Rave Radio: Offline (0/0)
Email: Password:
Page: 1Rating: Unrated [0]
Karin Marks'S Disdainfulness
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» m4xom4x replied on Mon Dec 11, 2006 @ 11:15am
m4xom4x
Coolness: 45010
Westmount's felled trees trigger anger

ALAN HUSTAK, The Gazette
Published: Monday, December 11, 2006

The trees are gone, but environmentalists continue to bark.

Westmount's decision to clear cut more than 120 trees and bushes in Sunnyside Park is expected to be questioned by representatives of Save The Park! Sauvons le parc! and other concerned citizens at tonight's city council meeting.

Trees that brushed seven to 18 metres high against the lookout in the park below Summit Circle were felled by the public works department about two weeks ago.

One of the trees was at least 100 years old.

"We respect trees, but a park is a park, not a forest," Westmount Mayor Karin Marks said last week.

"Sunnyside Park was designed in 1931 as a park with trees, benches, walkways and with 20 markers pointing out scenic vistas. Over the years the trees have self-seeded. They grew very tall, very skinny and blocked the views. The larger trees had serious rot and any tree that is dangerous comes down immediately,'' Marks said.

"We do not want the park to become an urban forest like Summit Park is. We're investing money to redo the site as a park," she added.

That doesn't satisfy environmentalists like Gabrielle Korn, a spokesperson for Les amis de la montagne, an organization that works to conserve and enhance Mount Royal's green spaces.

"It's a shame there had not been an ongoing maintenance in the park and the situation was allowed to deteriorate," Korn said.

"It was a mix. Some trees were healthy, some were dead, and because we can't go back in time, clear cutting is a very dramatic, very drastic move.

If pruning had been done on a three-to-five-year basis, the sight lines would have remained open and the integrity of the park maintained, Korn added.

''Under the circumstances, it was the only measure that could be taken," Korn said.

Patrick Barnard, a member of the National Association for Olmsted Parks, another conservation group, opposes the clear cutting and plans to raise questions at tonight's meeting.

"This was vintage green space that was neglected by the city of Westmount and by the city of Montreal," Barnard said.

"The major issue that cannot be brushed away is that if you see trees as a liability, you get rid of them. Trees are not a liability. Only two of those trees were dead.

"Those woods survived the ice storm. They were not lousy trees. After they were cut down, between 30 to 50 cords of wood were taken away. The wood was good. You cannot sell rotten cords of wood," Barnard said.

Others in the exclusive neighbourhood have complained that the park had become dangerous at night, attracting undesirable elements. To protect their security, the trees had to be cleared, area residents said.

"It is one of those projects that looks rough now, but wait until the tree-planting is finished. It will look amazing," said Bruce St. Louis, Westmount's general manager. In the spring, we will be replanting trees that won't grow as high, but will attract birds, he said.

"Many of the larger trees were not healthy and could not be pruned. They were in rough shape and had to come down.

''The final landscaping plan will allow us to preserve the wooded area below the belvedere as a park, keep the mature, healthy trees, and open up the views," St. Louis said.

Source: The Montreal Gazette
I'm feeling <)))>< ($_$) ><(((> right now..
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» cinderella_soul replied on Tue Dec 12, 2006 @ 7:33am
cinderella_soul
Coolness: 56915
well, hopefully that will be a lesson learned and applied to other developing areas. People need to enlargen their scope of thinking, broaden it to not only consider themselves or themselves and their neighborhood but to think of life as a whole.
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Morphine replied on Tue Dec 12, 2006 @ 9:41am
morphine
Coolness: 51685
enlargen eh?
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» cinderella_soul replied on Tue Dec 12, 2006 @ 6:38pm
cinderella_soul
Coolness: 56915
yes, enlargen. wanna have sex...

looks like we are doomed..lol.

do you find the word enlargen does not seem to fit semantically?
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Morphine replied on Tue Dec 12, 2006 @ 7:59pm
morphine
Coolness: 51685
well considering it's a made-up word..........
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» cinderella_soul replied on Wed Dec 13, 2006 @ 7:14am
cinderella_soul
Coolness: 56915
look it up into the dictionary, I did, after you made your comment to refresh my memory on it meaning.. to check.
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Morphine replied on Wed Dec 13, 2006 @ 10:44am
morphine
Coolness: 51685
merriam-webster: enlargen: The word you've entered isn't in the dictionary.

------

google: Web
No definitions were found for enlargen.

--------

[ dictionary.reference.com ] :
No results found for enlargen.

-----------

[ thefreedictionary.com ] enlargen
Word not found in the Dictionary and Encyclopedia.

-----------

[ www.onelook.com ] Sorry, no dictionaries indexed in the selected category contain the word enlargen.

-----------

[ wordreference.com ] enlargen:
We found no entry in the English Dictionary.
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» moondancer replied on Wed Dec 13, 2006 @ 11:11am
moondancer
Coolness: 92980
The correct word is 'enlarge'. Enlarge is already the verb for large but instead you treated it as a noun that needed a verb form.

Ex:

Incorrect:
Click here to enlargen the image.

Correct:
Click here to enlarge the image.
I'm feeling long gone right now..
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Mike_Stinger replied on Wed Dec 13, 2006 @ 1:07pm
mike_stinger
Coolness: 51955
she meant "embiggen"
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Morphine replied on Wed Dec 13, 2006 @ 2:59pm
morphine
Coolness: 51685
ahahahahhaa i was just thinking:

"a noble spirit embiggens the smallest man."

jebediah springfield
Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» cinderella_soul replied on Wed Dec 13, 2006 @ 6:41pm
cinderella_soul
Coolness: 56915
yeah, you are both correct. I thought I saw enlargen in the dict. but it really was enlarge. I appreciate the corrections: the help.
Karin Marks'S Disdainfulness
Page: 1
Post A Reply
You must be logged in to post a reply.