Polyamory
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» earthyspirit replied on Sun Jul 24, 2005 @ 3:35am |
 Coolness: 230585 | It's been a while I've been trying to wrap my head around attitudes and practices within the scope of "dating" at parties and raves. I've had in my mind that we're all stuck within the bounds of societal self doubt. We, many of us, approach things with an idea of how "these things" work and in doing so, limit ourselves in that we create our own barriers unwittingly..
I'd been thinking about my relationships a bit tonight and came across a the word polyamorous so I dug for more info, it interested me and I thought I'd share it with you. I believe Polyamory suits me just fine. Reference urls [ www.faqs.org ] [ www.hopesplace.net ] I've, like I said, until now had a difficult time wrapping my head around the idea of polyamory, never heard of it. Lovely word, much better conversation than boyfriends. ^_- mwaha |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Nuclear replied on Sun Jul 24, 2005 @ 10:11pm |
 Coolness: 2750385 | I agree... I guess you never been with two girls before and would like to try it out ;) |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» nothingnopenope replied on Sun Jul 24, 2005 @ 10:56pm |
 Coolness: 202135 | interesting in theory... doesn't work out well in practice |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» basdini replied on Sun Jul 24, 2005 @ 11:54pm |
 Coolness: 146110 | polyamory is just society transcending past artificial set limits on things like so-called 'morality'
ie it's indecent to be with more than one person at once. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» nothingnopenope replied on Sun Jul 24, 2005 @ 11:56pm |
| Coolness: 202135 | maybe one day we will transcend "morality" even more and make killing whoever you want legal.... |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» v.2-1 replied on Mon Jul 25, 2005 @ 12:00am |
 Coolness: 160030 | Maybe one day we will transcend " stupidity " even more and make our roads a shitload less congested. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Zz.ee.vV replied on Mon Jul 25, 2005 @ 1:21am |
 Coolness: 194935 | Originally posted by SCOTTYP...
interesting in theory... doesn't work out well in practice just because it doesnt for you, or for someone you know, doesnt mean thats the general consensus it actually works quite well for many who i know personally. i've always said its much better to be up front an honest than cheat or pretend there is a "relationship" for couple weeks then move on |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Plan-C replied on Mon Jul 25, 2005 @ 11:30am |
 Coolness: 63500 | One day my penis will be big enough for me to share it with more than one person
err... i mean one day I'll be confident enough to share my penis with more than one person... wait. no. i mean one day i'll be self-actualized enough to share myself with more than one person. actually.... what i think i mean is... orgy! who's in? nah but seriously, makes perfect sense but as ScottyP pointed out, i think its difficult to put into practice. All persons involved had really better be damn well self-actualized before jumping in or they're gonna get hurt. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» nothingnopenope replied on Mon Jul 25, 2005 @ 2:35pm |
| Coolness: 202135 | I think if everyone in the world was a sociopath, it would work out great. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Bassic replied on Mon Jul 25, 2005 @ 2:41pm |
 Coolness: 129605 | Jelousy is something deeply seeded inside us, some more than others. But I beleive it is the biggest thing preventing people from having polyamourous relationships. One person always gets a little jelous at some point and it fucks things up.
Threesomes in my opinion don't always constitute polyamory. I think polyamory is a more involved relationship with 2 boy/girlfriends that don't nessesarily have to love or actually even know eachother, but it is usally only ethical if they know of eachother. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» basdini replied on Tue Jul 26, 2005 @ 2:40pm |
| Coolness: 146110 | monogamy is just a left over from archaic christian morality... |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» neoform replied on Tue Jul 26, 2005 @ 2:50pm |
 Coolness: 340575 | Polyamory is just the early stages of polygamy, which isn't the same as having sex with multiple people.. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Plan-C replied on Tue Jul 26, 2005 @ 3:03pm |
| Coolness: 63500 | i think polygamy revolves more around the concept that men should have multiple wives because men are always able to ... further the reproductive process whereas when a women is pregnant she is incaple of further conception until after birth. to my knowledge polygamy came into practice as a method to increase the size of the family, and consequently the economic productive function of the family thus furthering the wealth of the [man] at the head of the family to greater success in society. polyamory explicitly states the concept of "love" at its forefront. polygamy more often than not has little to do with love and more to do with function. Although i'm sure that feelings (however strong they are) are implicit before one decides to marry his/her 6th wife/husband. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» little_sarah replied on Tue Jul 26, 2005 @ 3:34pm |
 Coolness: 122350 | once again. men are pigs. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Mico replied on Tue Jul 26, 2005 @ 3:36pm |
 Coolness: 151370 | pfft
Your just in denial that you Love us and can't live without us. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» little_sarah replied on Tue Jul 26, 2005 @ 3:38pm |
| Coolness: 122350 | i most definately can |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» basdini replied on Tue Jul 26, 2005 @ 3:40pm |
| Coolness: 146110 | she'll become a lesbian just to spite you |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Bassic replied on Tue Jul 26, 2005 @ 3:41pm |
| Coolness: 129605 | Carpet Muchers are cool! :) |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» neoform replied on Tue Jul 26, 2005 @ 7:05pm |
| Coolness: 340575 | nah, sarah's never gonna be able to live without a man, who will pay the bills? |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Mico replied on Tue Jul 26, 2005 @ 10:29pm |
| Coolness: 151370 | OHHH!!
:lol |
Polyamory
[ Top Of Page ] |
Post A Reply |
You must be logged in to post a reply.
[ Top Of Page ] |
