26 Mars - Mon Choix!
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Mr_Frog replied on Tue Mar 13, 2007 @ 4:37pm |
no, at the last provincial election, they didn't even got 1% of the vote almost 17 000 votes:
[ fr.wikipedia.org ] [ fr.wikipedia.org ] Update » Mr_Frog wrote on Tue Mar 13, 2007 @ 4:44pm I think you are talking about the Green Party of Canada:
[ fr.wikipedia.org ] But there was no PQ in that election! | |
I'm feeling the ipod generation right now.. |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» tranceinmypants replied on Tue Mar 13, 2007 @ 5:30pm |
right yes, i meant the bloc quebecois, and the last Federal election (shouldve specified), but in both cases they get funding for each vote and ED's can be tilted to favour entrenched parties, its a good idea to show em the tides turning.. | |
I'm feeling no limits, only laws right now.. |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Holly_Golightly replied on Tue Mar 13, 2007 @ 5:47pm |
je suis contente de constater qu'il y a encore des jeunes qui s'interesse a la politique au quebec... on est loin des annees 60 mais quand meme! :)
moi en attendant d'avoir un "nouveau pays" ou voter et bien je vais suivre les elections aux quebec... quoique je commence a perdre le fil... je devrais lire plus de trucs venant du quebec.. quelqu'un a un bon site pour des nouvelles du quebec??? (et je vais passer pour tt ce qui est de quebecor..hehe) :P je suis encore surprise par la derniere election federale...j'aurais jamais cru qu'un politicien qui n'est pas originaire du quebec se fasse elire!! je crois que c'est la premiere fois ds l'histoire du canada que ca arrive! 0_o | |
I'm feeling hitched right now.. |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» tranceinmypants replied on Tue Mar 13, 2007 @ 6:39pm |
Originally Posted By MOONDANCER
hmm.. mine was pretty evenly mixed up.. 33% green, 33% action democtratique, 25% liberal and 25% parti quebecois, 18% quebec solidaire. How enlightening. just out of curiosity 33 + 33+ 25 + 25+ 18 = 134% ? =) | |
I'm feeling no limits, only laws right now.. |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» AYkiN0XiA replied on Tue Mar 13, 2007 @ 6:57pm |
je crois que c'est pas le tout qui est un pourcentage, mais plus a combien pourcent on est d'accord avec leur programme. | |
I'm feeling music! right now.. |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» cvxn replied on Tue Mar 13, 2007 @ 7:27pm |
78% Vert
50% PQ 27% QS 8% ADQ 0% Libéral (lol) Mais je savais que j'allais voter Vert anyways, ça fitte avec mes valeurs ;) | |
I'm feeling the dancing void right now.. |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Amp_Up replied on Wed Mar 14, 2007 @ 9:19am |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Mr_Frog replied on Wed Mar 14, 2007 @ 10:45am |
moi moi moi!
je crois que c'est Boisclair qui s'est démarqué des autres. Charest a été sur la défensive jusqu'au 3/4 du débat avant de se mettre a attaquer surtout Dumont. Durant le premier 3/4, il ne répondait a aucune question/accusation des 2 autres, en répondant uniquement par les plus de son bilan pas reluisant et a en remettant, même après 4 ans, la faute sur les autres. Dumont a commencé en lion, très fort, mais très déstabilisé sur le côté économie (pas de chiffres) et côté autonomiste (comme boisclair a dit, pour modifier la constitution, ca prend l'unanimité des députés et du sénat a Ottawa, chose quasi-impossible). Pis son abolition des commissions scolaire, y s'est fait vargé dedans, et avec raison, ça pas de sens. Dumont a été cassé solide sur l'économie par Boisclair: "Vous êtes économistes de métiers? Où sont les chiffres? Qu'elles est la marge de manoeuvre? Savez-vous ce que s'est la marge de manoeuvre?" (genre, t'es tu incompétant en économie ou quoi?) Boisclair a été plutôt molo au début, mais s'est permis de devenir de plus en plus agressif, p-e un peu trop a vouloir trop couper la parole. Un peu maladroit côté environnement, mais le reste, surtout économie et status du Québec dans le Canada, très fort. Il s'est permis de casser ses adversaire plusieurs fois sans trop être déstabilisé. Et Boislcair s'adressait non pas aux fédéralistes convaincus, mais a la base souverainiste, au 45% de souverainistes convaincus qui existent en tout temps et qui ne savent pas s'ils vont voter PQ, d'où le fait qu'il n'avait pas peur, dès le début, de dire qu'il allait tenir un référendum. Il n'a rien a convaincre aux fédéralistes, mais plus aux souverainistes de revenir chez eux, et il a bien fait son travail selon moi. Y'a pas de perdant selon moi, mais Boisclair s'est démarqué pour l'ensemble du débat. | |
I'm feeling the ipod generation right now.. |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Amp_Up replied on Wed Mar 14, 2007 @ 11:11am |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» neoform replied on Wed Mar 14, 2007 @ 11:27am |
I'm surprised that so many people vote in the provincial elections.. | |
I'm feeling you up right now.. |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Mr_Frog replied on Wed Mar 14, 2007 @ 11:37am |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» AlienZeD replied on Wed Mar 14, 2007 @ 11:40am |
voting is really important, I believe you should be forced to vote, or get the fuck out! | |
I'm feeling 100% off right now.. |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» flo replied on Wed Mar 14, 2007 @ 1:00pm |
Originally Posted By ALIENZED
voting is really important, I believe you should be forced to vote, or get the fuck out! moreover it's the only difference between canadian permanent residents (like many people from all over the world, like i'll probably be soon) and canadian citizens : citizens are allowed to vote. | |
I'm feeling phd powa !!! right now.. |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» clown replied on Wed Mar 14, 2007 @ 1:01pm |
i watched the debat as well.. I think that Dumont is the one who really wants to change things without totally changing our lifestyles. Yeah, he didn't have any "numbers".. but is that really important ?? and did you see the stupid questions Boisclair was asking Dumont to answer?? it was specific situations that will not really reflect on how someone will govern a province.
Charest was very smooth throughout the whole night but was laughted at by Dumont a few times. Boisclair looses his temper too often and i think just that is a negative characteristic that can cause him to make wrong decisions in the future. Dumont was strong and while listening to him, he inspires confidence and acknowledges that facts that a change must be made. It was a rather boring show !! | |
I'm feeling beckers @ rewire 3 right now.. |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» El_Presidente replied on Wed Mar 14, 2007 @ 1:06pm |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» clown replied on Wed Mar 14, 2007 @ 1:13pm |
unfortunatly, it wasn't one of the topics :( Update » clown wrote on Wed Mar 14, 2007 @ 1:13pm They didn't mention anything about smoking, drinking or drug use either.. | |
I'm feeling beckers @ rewire 3 right now.. |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Amp_Up replied on Wed Mar 14, 2007 @ 1:15pm |
Originally Posted By CLOWN YEAH, HE DIDN'T HAVE ANY "NUMBERS".. BUT IS THAT REALLY IMPORTANT ??
Yeah! What's the point in throwing numbers if you can't back them the day after the election. Originally Posted By clown It was a rather boring show !! --> should have watch the hockey game man!
I think these debats are not only boring but pretty much useless, unless you're not totally convinced of your vote. I zap to the debat for 4-5 mins tho and i came to that conclusion: [ www.tropheevezina.com ] | |
I'm feeling fired up right now.. |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» metal_user replied on Wed Mar 14, 2007 @ 3:04pm |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Holly_Golightly replied on Wed Mar 14, 2007 @ 7:38pm |
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» cvxn replied on Thu Mar 15, 2007 @ 10:58am |
Brun, ça veut dire que t'hésite entre les Libéraux (rouge) pis le Parti Vert (vert)? | |
I'm feeling the dancing void right now.. |
26 Mars - Mon Choix!
[ Top Of Page ] |
Post A Reply |
You must be logged in to post a reply.
[ Top Of Page ] |