..

- 22:25, we get an uncontrolled trainwreck followed by yourself once again "forcing" the next track into your "mix".. (i was waiting for the flanger on this one)

- ahh, there it is... the flanger is back.

- BTW, that filter you keep using really hurts the ears even if it muffs the bass.

- 25 mins, sick, SICK track here. me likes

- once again, my ears got rapped by you passing the "0" range on your high knob. you should really be careful with that bro.

- 27.19, off-beat and bad transition.

- 31:00: random throw-in of a new track, off structure, durring a rise... can you say, etch-a-sketch ?

- 32:40 - seems like, umm, different that what we are used to, i think its called a mix.. oops, sorry, that was just the track..

- 34:10 : longest beatmatch to date and smoothest transition so far.

- 37:40 : cool, two back to back "half mixes".. first time this mix..

-40:05 : more ear-destroying effects followed by a new tune pasted at the end of the ending track, followed by more intensly high freq's.

43 mins : mix has now been turned off as there is no point in going on. all transitions are remotly done the same way, using abusive flangering to cover for tracks ending before expected.

basically, after 10 years of playing at clubs weekly as stated by this guy in other threads it seems like this is his second demo mix.

i can't even believe that this mix was put up publicly as it will definatly trash his reputation as a dj. This also completes my statement made in that same thread regarding Dj's that mix alot doesn't = talent.

sorry bro, maybe you are used to playing your weekly's at clubs made for def people (which mean's you must be active behind the decks to keep there eye's on you).. i do like your track selection as it wasn't bad at all and the progression of the mix is in order, but please don't flaut that you know how to mix (statement made on this mix, and this mix alone) if that is the way you perform in public. at a club, i would have left after your third transition (given up on the word mix or beatmatch for the sake of honesty towards this mix) ..

ohh, i must have missed this topic.. the name wasn't obvious.

SPAM THE PLANET !!


__

okay, here's a point-form review of his mix (to back-up my example given) heeh.. :P

Link to mix : ---------> [ www.rave.ca ]

- your opening mix died on you and the attempt to add effects to save it wasn't the most tasteful..
- constant use of fx is overly used.
- Eqing durring mixes is a little sketchy (your increase in mid + high's hurts the ears)
- so far, no real beat to beat mixes, only 4 bar mixes that turn into breakdown mixing
- Very groovy track selection that keeps my foot stomping (and so far, not as vocal as i expected)
- first attempt to beatmatch (at around 7:30 into mix) lead to a slight off-beat (good think for that breakdown huh?)
- more Fx's to cover bad mixing at 13mins into mix.
- shuve that fucken flanger up your ass around 15:45, to cover a mix again.

at 15 minutes into your mix, i get the feeling that you are agressivly shoving tracks into this mix.

17 minutes into the mix, i really love this track, sounds like Extrawelt :) too bad you ruin it with your damn effects and 4 second mix.

- at 20:12 into the mix, we have pleasure to the longest beat-to-beat mix so far, a whopping 15 second mix that kick-muted every third kick until the fading track died and the in-coming track "brokedown"..

- 22:25, we get an uncontrolled trainwreck followed by yourself once again "forcing" the next track into your "mix".. (i was waiting for the flanger on this one)

- ahh, there it is... the flanger is back.

- BTW, that filter you keep using really hurts the ears even if it muffs the bass.

- 25 mins, sick, SICK track here. me likes

- once again, my ears got rapped by you passing the "0" range on your high knob. you should really be careful with that bro.

- 27.19, off-beat and bad transition.

- 31:00: random throw-in of a new track, off structure, durring a rise... can you say, etch-a-sketch ?

- 32:40 - seems like, umm, different that what we are used to, i think its called a mix.. oops, sorry, that was just the track..

- 34:10 : longest beatmatch to date and smoothest transition so far.

- 37:40 : cool, two back to back "half mixes".. first time this mix..

-40:05 : more ear-destroying effects followed by a new tune pasted at the end of the ending track, followed by more intensly high freq's.

43 mins : mix has now been turned off as there is no point in going on. all transitions are remotly done the same way, using abusive flangering to cover for tracks ending before expected.

basically, after 10 years of playing at clubs weekly as stated by this guy in other threads it seems like this is his second demo mix.

i can't even believe that this mix was put up publicly as it will definatly trash his reputation as a dj. This also completes my statement made in that same thread regarding Dj's that mix alot doesn't = talent.

sorry bro, maybe you are used to playing your weekly's at clubs made for def people (which mean's you must be active behind the decks to keep there eye's on you).. i do like your track selection as it wasn't bad at all and the progression of the mix is in order, but please don't flaut that you know how to mix (statement made on this mix, and this mix alone) if that is the way you perform in public. at a club, i would have left after your third transition (given up on the word mix or beatmatch for the sake of honesty towards this mix) ..

Yo Antho, pour ton prochain live, je pourrais t'aider a le montez dans Cuebase p-e.. ca te donnerais plus de lousse cote RAM !! :)

bahh, either way, its not going to rain as much as last year.. a little sprinkle never hurt anyone !!

Alex, that's cause your mixes don't need, well, the extra help his do.. ehehehe.. :)

your welcome.. please, take a listen and give your review's so it doesn't look like i'm trying to look better than him or anything, as that's not the case.

okay, here's a point-form review of his mix (to back-up my example given) heeh.. :P

Link to mix : ---------> [ www.rave.ca ]

- your opening mix died on you and the attempt to add effects to save it wasn't the most tasteful..
- constant use of fx is overly used.
- Eqing durring mixes is a little sketchy (your increase in mid + high's hurts the ears)
- so far, no real beat to beat mixes, only 4 bar mixes that turn into breakdown mixing
- Very groovy track selection that keeps my foot stomping (and so far, not as vocal as i expected)
- first attempt to beatmatch (at around 7:30 into mix) lead to a slight off-beat (good think for that breakdown huh?)
- more Fx's to cover bad mixing at 13mins into mix.
- shuve that fucken flanger up your ass around 15:45, to cover a mix again.

at 15 minutes into your mix, i get the feeling that you are agressivly shoving tracks into this mix.

17 minutes into the mix, i really love this track, sounds like Extrawelt :) too bad you ruin it with your damn effects and 4 second mix.

- at 20:12 into the mix, we have pleasure to the longest beat-to-beat mix so far, a whopping 15 second mix that kick-muted every third kick until the fading track died and the in-coming track "brokedown"..

- 22:25, we get an uncontrolled trainwreck followed by yourself once again "forcing" the next track into your "mix".. (i was waiting for the flanger on this one)

- ahh, there it is... the flanger is back.

- BTW, that filter you keep using really hurts the ears even if it muffs the bass.

- 25 mins, sick, SICK track here. me likes

- once again, my ears got rapped by you passing the "0" range on your high knob. you should really be careful with that bro.

- 27.19, off-beat and bad transition.

- 31:00: random throw-in of a new track, off structure, durring a rise... can you say, etch-a-sketch ?

- 32:40 - seems like, umm, different that what we are used to, i think its called a mix.. oops, sorry, that was just the track..

- 34:10 : longest beatmatch to date and smoothest transition so far.

- 37:40 : cool, two back to back "half mixes".. first time this mix..

-40:05 : more ear-destroying effects followed by a new tune pasted at the end of the ending track, followed by more intensly high freq's.

43 mins : mix has now been turned off as there is no point in going on. all transitions are remotly done the same way, using abusive flangering to cover for tracks ending before expected.

basically, after 10 years of playing at clubs weekly as stated by this guy in other threads it seems like this is his second demo mix.

i can't even believe that this mix was put up publicly as it will definatly trash his reputation as a dj. This also completes my statement made in that same thread regarding Dj's that mix alot doesn't = talent.

sorry bro, maybe you are used to playing your weekly's at clubs made for def people (which mean's you must be active behind the decks to keep there eye's on you).. i do like your track selection as it wasn't bad at all and the progression of the mix is in order, but please don't flaut that you know how to mix (statement made on this mix, and this mix alone) if that is the way you perform in public. at a club, i would have left after your third transition (given up on the word mix or beatmatch for the sake of honesty towards this mix) ..

[ www.rave.ca ]

okay, here's a point-form review of your mix

- your opening mix died on you and the attempt to add effects to save it wasn't the most tasteful..
- constant use of fx is overly used.
- Eqing durring mixes is a little sketchy (your increase in mid + high's hurts the ears)
- so far, no real beat to beat mixes, only 4 bar mixes that turn into breakdown mixing
- Very groovy track selection that keeps my foot stomping (and so far, not as vocal as i expected)
- first attempt to beatmatch (at around 7:30 into mix) lead to a slight off-beat (good think for that breakdown huh?)
- more Fx's to cover bad mixing at 13mins into mix.
- shuve that fucken flanger up your ass around 15:45, to cover a mix again.

at 15 minutes into your mix, i get the feeling that you are agressivly shoving tracks into this mix.

17 minutes into the mix, i really love this track, sounds like Extrawelt :) too bad you ruin it with your damn effects and 4 second mix.

- at 20:12 into the mix, we have pleasure to the longest beat-to-beat mix so far, a whopping 15 second mix that kick-muted every third kick until the fading track died and the in-coming track "brokedown"..

- 22:25, we get an uncontrolled trainwreck followed by yourself once again "forcing" the next track into your "mix".. (i was waiting for the flanger on this one)

- ahh, there it is... the flanger is back.

- BTW, that filter you keep using really hurts the ears even if it muffs the bass.

- 25 mins, sick, SICK track here. me likes

- once again, my ears got rapped by you passing the "0" range on your high knob. you should really be careful with that bro.

- 27.19, off-beat and bad transition.

- 31:00: random throw-in of a new track, off structure, durring a rise... can you say, etch-a-sketch ?

- 32:40 - seems like, umm, different that what we are used to, i think its called a mix.. oops, sorry, that was just the track..

- 34:10 : longest beatmatch to date and smoothest transition so far.

- 37:40 : cool, two back to back "half mixes".. first time this mix..

-40:05 : more ear-destroying effects followed by a new tune pasted at the end of the ending track, followed by more intensly high freq's.

43 mins : mix has now been turned off as there is no point in going on. all transitions are remotly done the same way, using abusive flangering to cover for tracks ending before expected.

basically, after 10 years of playing at clubs weekly as stated by this guy in other threads it seems like this is his second demo mix.

i can't even believe that this mix was put up publicly as it will definatly trash his reputation as a dj. This also completes my statement made in that same thread regarding Dj's that mix alot doesn't = talent.

sorry bro, maybe you are used to playing your weekly's at clubs made for def people (which mean's you must be active behind the decks to keep there eye's on you).. i do like your track selection as it wasn't bad at all and the progression of the mix is in order, but please don't flaut that you know how to mix (statement made on this mix, and this mix alone) if that is the way you perform in public. at a club, i would have left after your third transition (given up on the word mix or beatmatch for the sake of honesty towards this mix) ..

i'm downloading and will give my thoughts on the mix ! tracklist looks rather vocalish but i can be wrong.. (keeps fingers crossed)

okay, here's a point-form review of your mix

- your opening mix died on you and the attempt to add effects to save it wasn't the most tasteful..
- constant use of fx is overly used.
- Eqing durring mixes is a little sketchy (your increase in mid + high's hurts the ears)
- so far, no real beat to beat mixes, only 4 bar mixes that turn into breakdown mixing
- Very groovy track selection that keeps my foot stomping (and so far, not as vocal as i expected)
- first attempt to beatmatch (at around 7:30 into mix) lead to a slight off-beat (good think for that breakdown huh?)
- more Fx's to cover bad mixing at 13mins into mix.
- shuve that fucken flanger up your ass around 15:45, to cover a mix again.

at 15 minutes into your mix, i get the feeling that you are agressivly shoving tracks into this mix.

17 minutes into the mix, i really love this track, sounds like Extrawelt :) too bad you ruin it with your damn effects and 4 second mix.

- at 20:12 into the mix, we have pleasure to the longest beat-to-beat mix so far, a whopping 15 second mix that kick-muted every third kick until the fading track died and the in-coming track "brokedown"..

- 22:25, we get an uncontrolled trainwreck followed by yourself once again "forcing" the next track into your "mix".. (i was waiting for the flanger on this one)

- ahh, there it is... the flanger is back.

- BTW, that filter you keep using really hurts the ears even if it muffs the bass.

- 25 mins, sick, SICK track here. me likes

- once again, my ears got rapped by you passing the "0" range on your high knob. you should really be careful with that bro.

- 27.19, off-beat and bad transition.

- 31:00: random throw-in of a new track, off structure, durring a rise... can you say, etch-a-sketch ?

- 32:40 - seems like, umm, different that what we are used to, i think its called a mix.. oops, sorry, that was just the track..

- 34:10 : longest beatmatch to date and smoothest transition so far.

- 37:40 : cool, two back to back "half mixes".. first time this mix..

-40:05 : more ear-destroying effects followed by a new tune pasted at the end of the ending track, followed by more intensly high freq's.

43 mins : mix has now been turned off as there is no point in going on. all transitions are remotly done the same way, using abusive flangering to cover for tracks ending before expected.

basically, after 10 years of playing at clubs weekly as stated by this guy in other threads it seems like this is his second demo mix.

i can't even believe that this mix was put up publicly as it will definatly trash his reputation as a dj. This also completes my statement made in that same thread regarding Dj's that mix alot doesn't = talent.

sorry bro, maybe you are used to playing your weekly's at clubs made for def people (which mean's you must be active behind the decks to keep there eye's on you).. i do like your track selection as it wasn't bad at all and the progression of the mix is in order, but please don't flaut that you know how to mix (statement made on this mix, and this mix alone) if that is the way you perform in public. at a club, i would have left after your third transition (given up on the word mix or beatmatch for the sake of honesty towards this mix) ..

nope.. the scene is more tech oriented these days

i touched ian's mixer back in 2002..

its nutz.. he even has the balls to put his website in this thread.

yeah, it was fixed not long after ! :) thx noah