Djing Breaks Looks So Boring.
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» nothingnopenope replied on Tue Feb 10, 2004 @ 12:07am |
 Coolness: 201950 | Ian's sets are smooth as butter.. I'd rather that than someone spinning a record backwards and screaming "REWIND SELECTA!"... Anyway prog house and trance tracks don't sound very good when you chop them up into bits with faders ussually.. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» neoform replied on Tue Feb 10, 2004 @ 12:38am |
 Coolness: 340390 | i suppose if i was doing techno, the more the better, but i don't have 4 decks, and i'm not so much into techno anyway.. beh. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Bunnytronix replied on Tue Feb 10, 2004 @ 12:50am |
 Coolness: 153235 | I get. yeah. So prog house just spins itself from intro to outro? |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» nothingnopenope replied on Tue Feb 10, 2004 @ 12:58am |
| Coolness: 201950 | yeah you have to mess it up with techno and a lot of DnB because the tracks tend to be very repetitious |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» neoform replied on Tue Feb 10, 2004 @ 1:03am |
| Coolness: 340390 | i wouldn't say from intro to outro.. thats what a lot of club DJs that spin prog do, they wait untill the last 30 seconds of a 10 minute track to start introing a new track.. VERY lazy.
i start mixing at about 2-3 before the end of a track. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Bunnytronix replied on Tue Feb 10, 2004 @ 1:09am |
| Coolness: 153235 | So you lose all the intro elements that sound COOOL |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» neoform replied on Tue Feb 10, 2004 @ 1:20am |
| Coolness: 340390 | ..... you mean a flat/dead beat? oh for sure. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» nothingnopenope replied on Tue Feb 10, 2004 @ 1:28am |
| Coolness: 201950 | hahah yeah |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Bunnytronix replied on Tue Feb 10, 2004 @ 1:36am |
| Coolness: 153235 | But .. but .. all those magical moments ... of twirling music and stellar maniacal building up.. all that steam.. that, firery...sweaty.. gay... fucking buildups man...
what about them?.. you don't like them? Stereo needs to die. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Toltech replied on Tue Feb 10, 2004 @ 2:20am |
 Coolness: 146145 | yeah well that's prog for you....that's why Techno is so repetitive...it's meant to be tweaked and most changes are ment to be brought in by the dj....in other words music thought of for djs (most probably by djs...I'm just guessing :b)....that's how this music started.....loops loops loops.....then came the whole "let's make a songs, not tracks" thing....
I aint dissing, I'm just stating but it still makes me laugh when people listen to techno tracks individualy and go "it's too repetitive"......yeah hi... |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Toltech replied on Tue Feb 10, 2004 @ 2:24am |
| Coolness: 146145 | by the way...that link only buffers and never shows me anything... |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Bunnytronix replied on Tue Feb 10, 2004 @ 2:27am |
| Coolness: 153235 | Oh man. even Carlos thinks I wanted to get educated.
Screw the link! It's fucking boring... the guy just stands there for an hour. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» eLDee replied on Tue Feb 10, 2004 @ 9:36am |
 Coolness: 121640 | it's all about speed mixing |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Toltech replied on Tue Feb 10, 2004 @ 10:57am |
| Coolness: 146145 | I wasn't educating you.....I wasn't posting this for you.....that link doesn't show me anything anyways so I gotta post something....it just buffers and it doesn't go over 0%...so I got bored.... |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Bunnytronix replied on Tue Feb 10, 2004 @ 3:41pm |
| Coolness: 153235 | It's all about the foot tapping |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» neoform replied on Wed Feb 11, 2004 @ 12:29am |
| Coolness: 340390 | Speed mixing would be a lot more fun on CD players if there was a faster way to cue tracks..
thats the one advantage i've noticed vinyl djs have over cd djs.. those bastards. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» eLDee replied on Wed Feb 11, 2004 @ 9:05am |
| Coolness: 121640 | How hard is it to beatmatch 2 90-120 BPM tracks??
Even on a cd, c'mon man put yourself into it instead of wasting time on the net |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» PitaGore replied on Wed Feb 11, 2004 @ 11:11am |
 Coolness: 472530 | I want cdj's at home dammit
Also i personnally prefer progressive-long-tight mixes over the speed mixing most of the time .. But depending on what i play , for sure ... Sometimes speed mixing is proper, especially with hiphop remixes, ragga choons or tracks made with punched tracks Me too i'd love to spend more time on the decks than on internet .. But i'm workin dammit |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Bunnytronix replied on Wed Feb 11, 2004 @ 12:22pm |
| Coolness: 153235 | Speed mixing can be done with long progressions too... I mean like: Time it to be break down to Bash time. And fuck around with it on it's progression. I don't know if that makes senses for Prog House though. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» neoform replied on Wed Feb 11, 2004 @ 10:29pm |
| Coolness: 340390 | Originally posted by FLECKALICIOUS...
How hard is it to beatmatch 2 90-120 BPM tracks?? Even on a cd, c'mon man put yourself into it instead of wasting time on the net beatmatching on cds takes me less than 15 seconds, i was talking about cueing the track at the first beat of the track.. finding it on cd takes time cause you can't see the music like you can see on a record.. takes longer on cd.. |
Djing Breaks Looks So Boring.
[ Top Of Page ] |
Post A Reply |
You must be logged in to post a reply.
[ Top Of Page ] |
