Warning: mysql_fetch_assoc() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in D:\Websites\rave.ca\website\include\functions\visitors.php on line 5

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at D:\Websites\rave.ca\website\include\functions\visitors.php:5) in D:\Websites\rave.ca\website\index.php on line 546

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at D:\Websites\rave.ca\website\include\functions\visitors.php:5) in D:\Websites\rave.ca\website\index.php on line 547

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at D:\Websites\rave.ca\website\include\functions\visitors.php:5) in D:\Websites\rave.ca\website\index.php on line 548
US NY: PUB LTE: A Drug Law Overhaul - Rave.ca
Rave Radio: Offline (0/0)
Correo electrónico: Contraseña:
Anonymous
Nueva cuenta
¿Olvidaste tu contraseña?
News (Media Awareness Project) - US NY: PUB LTE: A Drug Law Overhaul
Title:US NY: PUB LTE: A Drug Law Overhaul
Published On:2000-10-30
Source:New York Times (NY)
Fetched On:2008-09-03 03:57:53
Referenced: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v00/n1612/a11.html?41373

A DRUG LAW OVERHAUL

As you note in "A Better Approach to Drug Offenders" (editorial, Oct. 26),
treatment is more effective and cheaper than incarceration. But
California's Proposition 36, like a proposal in New York to establish a new
apparatus of "drug courts," is the wrong approach.

As you point out, if offenders fail the drug court treatment, they are then
faced with felony criminal charges. What changed? Drug users are repeatedly
arrested. Why on one occasion do they deserve treatment, and on another
occasion they deserve imprisonment?

Drug users who want treatment should receive it. The mass incarceration of
drug users in New York and California must be ended, but drug courts are
not the answer. Decriminalization of drug possession is the answer.

Robert L. Cohen, M.D. New York
Miembro Comentarios
Ningún miembro observaciones disponibles