Riddles
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» regimental911 replied on Wed May 25, 2005 @ 1:21pm |
 Coolness: 135195 | Originally posted by OUU! ROMANTIQUE!...
men are like the numbnuts they are portrayed as on the tele. we play dumb ,so you guy's have the illusion of control. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» AlienZeD replied on Wed May 25, 2005 @ 2:16pm |
 Coolness: 510485 | Originally posted by REGIMENTAL911...
Originally posted by ouu! romantique!...
men are like the numbnuts they are portrayed as on the tele. we play dumb ,so you guy's have the illusion of control. This WHOLE time I thought 'oooo! romantique!' was a guy. Profile says otherwise though. wow |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» regimental911 replied on Wed May 25, 2005 @ 2:25pm |
| Coolness: 135195 | she does have a cock though man,bigger than all of our. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» cactain_steef replied on Wed May 25, 2005 @ 2:32pm |
 Coolness: 155600 | hahahaha.
yeah, my penal shaft is larger than the entire populace of ravewave. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» cactain_steef replied on Wed May 25, 2005 @ 2:36pm |
| Coolness: 155600 | ps. if i was a guy, id tooootally be gay. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» neoform replied on Wed May 25, 2005 @ 2:39pm |
 Coolness: 340590 | if i was the chick i wouldn't leave my room ever. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» AlienZeD replied on Wed May 25, 2005 @ 2:58pm |
| Coolness: 510485 | sure you would! to buy a dildo.
Besides don't give them ideas because if you were really a girl, you'd find a man and sit on him. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» michaeldino replied on Wed May 25, 2005 @ 11:48pm |
 Coolness: 69900 | Originally posted by LOX...
What is the next number in the series: 4, 9, 61, 52, 63, 94, 46, 18 1 |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» michaeldino replied on Wed May 25, 2005 @ 11:49pm |
| Coolness: 69900 | Originally posted by MOONDANCER...
no you're confused, they did pay 9$ they didnt get 5$ back, they got 3$ back no... im really not confused |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» michaeldino replied on Wed May 25, 2005 @ 11:52pm |
| Coolness: 69900 | Originally posted by DINOSAUR...
Originally posted by LoX...
What is the next number in the series: 4, 9, 61, 52, 63, 94, 46, 18 1 or 001 if you wanna get technical... followed by 121, 441, 961, 691.. and so on |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» moondancer replied on Thu May 26, 2005 @ 1:23am |
 Coolness: 93190 | apparently you were confused |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» moondancer replied on Thu May 26, 2005 @ 1:30am |
| Coolness: 93190 | you're calculation makes sense only because you got the right results. but you added 1$ each to 8,333 to calculate what they paid, which is absolutely incorrect, since they each receive a dollar BACK, they didnt pay that dollar. you would have to take 2$/3 and then take that result and add it to 8.333_. which in fact, also comes out to 9$
in conclusion: you ar confusedx! |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» moondancer replied on Thu May 26, 2005 @ 2:39am |
| Coolness: 93190 | in case you still don't understadn
THEIR CHANGE WAS 3$ THEY PAID 25$, plus the 2$ that the bellboy stole |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» neoform replied on Thu May 26, 2005 @ 8:55am |
| Coolness: 340590 | if their change was $3 why did the manager give the bellhop $5 ? :| |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» AlienZeD replied on Thu May 26, 2005 @ 11:33am |
| Coolness: 510485 | The bellhop is crooked. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» michaeldino replied on Thu May 26, 2005 @ 11:51am |
| Coolness: 69900 | Originally posted by MOONDANCER...
in case you still don't understadn THEIR CHANGE WAS 3$ THEY PAID 25$, plus the 2$ that the bellboy stole yes... they paid 25$ "they" being 3... comes out to 8.3333$ each now, seeing as they already got 1$ back that mean that they had orignally spent 9.333$ and seeing as they gave the bellboy 2$... that adds up to a beautiful 30$ 1$ can't disappear explain to me how they could have goven 30$ and only 29$ add up afterwards... its just a play on words... im really not confused... seriously... math is my calling... dont try and tell me my math is wrong |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Screwhead replied on Thu May 26, 2005 @ 12:22pm |
 Coolness: 686515 | Well technically they did "pay" only $25 for the room, what with that $5 that was suposed to go to them. It's more a question of what perspective your looking at the "problem" from.
If your the hotel manager, they payed $25 total for the room because you gave them back $5 from their original 30 (of which $2 got intercepted on the way back to them by a crooked bellhop) If you look at it from the perspective of the guys in the hotel room, they payed $10 each, and each got $1 back (not knowing about the $2 that was stolen) so in their eyes, they payed $9 each. The only "missing" money is the $2 that the bellhop took, but the numbers still all add up. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» AlienZeD replied on Thu May 26, 2005 @ 1:05pm |
| Coolness: 510485 | Yep. 25$ + 2$ that the bellhop took and then the 3$ that the room got back. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» michaeldino replied on Thu May 26, 2005 @ 2:20pm |
| Coolness: 69900 | Originally posted by [SCREWHEAD]...
If you look at it from the perspective of the guys in the hotel room, they payed $10 each, and each got $1 back (not knowing about the $2 that was stolen) so in their eyes, they payed $9 each. NO! They paid 9.33$ each. Not 9$. Had they each paid 9$, 1$ would have disappeared. 9*3=27$ + 2$ for the bellhop = 29$ That extra dollar didnt disappear. They each paid 9.33$. I hate you all. |
| Good [+1]Toggle ReplyLink» Screwhead replied on Thu May 26, 2005 @ 3:02pm |
| Coolness: 686515 | Ok, they EACH GOT BACK $1
there are *3* of them. 3*$1 = 3 + the stolen $2 = $5 If the 3 of them ORIGINALY PAYED 30$ TOTAL 30/3 = $10 payed by EACH Each one of them got back $1 Had they come into the hotel with ONLY a $10 each, then they would now ONLY have $1. The bellhop pockets $2 which doesn't factor at ALL into the fact that the 3 guys EACH PAYED $10 and then they EACH GOT BACK $1. |
Riddles
[ Top Of Page ] |
Post A Reply |
You must be logged in to post a reply.
[ Top Of Page ] |
