| Page: 1 | Rating: Unrated [0] |
Matrix Revolutions Trailor
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» neoform replied on Thu Aug 21, 2003 @ 2:44am |
 Coolness: 340365 | [ www.openimg.org ]
i managed to grab a copy with my server.. took way to long downloading it on my comp at 2k/sec (server got it at 400k/sec) enjoy! :)` |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Screwhead replied on Thu Aug 21, 2003 @ 2:51am |
 Coolness: 686290 | Wicked! 241k/s down from your server. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» neoform replied on Thu Aug 21, 2003 @ 2:53am |
| Coolness: 340365 | damn.. i'm only getting 51k/sec from it! daaaaaamn you ISP! *curses own isp* since other are getting better speed from my own freakin server! |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» neoform replied on Thu Aug 21, 2003 @ 2:58am |
| Coolness: 340365 | damn, i wanna see the movie now..
trinity does the run up the wall and sideays flip thingy again! |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» neoform replied on Thu Aug 21, 2003 @ 3:47am |
| Coolness: 340365 | aaaaahahahahahahahahahahah
i was reading some of the replies on [ slashdot.org ] holy shit are they fucking nerds!!! " I agree that the graphics looked bad in the burly brawl. My explanation: the Matrix itself is getting overloaded when 100 Smith's show up and need to be rendered. When the Matrix renders 100 people in a normal crowd, those 100 people have 100 brains that can be tapped for distributed rendering. But when it renders 100 clones of Smith, there's a bottleneck." geez, they always gotta come up with some lameass explination for lazy CG effects workers.. the bad CG had little-nothing to do with the storyline.. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Nuclear replied on Thu Aug 21, 2003 @ 4:03am |
 Coolness: 2749615 | 201k/sec probably cause it's a windows server ;) |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» OMGSTFUDIEPLZKTX replied on Thu Aug 21, 2003 @ 7:39am |
 Coolness: 67215 | hahahahaha DJneoform
I never thought about it like that. However, I'm pretty sure that when matrix got developed, that probable situations were determined first in order to have contingency plans, including extra processing power. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» neoform replied on Thu Aug 21, 2003 @ 12:03pm |
| Coolness: 340365 | 201k/sec?
no, i went to dawson and did some download tests, i got 550k/sec download just like i did on my linux server.. the sustained download speeds are identical on windows and linux.. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Nuclear replied on Thu Aug 21, 2003 @ 12:49pm |
| Coolness: 2749615 | 370k/sec from the linux one... |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» neoform replied on Fri Aug 22, 2003 @ 1:59pm |
| Coolness: 340365 | huh? |
Matrix Revolutions Trailor
| Page: 1 |
[ Top Of Page ] |
Post A Reply |
You must be logged in to post a reply.
[ Top Of Page ] |
