| Page: 1 2 | Rating: Unrated [0] |
Should Music Be Free?
|
 Coolness: 340355
| heh, i'd prefer to cost little and play at a lot of places then cost a lot and play little.. |
|
 Coolness: 134300
| people say music should be free? then how would artists survive. maybe what you mean is music shouldn't be so damn expensive. people resorted to downloading off of napster because cd's are so expensive in comparison to how much it costs to make one. as for vinyl, it is expensive to put music on records so i guess the price is appropriate |
|
 Coolness: 686280
| yeah, CDs should cost 2$ for singles and 6-7$ for a full album. I'm sick of buying 19.99$ coasters. |
|
Coolness: 340355
| and you should be able to rip em to mp3......
(unlike what the riaa has in mind) |
|
 Coolness: 300015
| GIVE MONEY TO SCOTTY OR THE GAY RABBIT WILL HAVE YOUR SOUL |
|
 Coolness: 92380
| In responce to the idea that if music was free to listen to artists wouldn't survive...
music has been made for thousands of years, and recording music and selling it is relatively new. Artists obviously can and did survive without relying on selling recorded music, by making money off performances. I think today we have too much emphasis on recorded music and not enough on live music. Any music lover would gladly pay to see live music because its simply a comepletely different experience than recorded music. So really I hope that the future of the music industry is listening to whatever you like for free on the net, then going to see the music u like live. |
|
 Coolness: 201915
| Well if I could spend all my time making music and make a living from it the music would be a hell of alot better. |
Should Music Be Free?
You must be logged in to post a reply.
