Fruity Talks...
|
 Coolness: 165515
| |
|
 Coolness: 201940
| wow, it makes sense that fruityloops came from a GAME DEVELOPER and not someone with musical backround |
|
 Coolness: 300040
| haha so true |
|
 Coolness: 86400
| :lol BURN!!! |
|
 Coolness: 67230
| Pulse had no musical experience either, yet he created Impulse Tracker :) |
|
Coolness: 165515
| music doesnt come from your background... but your heart !
:D |
|
 Coolness: 686305
| As corny as it sounds, I totally agree.
Also, just because people are too lazy/elitist to figgure out how a program works doesn't make it shit. |
|
 Coolness: 174805
| Are people saying fruity is shit?
Some of the samples are nice. Simple interface...not the best money can buy, but it's fun. |
|
Coolness: 686305
| Eww, the default samples sound like butt! But interface and use are great. User-friendly without making it a "For Dummies" program. |
|
Coolness: 201940
| Dood the guy said cubase was "hard", he said his biggest influence was rebirth.
It all makes sense now.
Fruity is a great game though, I must say. |
|
Coolness: 86400
| I'll say, It's kinda like tetris~ |
|
Coolness: 61555
| Fruityloops is just a tool.
it is upto you to make the best of it.
Who cares if it wasnt programmed by Michel Jackson. |
|
Coolness: 201940
| if it were the logo would be a hanging baby |
|
Coolness: 67230
| Fruity Loops has some of the best sound quality out of all programs, second only to Jeskola XS-2 |
|
Coolness: 86400
| Not that it concerns me, cuz i'm a mac guy, but are you talking just the new fruity loops, or fruity loops 3 and under as well?
I never tried the new one, but 3 and under have poor sound mixing/enginearing abilities~ 95% of songs I've heard people make in fruity sounds like cardboard~ in my opinion. . . |
|
Coolness: 300040
| i wil have to agree on that |
|
Coolness: 201940
| am I death: yeah and jeskola is the guy who wrote buzz :-) |
|
Coolness: 67230
| A lot of people aren't patient enough to export thier songs using the Sync 256 export, and the hermite curve antialiases a lot compared to Sync 256. However, Sync 256 is almost 100% accurate with almost absolutely no antialiasing whatsoever.
Fruity Loops 3 and above had Sync 256.
One thing though is that Fruity Loops as a realtime sampler is not great. But when exporting, it sounds 99.9999% perfect.
And the test that Jeskola did was using 3.56 I believe. |
|
Coolness: 201940
| yeah and his realtime sampler beat it in quality |
|
Coolness: 67230
| so?
his realtime sampler probally crashes every 2 seconds if Buzz is any testament to Jeskola's ability. At least fruity loops is stable enough to last longer than 1 hour, overloaded with plugins, and not crash. |
Fruity Talks...
You must be logged in to post a reply.
